From ksue@comtec.daikin.co.jp  Fri Jun 28 00:56:56 1996
Received: from tokyogw1.comtec.daikin.co.jp  for ksue@comtec.daikin.co.jp
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id AAA05160; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 00:03:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by tokyogw1.comtec.daikin.co.jp (8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.3W9-95101819) id NAA08876 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 13:03:01 +0900 (JST)
Received: from tgdpcm10.tgdp.daikin.co.jp(150.35.192.110) by tokyogw1.comtec.daikin.co.jp via smap (V1.3)
	id sma008874; Fri Jun 28 13:02:35 1996
Received: from tgdppc18.tgdp.daikin.co.jp (tgdppc18.tgdp.daikin.co.jp [150.35.192.188]) by tgdpcm10.tgdp.daikin.co.jp (8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.3W9-96062515) with SMTP id NAA08440 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 13:02:34 +0900 (JST)
Received: by tgdppc18.tgdp.daikin.co.jp with Microsoft Mail
	id <01BB64F2.3183B900@tgdppc18.tgdp.daikin.co.jp>; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 13:03:25 +0900
Message-ID: <01BB64F2.3183B900@tgdppc18.tgdp.daikin.co.jp>
From: Suetuna <ksue@comtec.daikin.co.jp>
To: "'chemistry@www.ccl.net'" <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Changing my mail address
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 13:03:23 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear administrator.

I requested to change CCL mail address from "ccs-info@comtec.daikin.co.jp"
to "ksue@comec.daiki.co.jp" before.

At that time, "ksue@comtec.daikin.co.jp" . (Thank you.)

"ccs-info@comtec.daikin.co.jp" still remains.

I will show you the header of one of CCL mails below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------  
------------------------------------------------
Received: from tgdpcm10.tgdp.daikin.co.jp (tgdpcm10.tgdp.daikin.co.jp 
[150.35.192.110]) by tgdpks4.tgdp.daikin.co.jp 
(8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.3W9-96062515) with ESMTP id BAA17578; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 
01:19:19 +0900 (JST)
Received: from tokyogw1.comtec.daikin.co.jp (tgdpgw1.tokyo.daikin.co.jp 
[150.35.246.240]) by tgdpcm10.tgdp.daikin.co.jp 
(8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.3W9-96062515) with ESMTP id BAA06883; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 
01:19:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by tokyogw1.comtec.daikin.co.jp 
(8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.3W9-95101819) id BAA06885; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 01:19:15 
+0900 (JST)
Received: from ccut.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp(192.41.197.4) by 
tokyogw1.comtec.daikin.co.jp via smap (V1.3)
	id sma006876; Fri Jun 28 01:19:01 1996
Received: by ccut.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (5.67+1.6W/6.4J.6-ut3.196)
	id AA02466; Fri, 28 Jun 96 01:18:54 JST
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 23:44:30 +0900 (KST)
From: Lee Tae Bum <s196232@ccs.sogang.ac.kr>
X-Sender: s196232@ccs
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.BSD.3.93.960627233345.2978A-100000@ccs>
Precedence: bulk
Subject: CCL:molecular dynamics
Errors-To: chemistry-request@u-tokyo.ac.jp
Sender: chemistry-request@u-tokyo.ac.jp

I requested changing CCL mail address to "chemistry-request@u-tokyo.ac.jp" 3 
times.
But not changed.

I'm sorry to trouble you, but would you delete the address 
"ccs-info@comtec.daikin.co.jp"
from CCL mail ?
(Is it possible ?)

#############################################
             DAIKIN Industries, LTD.
               Electronics Div.

               CCS support
               Kiyoshi Suetsuna

       E-mail:ksue@comtec.daikin.co.jp
     TEL: 81-3-3344-5854   FAX: 81-3-3344-8113
#############################################



From ccluser@chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw  Fri Jun 28 09:57:01 1996
Received: from chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw  for ccluser@chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id JAA06986; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 09:50:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: <ccluser@chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw>
Received: by chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17913; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 21:49:19 +0900
Message-Id: <9606281249.AA17913@chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw>
Subject: DFT input
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 96 21:49:19 TAIDT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL17]



-- 


      Dear freinds,
     
       I got a question when I tried to run DFT using gaussian 94:
     
     
       I ran three kinds of input as follows,
     
      (1) #n b3lyp/sto-3g iop(5/45=10000800) iop(5/46=02000720)
          iop(5/47=01900810)
      (2) #n blyp/sto-3g iop(5/45=10000800) iop(5/46=02000720)
          iop(5/47=01900810)
      (3) #n b3lyp/sto-3g
    
      Why both (1) and (2) give the same energy results but differ from
      that of (3) ?
      And which input is the right one?
    
      Please e-mail me using the following e-mail adress
      Thanks a lot in advance.

==========================================================================
  May May Lin                   | E-mail: ccluser@chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw
  Department of chemistry       |         
  National Tsing Hua University |  Phone: 886-35-721634 
  Hsinchu, Taiwan 30043         |    Fax: 886-35-711082
=====================================================================

