From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Sun Aug 18 10:18:17 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id JAA22340; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 09:34:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns1.DKFZ-Heidelberg.de  for tajkhors@mbp-sgi7.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id JAA23756; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 09:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mbp-sgi7.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de (mbp-sgi7.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de [193.174.48.96]) 
          by ns1.DKFZ-Heidelberg.de (8.7.3/DKFZ-8.6.4) with ESMTP
          id PAA19731 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:30:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (tajkhors@localhost) 
          by mbp-sgi7.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de (940816.SGI.8.6.9/DKFZ-8.6.4)
          id PAA06689 for chemistry@ccl.net; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:30:34 +0200
From: "Emadeddin Tajkhorshid" <tajkhors@mbp-sgi7.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Message-Id: <9608181530.ZM6687@mbp-sgi7.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:30:33 -0600
Reply-To: E.Tajkhorshid@DKFZ-Heidelberg.de
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 26oct94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computational Chemistry List)
Subject: Back ground charges in G94
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Dear all

G94 is able to include background charges in single point calculation and this
option is not available for geometry optimization. On the other hand a few days
ago we had some messages in the list:


>     Gaussian94 is not supposed to optimize in uniform electric field
>also, but in fact it does. Keeping this in mind, I run optimization with
>background point charges. The first step seemed to work fine, generated
>new geometry and derivatives, etc. Nevertheless, at the second step point
>charges disappeared and eventually the geometry converged back to where I
>started. I suspect, Gaussian94 does not pass the information about
>point charges to some COMMON blocks, so they do not survive at the
>following steps of optimization route.

My question is that if it is able to calculate the derivatives in first step,
then what is the reason that CHARGE option is only available for single point
calc. Because in my eyes the problem of writing and reading background charges
in checkpoint file was not too hard to the people in Gaussian to be solved. If
so, please let me know.

Thanx in advance

-- 
Emad
*********************************************************************
E. Tajkhorshid				
German Cancer Research Center; DKFZ  Tel: +49 6221 42 2339
Dept. Molecular Biophysics (0810)    FAX: +49 6221 42 2333
P.O.Box 101949			     Email: E.Tajkhorshid@dkfz-heidelberg.de
69009 Heidelberg, FRG
*********************************************************************
* It is nice to be important, but it is more important to be nice!  *
*********************************************************************

From CHEMA@vms.huji.ac.il  Sun Aug 18 11:18:21 1996
Received: from VMS.HUJI.AC.IL  for CHEMA@vms.huji.ac.il
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id KAA22424; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 10:35:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 10:35:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199608181435.KAA22424@www.ccl.net>
Received: by HUJIVMS (HUyMail-V7b); Sun, 18 Aug 96 17:35:39 +0200
From: CHEMA@HUJIVMS
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Email file (AROM.)



Hi,I'd like to know about referece's to the problem of Potential
Surface between Aromatic compound's (phenyl etc..) and It's dependence in
the angle between them.


Thanks in advance. Doron


Chema@vms.huji.ac.il

From rgab@mx.trpntech.com  Sun Aug 18 21:18:24 1996
Received: from mx.trpntech.com  for rgab@mx.trpntech.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id VAA24043; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 21:17:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <n1371730206.56065@mx.trpntech.com>
Date: 18 Aug 1996 18:16:09 -0700
From: "Richard Bone" <rgab@mx.trpntech.com>
Subject: META Tags in HTML
To: "CCL" <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2


Subject:      META Tags in HTML
                                                                     


Just a couple of follow-ups to Henry Rzepa's helpful comment:

I was recently adding a URL to Infoseek's database;  they have
a useful help-file which describes the use of META tags. It's
probably worth taking a look.

I have been gradually, over time, amending HTML documents that
I have created to contain 'accurate' META  tags.

If anyone has, like me, used Microsoft's freebies to create
HTML straight from, e.g., Word documents, they will likely have
noticed that the raw HTML which is created contains by default
the META:

<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Internet Assistant for Micros
oft Word 2.0">

Of course, this is probably great for Bill Gates  et al., but 
not much use to the rest of the surfing world.

Richard Bone


__________________________________________________________

Richard G. A. Bone, PhD.
Terrapin Technologies, Inc.      
750-H Gateway Blvd.
South San Francisco
CA 94080-7020
USA

Tel. +1 (415) 244 9303
FAX  +1 (415) 244 0705
E-mail  rgab@trpntech.com
http://www.sosei.com/Companies/Terrapin.html

