From leclerf@MEDCN.UMontreal.CA  Fri Aug 23 08:19:24 1996
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA  for leclerf@MEDCN.UMontreal.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id IAA08827; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from meds1.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA (meds1.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA [132.204.11.103]) by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id MAA01203
  (8.6.11/IDA-1.6 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>); Fri, 23 Aug 1996 12:13:38 GMT
Received: from med07.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA by meds1.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA (950215.SGI.8.6.10/5.17)
	id IAA12496; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:16:17 -0400
Received: by med07.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA (950215.SGI.8.6.10/5.17)
	id IAA06910; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:16:16 -0400
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:16:16 -0400
From: leclerf@MEDCN.UMontreal.CA (Leclerc Fabrice)
Message-Id: <9608230816.ZM6906@med07.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 26oct94 MediaMail)
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: anticancer drug
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="PART-BOUNDARY=.19608230816.ZM6906.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA"



--PART-BOUNDARY=.19608230816.ZM6906.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA
Content-Description: Text
Content-Type: text/plain ; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Zm-Decoding-Hint: mimencode -q -u 

Hello,

I'm looking some information about this anticancer drug which the discove=
ry was
announced a few weeks ago in the media stemming from a research project o=
f the
army on the protection of the human body from the radiations.
Any information is wellcome.
Thanks.

-- =

 \  /\
  \/  \______________________________________
  /\                                      =

 A--T       Fabrice Leclerc               =

(----)      D=E9partement de Biochimie
 G--C       Universit=E9 de Montr=E9al        =

  \/        C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-Ville =

  /\        Montr=E9al, Qu=E9bec H3C 3J7      =

 T--A       Canada
(----)      t=E9l. +1 (514)343-6111 poste 5354
 C--G       fax. +1 (514)343-2177
  \/        leclerf@MEDCN.UMontreal.CA
  /\    _____________________________________
 /  \  /
     \/


--PART-BOUNDARY=.19608230816.ZM6906.MEDCN.UMontreal.CA--


From 94970459@tolka.dcu.ie  Fri Aug 23 13:19:27 1996
Received: from tolka.dcu.ie  for 94970459@tolka.dcu.ie
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id NAA10160; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 13:06:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by tolka.dcu.ie; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Feb96-0535PM)
	id AA27205; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 18:05:51 +0100
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 18:05:51 +0100 (BST)
From: patrick kane <94970459@tolka.dcu.ie>
To: CCL Every <chemistry@www.ccl.net>,
        HChem User <hyperchem@hyper.com>, HChem Supp <support@hyper.com>
Subject: Geometry Optimisations with Scripts in HyperChem
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960823172858.8869A-100000@tolka.dcu.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



 Hi,

 I am a HyperChem user. When I wish to run molecular mechanics geometry
optimisations (using MM+) with scripts I find that the termination
conditions (the RMS gradient and the max number of cycles) and the screen
refresh period do not change when the script is run. Instead, I need to
carry out a 'manual' geometry optimization on some molecule (not
necesarily one of those molecules referred to in the script) with the
required settings, stop the optimisation after a few seconds and then run
the script. This is very tedious and I would be very grateful if anyone
could provide a solution. 

 If it helps, the offending script commands are typically:

optim-max-cycles 4000
optim-convergence 0.01
optim-algorithm newtonraphson (THIS LINE DOES NOT CAUSE ME A PROBLEM)
screen-refresh-period 200

 Regards,
 Paddy.

 Paddy Kane
 School of Chemical Sciences
 Dublin City University
 Ireland

 94970459@tolka.dcu.ie
 
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------


From rhk2@po.cwru.edu  Fri Aug 23 15:19:26 1996
Received: from celeste.INS.CWRU.Edu  for rhk2@po.cwru.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id OAA10476; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 14:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cwgk4 (cwgk4.CHEM.CWRU.Edu [129.22.200.78]) by celeste.INS.CWRU.Edu with SMTP (8.6.13+cwru/CWRU-2.4)
	id OAA01604; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 14:20:38 -0400 (from rhk2@po.cwru.edu for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>)
Sender: kim@celeste.INS.CWRU.Edu
Message-ID: <321E206B.41C6@po.cwru.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 17:19:39 -0400
From: Richard Kim <rhk2@po.cwru.edu>
Organization: CWRU
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.2 IP12)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Help!!!!! Gaussian Input File
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Can somebody tell me where I can get a nice shareware program to prepare
a gaussian input file from a pdb or mopac or hyperchem file. Thanks in
advance.

Rich Kim & Meihua Tu

From steen@kiku.dk  Fri Aug 23 16:19:29 1996
Received: from carbon.kiku.dk  for steen@kiku.dk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id PAA10773; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 15:49:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carbon.kiku.dk (smail3.1.29.1)
	id m0uu2EJ-000pAcC; Fri, 23 Aug 96 21:49 METDST
Message-Id: <m0uu2EJ-000pAcC@carbon.kiku.dk>
From: Steen Hammerum <steen@kiku.dk>
Subject: Summary: Speed of new HP and SGI workstations
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 21:49:19 +0200 (METDST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text



Summary: Speed of new HP and SGI workstations

I recently asked this group for advice with regard to the performance
of new HP and SGI workstations running the Gaussian programs

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Does anyone have or know of benchmarks for Gaussian 94 or related programs
running on the new SGI and HP chips (R10000 and PA8000), or other
information to assist us before we decide on new machinery?

We are currently considering SGI Power Indigo 2 and HP C160 workstations
that will be used predominantly for Gaussian calculations, but we are not
sure how well the SPECint95 and SPECfp95 numbers allow us to assess the
relative performance.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

There weren't very many answers, and in particular, no-one came forward with
results obtained with the new HP PA8000 machines.

---

Roberto Gomperts (roberto@boston.sgi.com) provided the following comparison
of the SGI R8000 and R10000 chips when running test178 from the Gaussian 94
test suite (a single point, direct scf calculation with 300 basis
functions), using Gaussian 94, rev. D3.

   Machine	  Chip/Frequency	Sec. Cache	Time(min.)
Power Indigo2	   r8k/75 MHz		  2 MB		  8.04
Power Challenge	   r8k/90 MHz		  4 MB		  6.50
Power Indigo2     r10k/195 MHz		  1 MB		  7.30
Power Challenge	  r10k/195 MHz	          1 MB		  7.08
Power Challenge	  r10k/195 MHz		  2 MB		  5.95

The Power Challenge runs are done on 1 processor.  These are all CPU times. 
The Wall clock times are very similar to these (less than 20 sec. difference)

---

John Brodholt (j.brodholt@ucl.ac.uk) pointed me to

http://gserv1.dl.ac.uk/TCSC/disco/TechPapers/bench/bench.html

This site provides a detailed, critical and very useful comparison of the
performance of a wide variety of newer workstations; unfortunately, no
results obtained with HP PA8000 machines are included (html version not yet
available, but a postscript version can be downloaded).  The comparison is
based on timing data obtained with GAMESS-UK (rather than Gaussian).  The
results illustrate that the relative performance varies quite a bit with
the type of calculation undertaken.

---

Eric Billings (billings@helix.nih.gov) pointed me to

http://www.ki.si/parallel/summary.html

The information was designed to compare parallel architectures, but the 
single CPU column provides useful information.

---

Finally, Glenn McEnroe (gmcenroe@crl.com) suggested that I looked elsewhere:

"Regarding your question about SGI vs HP you should check out the latest
issue of Journal of Computational Chem V17 No. 11 1385-86 entitled
Viability of Molecular Modeling with Pentium based PCs. This article does
not compare these new chips for SGI and HP but it appears that you may be
better off running your application on a pentium based machine if Gaussian
94 is available for this platform."

---

Many thanks to everyone who answered.

Steen
-- 
	
Steen Hammerum                                           steen@kiku.dk
Department of Chemistry                              (+45) 35 32 02 08
University of Copenhagen, Denmark               fax: (+45) 35 32 02 12


From chpajt@bath.ac.uk  Fri Aug 23 17:19:29 1996
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk  for chpajt@bath.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.5/950822.1) id QAA10894; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 16:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bath.ac.uk (actually host midge.bath.ac.uk) 
          by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Fri, 23 Aug 1996 21:22:02 +0100
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 21:21:59 +0100 (BST)
From: A J Turner <chpajt@bath.ac.uk>
To: Richard Kim <rhk2@po.cwru.edu>
cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:G:Help!!!!! Gaussian Input File
In-Reply-To: <321E206B.41C6@po.cwru.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960823212054.16551C-100000@midge.bath.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi!

Xmol - I cannot remeber where is is right now - but I guess that if you
don't have ten thousand other people saying where it is - you'll find it
using netsearch.

Cheers

Alex

 -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Alexander J Turner         |A.J.Turner@bath.ac.uk                  |
|Post Graduate              |http://www.bath.ac.uk/~chpajt/home.html|
|School of Chemistry        |+144 1225 8262826 ext 5137             |
|University of Bath         |                                       |
|Bath, Avon, U.K.           |Field: QM/MM modeling                  |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 



