From qojskd@uscmail.usc.es  Thu Oct 31 04:17:54 1996
Received: from uscmail.usc.es  for qojskd@uscmail.usc.es
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.2/950822.1) id EAA12414; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 04:15:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [193.144.74.36] (qolera.usc.es) by uscmail.usc.es (5.67b/1.34)
	id AA14419; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:14:40 +0100
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:14:40 +0100
Message-Id: <199610310914.AA14419@uscmail.usc.es>
From: "F. Javier Sardina"  <qojskd@uscmail.usc.es>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Freeware for NMR data processing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: POPmail 2.3b5


  Dear fellow netters:

The newest versions of the freeware NMR data processing programs SwaN-MR (3.2.4 
for PowerMacintosh) and MestRe-C (1.1.1 for Windows 95) have just been released.
They can be retrieved from any of the following anonymous ftp repositories:

SwaN-MR 3.2.4 (for PowerMacintosh):

   qobrue.usc.es/nmr/SwaN-MR/Swan_mr_324
   ftp.uniovi.es/pub/Mac/nmr
   ftp.rediris.es/software/incoming/science/nmr/swan-mr
   www.ccl.net/pub/chemistry/software/MAC/Swan-NR

For more information check SwaN-MR WWW home page:
   http://qobrue.usc.es/jsgroup/swan/home.htm

MestRe-C 1.1.1 (for PC's with Windows 95):

   ftp://qobrue.usc.es/pub/nmr/MestRe-C
   ftp.uniovi.es/pub/win95/nmr
   ftp.rediris.es/software/incoming/science/nmr/mestrec111
   ftp://www.ccl.net/pub/chemistry/software/MS-WINDOWS95/MestRe-C

For more information check MestRe-C WWW home page:
   http://qobrue.usc.es/jsgroup/MestRe-C/MestRe-C.html

Happy NMR data processing

  F. Javier Sardina


F. Javier Sardina                      Phone: 34-81-591085
Departamento de Quimica Organica              34-81-563100. Ext 14234
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela  Fax:   34-81-595012 or 34-81-591091
15706 Santiago de Compostela           e-mail: qojskd@usc.es       
      SPAIN                            http://qobrue.usc.es/jsgroup/Js-eng.html
                                    


From cdac.ernet.in!gadre@parcom.ernet.in  Thu Oct 31 10:18:02 1996
Received: from sangam.ncst.ernet.in  for cdac.ernet.in!gadre@parcom.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.2/950822.1) id KAA14634; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:09:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by sangam.ncst.ernet.in (8.7.5) id UAA03241 for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 20:43:37 +0530 (GMT+05:30)
>Received: from parcom.UUCP by iucaa (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA18000; Thu, 31 Oct 96 09:42:01+050
Received: from parcom by sangam.ncst.ernet.in; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 20:43 GMT
Received: from parcom.UUCP by iucaa (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA18000; Thu, 31 Oct 96 09:42:01+050
Received: by parcom.cdac.ernet.in (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA26175; Thu Oct 31 09:26:05 1996 (GMT + 0530)
Date: Thu Oct 31 09:26:05 1996 (GMT + 0530)
From: gadre@cdac.ernet.in
Message-Id: <9610310356.AA26175@parcom.cdac.ernet.in>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Packing in hydrocarbons
Content-Type: text


Dear Sirs :
  Do you have a guess or explanation for the fact that the paraffins
pack with their skeletons almost parallel.
   Further, what is a simple explanation for the fact that even
n
paraffins have higher MP's than the next odd n-ones?
I'll be grateful for your response and references related to
my query. Thanks...................................Shridhar Gadre
31.10.96.


From joubert@ext.jussieu.fr  Thu Oct 31 10:37:02 1996
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr  for joubert@ext.jussieu.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.2/950822.1) id JAA14446; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 09:33:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from idf.ext.jussieu.fr (idf.ext.jussieu.fr [134.157.81.129])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.7.6/jtpda-5.2) with ESMTP id PAA03110
          for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:32:29 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [134.157.11.17] by idf.ext.jussieu.fr
	  (8.6.10/jtpda-4.0) with SMTP; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:32:22 +0100
X-Sender: joubert@idf.ext.jussieu.fr
Message-Id: <v01540b02ae9e642906e2@[134.157.11.17]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:38:05 +0200
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: joubert@ext.jussieu.fr (Laurent Joubert)
Subject: G94 Cube files visualization


Dear Netters,

There have been many questions regarding visualization of
the data generated by Gaussian 94 Cube files.

One way to visualize these files, is to get a great FREEWARE called "SciAn"
which is a scientific visualization and animation program for SGI and IBM
Risc6000 workstations.
You can get it at the following ftp address :
ftp.scri.fsu.edu (/pub/SciAn)

The last version is a beta one : /pub/SciAn/beta/scian120.tar.Z (This is
the one I use).

Once you have installed the software, it is easy to convert cube files to
the "stf" file format which is readable by SciAn (I have written a small
program which can do it, in order to visualize density, electrostatic
potential or molecular orbitals).
If you have any problem, do not hesitate to contact me.

Laurent Joubert

********************************************************
*  Laurent JOUBERT (PhD student)                       *
*                                                      *
*  Ecole Nationale Superieure de Chimie de Paris       *
*  Laboratoire d'Electrochimie et de Chimie Analytique *
*  11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie                       *
*  75231 PARIS CEDEX 05- FRANCE                        *
*                                                      *
*  Tel : 44-27-66-94                                   *
*  Fax : 44-27-67-50                                   *
*                                                      *
*  E-Mail : joubert@ext.jussieu.fr                     *
*  http://www.enscp.jussieu.fr                         *
********************************************************



From PEARLMAN@VAX.PHR.UTEXAS.EDU  Thu Oct 31 12:22:32 1996
Received: from VAX.PHR.UTEXAS.EDU  for PEARLMAN@VAX.PHR.UTEXAS.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.2/950822.1) id MAA15708; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 12:08:39 -0500 (EST)
From: <PEARLMAN@VAX.PHR.UTEXAS.EDU>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 11:08:37 -0600 (CST)
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Message-Id: <961031110837.7300@VAX.PHR.UTEXAS.EDU>
Subject: What *YOU* can do to help with the future of the CCL


Greetings --

Jan Labanowski recently posted a message regarding the future of the
CCL.  He specifically asked that we NOT take up "CCL-bandwidth" by
discussing the various issues "on-line" and I certainly do not intend
to ignore his request!!  However, Jan made a second request in his
message which I fear some CCL-readers might not have seen.  "Buried"
under 222 lines of very good (but lengthy) justifications was the text:

>So now is the reality check... Please contribute as individuals now...
>I will of course remind you about the CCL Drive several times. Send the
>checks with the amount you consider reasonable to me:
>
>   Jan Labanowski
>   Ohio Supercomputer Center
>   1224 Kinnear Rd
>   Columbus, OH 43212-1163
>
>and make the checks payable to:
>
>   OSC Development Fund (CCL)
>
>(Not to me personally, since I will not be able to cash them!!!)
>You will receive a THANK YOU letter, which you need to keep for your
>records, since the contribution IS TAX DEDUCTIBLE and you should deduct
>it on your income tax return (Yes, I checked this!!!).

Jan also pointed out that the CCL's annual costs (approximately $200,000)
could be met if EVERY subscriber contributed $100.  Of course, it is not
possible for all subscribers to contribute but it provides an indication
of the dollar amounts he he hoping to receive from those of us who can
make such contributions.  I'm sure that contributions in *any* amount 
will be appreciated.

  -- Bob Pearlman



From ccl@www.ccl.net  Thu Oct 31 14:30:48 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.2/950822.1) id OAA16485; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:01:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from adams.patriot.net  for eslone@patriot.net
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.2/950822.1) id OAA04692; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:01:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eslone.erols.com (th-0-25.patriot.net [206.151.9.35]) by adams.patriot.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA20398; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:58:53 -0500
Message-ID: <3278F750.5DCA@patriot.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:00:32 -0500
From: "J. Eric Slone" <eslone@patriot.net>
Reply-To: eslone@patriot.net
Organization: Scientific Consulting Services
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net, CHMINF-L@IUBVM.UCS.INDIANA.EDU
Subject: Free Molgen Copy Now ONLINE!
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hello again:

Molgen is now available from CCL archives as:
   ftp://www.ccl.net/pub/chemistry/software/MS-DOS/molgen

You can also get there via Web 
   http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
     -> CC Archive -> software -> MS-DOS -> molgen

A copy of the Users Manual in MS Word 7 format is available 
from my homepage at:
   http://www.patriot.net/users/eslone

Please feel free to download and distribute this program and manual
as you wish (as long as it's for FREE).  

Although I will not provide technical support on a free program,
I am happy to receive comments and suggestions.

Please re-post this message on any other chemistry related lists
you belong to.

Thanks!
Eric

___________________________________________________________________

 J. Eric Slone                                 10 years of Serving
 Scientific Consulting Services            the Technical Community
 5500 Holmes Run Parkway, Suite 501   
 Alexandria, Virginia  22304-2851
            
 Phone:     (703) 461-7078               mailto:eslone@patriot.net
 Fax:       (703) 751-6639     http://www.patriot.net/users/eslone
___________________________________________________________________

              Visit the Tuva Trader Online on our site at: 
              http://www.patriot.net/users/eslone/tuva.htm
___________________________________________________________________

                      Freelance Technical Writing
                  Software and Multimedia Development
                     Specializing in the Sciences 
___________________________________________________________________

From ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp  Thu Oct 31 20:17:55 1996
Received: from deews1.dent.okayama-u.ac.jp  for ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.2/950822.1) id TAA18372; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 19:37:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [150.46.140.80] (yobou2.dent.okayama-u.ac.jp) by deews1.dent.okayama-u.ac.jp (5.67+1.6W/6.4JAIN-1.1)
	id AA06550; Fri, 1 Nov 96 09:37:01 JST
Message-Id: <9611010037.AA06550@deews1.dent.okayama-u.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:45:39 +0900
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQDVCPBsoQg==?=)
Subject: CCL:SUMMARY:BSSE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
X-Mailer: Eudora-J(1.3.8.5-J13)


      I send you a summary of answers about BSSE.$B!!(BI would like to thank eve
rybody for many advices. I hope this summary will help everybody.
Masao Masamura

Masao Masamura:

<my questions>

        Dear Sir:

        I would like to ask about BSSE.

(1) In large basis set, how large is BSSE ?
(2) In chemical physics letters, 217(1994)48 written by Ernest R. Davidson
and Subhas J. Chakravorty, an explanation is provided for the tendency in
water and HF dimers for the counterpoise-corrected correlation energy to
seem worse than the uncorrected energy. Do you know related paper ?
(3) Do you know best method for removing BSSE ?

        Thank you.

============================================================================
=====
Masao Masamura 
Okayama University Dental School
Department of Preventive Dentistry
Fax: 81-86-225-3724
e-mail: ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp 
============================================================================
=====

<answers>

you might find our article on the HF dimer of use:

K.A. Peterson and T.H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 102, 2032 (1995).

I believe there is now a general consensus in the literature that the function
counterpoise method of Boys and Bernardi is the best way to remove BSSE.

best regards,

Kirk Peterson

-- 

Kirk A. Peterson
Assistant Professor              Affiliate Scientist
Department of Chemistry     &    Theory, Modeling, and Simulation
Washington State University      Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory
Richland, WA                     Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Office: (509) 375-6350, (509) 372-7282
Fax:    (509) 375-6631
                     ka_peterson@pnl.gov
            http://www.tricity.wsu.edu/~kipeters/

Date: Thu, 17 Oct 96 17:19:44 -0230
From: cory@bohr.chem.mun.ca (Cory C. Pye) To: ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp
Subject: BSSE

1) Usually not very big.
2) I am not familiar with this paper, but I will look it up. 3) I
personally feel that the CHA method is the best way to remove BSSE. 

You may wish to have a look at C. C. Pye et al, JMS (Theochem), 307 (1994)
239 where we calculate BSSE for 46 basis sets from STO_3G up to quadruple
zeta for 8 systems, using both CHA and Boys-Bernardi counterpoise method.
There are a few references in here that may be useful.
-Cory
*************
***************** ! Cory C. Pye
*** ** ** ** ! Graduate Student and Unpaid Sys Admin ** * ****  !
Theoretical and Computational Chemistry
**      * *     ! cory@bohr.chem.mun.ca
**      * *     ! http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~cory/index.html
***     * * ** !
***************** ! Les Hartree-Focks
************* ! (Apologies to Montreal Canadien Fans) 

Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 22:03:03 +0100
From: Marc Prosenc <prosenc@dg5.chemie.uni-konstanz.de>
Apparently-To: ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp

hi masao,

to avoid BSSE try to maximize your base-set. if you already know which
atoms have a superposition
error, put polarisation functions to these atoms to describe the electron
distribution correct.


greetings

marc

From: David Heisterberg <djh@ccl.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 17:34:57 -0400
To: Chemistry@www.ccl.net, ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp
Subject: CCL:BSSE
Sender: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry-request@www.ccl.net>
Errors-To: ccl@www.ccl.net
Precedence: bulk

Masao Masamura writes:
>        I would like to ask about BSSE.

There is an interesting paper by van Duijneveldt et.al. in
Chemical Reviews 94, 1873 (1994).  They argue rather strongly
that counterpoise correction is the way to go.  They are also
"forced to conclude that this new definition of BSSE [Davidson
and Chakravorty] is superfluous, and one may only hope that its
introduction will not further increase the confusion surrounding
the CP recipe."  It's a spirited review!

Dave Heisterberg

-------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
-- Original Sender Envelope Address: djh@ccl.net
-- Original Sender From: Address: djh@ccl.net
CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
             Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 


Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 09:28:33 +0200
From: hutschka@quantix.u-strasbg.fr
To: ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re:  CCL:BSSE

Masao,

In theory, the larger your basis set is the smaller will be
the counterpoise correction to the interaction energy between
your fragments.
At my knowledge, the counterpoise correction is the most accepted
correction to avoid BSSE.
Ypu can take a look at the review by Van Duijneveldt:

State of the art in countepoise theory, Van Duijneveldt et al., Chem. Rev.,
1994,
1873-1885.

Regarding to the paper of Davidson et al. you can take a look at:

Kallies, Mitzner, J. Mol. Model., 1995, 1, 68-78

The paper deal with proton transfer in hydrogen bonded system and
talk about BSSE evaluated at various level including MP2.

http://derioc1.organik.uni-erlangen.de/info/JMOLMOD/papers/papers.html

I hope this will help you.

Francois

=============================================================================
 Fran$Bgo(Bis HUTSCHKA                 Ph.D. Student in Quantum Chemistry       
                                                                       
Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique                                          
UPR 139 du CNRS                                                          
4, rue Blaise Pascal              Phone:  (33).88.41.60.32               
67000 STRASBOURG                  Fax:    (33).88.61.20.85               
FRANCE                            E-Mail: hutschka@quantix.u-strasbg.fr 
============================================================================
=

Date: Fri, 18 Oct 96 10:23:45 +0200
From: aldert@chemde4.leidenuniv.nl (Aldert Westra Hoekzema)
To: <ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp>
Subject: Re:  CCL:BSSE

Hi Masao,

Regarding your questions about BSSE I do not consider myself qualified
to give my opinion, but I can recommend the following article:

"State of the Art in Counterpoise Theory"
F.B. van Duijnevelt, J.G.C.M. van Duijnevelt & J.H. van Lenthe,
Chem. Rev. 94 (1994), 1873-1885.

Kind greetings,  Aldert

-------------------------------------------
A.J.A. Westra Hoekzema
Conformational Analysis (Organic Chemistry)
Leiden Institute of Chemistry,
Gorlaeus Laboraties, Leiden University
P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden
The Netherlands
Phone : +31 715274505
Fax   : +31 715274488
E-mail: aldert@chemde4.LeidenUniv.nl
-------------------------------------------


From: mbdpsrl <mbdpsrl@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
Subject: BSSE
To: ep7@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 09:38:01 +0100 (BST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 719

Dear Dr. Masamura,

I hope you don't mind me emailing you directly. I was in a similar
position to you last year, as I did not know very much about 
BSSE.Also I am not a specialist in computational chemistry
which made things very difficult to understand.

I did alot of reading about this as it directly affected my work
but there is a GREAT deal of controversy over BSSE and
how it is dealt with.

If you wish I will send you a list of my papers that I found regarding
the subject, also please search through the archives of the CCL
lists and there should be some information there.


Best wishes,

Robert V. Law,
Dept. of Chemistry,
University of Manchester,
Manchester M13 9PL
U.K.

email:mbdpsrl@afs.mcc.ac.uk

Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 08:56:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Subhas J. Chakravorty" <rahsjc@rohmhaas.com>
X-Sender: rahsjc@walrus.sh.rohmhaas.com
To: Chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: CCL:BSSE
Sender: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry-request@www.ccl.net>
Errors-To: ccl@www.ccl.net
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 17 Oct 1996, David Heisterberg wrote:

> Masao Masamura writes:
> >        I would like to ask about BSSE.
> 
> There is an interesting paper by van Duijneveldt et.al. in
> Chemical Reviews 94, 1873 (1994).  They argue rather strongly
> that counterpoise correction is the way to go.  They are also
> "forced to conclude that this new definition of BSSE [Davidson
> and Chakravorty] is superfluous, and one may only hope that its
> introduction will not further increase the confusion surrounding
> the CP recipe."  It's a spirited review!
> 
> Dave Heisterberg

There are a couple of comments and replies on our paper
in CPL which may be of interest.

Feller, DelBene and Dunning groups have been studying the
dimers, their studies and results are relevant.


Subhas J. Chakravorty,

sjchakravorty@rohmhaas.com

(215)-619-5481
Rohm and Haas Company
Spring House, PA-19447

**************************************************************************
Disclaimer : Opinions in the above text are not of Rohm and Haas Company +
**************************************************************************


-------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
-- Original Sender Envelope Address: rahsjc@rohmhaas.com
-- Original Sender From: Address: rahsjc@rohmhaas.com
CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
             Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 



 .


 .




