From ccl@www.ccl.net  Wed Nov 27 01:09:42 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id AAA00589; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:45:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from curie.syr.edu  for cmartin@curie.syr.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id AAA26338; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:45:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: by curie.syr.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	 id AAA24313; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:27:10 -0800
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:27:10 -0800
Message-Id: <199611270827.AAA24313@curie.syr.edu>
From: Charles Martin <cmartin@curie.syr.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Anion basis sets for excited state calculations


Hello Netters,

	I am running ab initio excited state calculations on 
phenolate [Bz-O(-)] and some larger, conjugated phenolate derivatives.

	I am hoping that someone has some experience in choosing
the proper ab initio basis set (i.e. do I need special functions
for the O- non-bonding orbitals) and the selection of the
LUMO orbitals for a correlated, multi-reference configuration
calculation.  I have seen only 1 recent Bz-O(-) calculations
using the CASPT2 method, but the details are scarce. Perhaps
some of you have performed CASPT2, MRSDCI, EOM-type, etc.,
calculations on negative ions of this type and have some
experience that you could share with me?

	Thanks in advance

	Chuck Martin

-- 
========================================================
 ||     Charles H. Martin                            ||
 ||     2-004 Center for Science and Technology      ||
 ||     W. M. Keck Center for Molecular Electronics  ||
 ||     Department of Chemistry                      ||
 ||     Syracuse University                          ||
 ||     Syracuse, NY  13244                          ||
--------------------------------------------------------
 ||     cmartin@cat.syr.edu                          ||
 ||     cmartin@rainbow.uchicago.edu                 ||
 ||     OFFICE (315) 443-3754                        ||
 ||     LAB    (315) 443-5928                        ||
 ||     FAX    (315) 443-4070                        ||
========================================================

From Herve.TOULHOAT@ifp.fr  Wed Nov 27 08:59:50 1996
Received: from ifp.ifp.fr  for Herve.TOULHOAT@ifp.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA02655; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 08:26:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from irsil47.ifp.fr(156.118.20.167) by ifp.ifp.fr via smap (1.3.1)
	id sma013090; Wed, 27 Nov 96 14:26:14 MET
From: "Herve Toulhoat" <toulhoat@ifp.fr>
Message-Id: <9611271426.ZM29068@irsil47>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 14:25:59 +0100
In-Reply-To: bcnlma@hkpucc.polyu.edu.hk (Ida N. L. Ma)
        "CCL:electrophilic substitution" (Nov 27,  4:37am)
References: <v01540b01aec22a4f9c99@[158.132.30.106]>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 6apr95 MediaMail)
To: bcnlma@hkpucc.polyu.edu.hk (Ida N. L. Ma), CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:electrophilic substitution
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Dear Dr Ma,

On that problem, you might benefit from consulting Pr Bernard Silvi from Paris
University. I am aware of some recent elegant work he did in that field, based
on  his method of topological analysis of Becke's Electron Localization
Function.

You can reach B. Silvi at  silvi@pauling.exp.uji.es at the moment, and at
silvi@lct.jussieu.fr usually.

Sincerely yours,

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr HERVE TOULHOAT
Group Leader					
Molecular Modeling and Computational Chemistry	
Div. Computer Science and Applied Mathematics	
INSTITUT FRANCAIS DU PETROLE			Tel: +33-01-47-52-73-50
1 & 4 Avenue de Bois-Preau			Fax: +33-01-47-52-70-22
BP 311 92852 RUEIL-MALMAISON Cedex FRANCE	E-mail: herve.toulhoat@ifp.fr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


From ccl@www.ccl.net  Wed Nov 27 10:54:33 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id JAA03167; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 09:50:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rune.biokemi.su.se  for arne@rune.biokemi.su.se
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id JAA01273; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 09:50:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from arne@localhost) by rune.biokemi.su.se (8.7/8.7) id PAA28353; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 15:50:11 +0100 (MET)
To: Tore.Samuelsson@medmod.medkem.gu.se, CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: bioinformatics on the Internet
From: Arne Elofsson <arne@rune.biokemi.su.se>
Date: 27 Nov 1996 15:50:11 +0100
Message-ID: <ygb3exvbnj0.fsf@rune.biokemi.su.se>
Lines: 80
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.37/XEmacs 19.14




Dear .....

Recently I taught a course in "bioinformatics on the Internet", and I
thought that my experiences could be important to others too.

All information about the course including assignments etc can be
found at http://www.biokemi.su.se/~arne/kurser/kurs_96/ 

The course was given to about 20 students with very different
backgrounds. This was of course a problem. The computer scientists and
the physicists was much easier to teach than the biochemists
and molecular biologists. The main problems for the bio-students were
to get programs such as rasmol to work on their Mac's without crashing
too often etc. (Is this possible ?)

Further I was the only teacher, except for about 9 guest lecturers,
this made it impossible to organize computer labs etc. Therefore all
assignments was supposed to be done by the students them self, without
any supervision. This proved to work fine for the computer/physics
students while it took a lot of time for the bio-student to get
everything running.


Please feel free to read the http pages and if anyone has any input I
would really appreciate that.




OK, so what did I learn.


General
-------
1) Computer demonstrations/labs should be given in first week
   I think this is necessary and actually will save time, as the
students then at least know how to use netscape and rasmol.
   
2) Use more interactive lectures (do the assignments)
   It is more fun, but take more time to prepare, and I would have to
use a MAC. Well I could probably run Linux on a PC so that is OK.

5) Local servers for something to speed up things.
  Some servers are very slow, therefore it could be a good idea to set
up some servers (like blast) locally.


Problems 
--------
1) UCLA threader server
   The organizer refused to give my students access to their threading
page. 

2) Slow responds from some servers sometimes
  For instance PHD sometime took several days to answer.

3) My local alignment page needs to be improved

4) Very low interaction on the net between students
  This is to bad, I do not know hoe to improve that. Mailing lists is
the only alternative as no bio-students read news or surf
regularly. Maybe I should set up some assignments where it is
necessary to collaborate with each other. but HOW ?



thanxs


arne




-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
      From: Arne Elofsson         Email: arne@bimbo.biokemi.su.se
      Tel:+46(0)8-161553   WWW:  http://www.biokemi.su.se/~arne/

