From mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au  Thu Dec 19 01:10:35 1996
Received: from uniwa.uwa.edu.au  for mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id AAA28916; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:16:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au (graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au [130.95.232.1]) by uniwa.uwa.edu.au (8.8.3/8.8.0) with SMTP id NAA24958 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:16:14 +0800
Received: from pack.crystal.uwa.edu.au by graf.crystal.uwa.edu.au with SMTP (5.61+IDA+MU)
	id AA04660; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 15:39:28 +0800
From: mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au (Magda Wajrak)
Message-Id: <9612190516.AA01796@pack.crystal.uwa.edu.au>
Subject: Ca(H2PO4)2.H2O?
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 96 13:16:09 WST
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Hello,

Does any one know the space group of Ca(H2PO4)2.H2O, it was not
reported in the Neutron Diffraction Study paper and I can't get
hold of earier X-ray paper.
Or maybe how could I find it.

Thank you.


magda

(mw@crystal.uwa.edu.au)

From kolar@surf.pangea.ca  Thu Dec 19 02:10:35 1996
Received: from surf.pangea.ca  for kolar@surf.pangea.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id BAA29183; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 01:50:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (kolar@localhost) by surf.pangea.ca (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA01448 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:49:12 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:49:12 -0600 (CST)
From: Miroslav Kolar <kolar@surf.pangea.ca>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Reaction-diffusion solver, C
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961219004339.28608F-100000@surf.pangea.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Would you like to try TRANSIENT - a new reaction-diffusion
equations solver?

For more details, visit: http://www.pangea.ca/~kolar/trans.htm 


HERE IS AT LEAST A SHORT DESCRIPTION:
   TRANSIENT is a C program for the time-dependent
solution of arbitrary systems of generally nonlinear, parabolic partial
differential equations in two variables (space and time), in particular,
reaction-diffusion equations. An efficient adaptable time-stepping
algorithm is applied. User has to supply a problem definition module
(PDM) for each system of equations. A detailed 39 page manual, and
demonstration PDM's for four different problems are supplied with the
package. One of the demonstration PDM's deals with the simulation of the
uniform corrosion of a metal surface and the diffusion of the corrosion
products into two consecutive adjacent porous media. This module uses a
nonequidistant spatial grid in order to treat adequately (with an
increased precision) the important region near the corroding surface.
The second demonstration PDM treats in a simplified way a gas generation
in a closed space and its diffusion out through a narrow pipe. The third
deals with an idealized model of stochastic surface growth, and the
fourth with the Brusselator model of the mathematical biology. 

Mirek Kolar		kolar@pangea.ca
http://www.pangea.ca/~kolar/


From ps@ocisgi7.unizh.ch  Thu Dec 19 04:10:41 1996
Received: from rzusuntk.unizh.ch  for ps@ocisgi7.unizh.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA29632; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 03:17:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ocisgi7.unizh.ch by rzusuntk.unizh.ch (4.1/SMI-4.1.14)
	id AA22326; Thu, 19 Dec 96 09:17:44 +0100
Received: by ocisgi7.unizh.ch (950215.SGI.8.6.10/920502.SGI)
	 id JAA04210; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:17:43 +0100
From: ps@ocisgi7.unizh.ch (Serge Pachkovsky)
Message-Id: <199612190817.JAA04210@ocisgi7.unizh.ch>
Subject: Re: CCL:G:spherical -> cartesian gaussians
To: jim@gnosis.chem.queensu.ca (Jim Clark)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:17:43 +0100 (MET)
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.961218190434.14911B-100000@gnosis.chem.queensu.ca> from "Jim Clark" at Dec 18, 96 07:14:16 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



> I have a wavefunction written in terms of spherical gaussian primitives 
> and I would like to rewrite it in terms of cartesian gaussians.  As you 
> would expect, I'm having no problem with s-type and p-type primitives but 
> I'm already having trouble keeping the wavefunction normalized when using 
> a d-shell of primitives.  

H.B. Schlegel, M.J. Frisch, "Transformation Between Cartesian and Pure
Spherical Harmonic Gaussians", Int. J. Quantum. Chem., vol. 54, pp. 83-87 (1995).

Regards,

/Serge.P

From ypwitkow@cyf-kr.edu.pl  Thu Dec 19 04:28:16 1996
Received: from info.cyf-kr.edu.pl  for ypwitkow@cyf-kr.edu.pl
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA29683; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 03:46:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl (5294@kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl [149.156.4.10])
          by info.cyf-kr.edu.pl (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id JAA12041 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:46:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ypwitkow@localhost)
          by kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id JAA17285; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:45:51 +0100 (MET)
From: Lucyna Kunert-Witkowska <ypwitkow@cyf-kr.edu.pl>
Message-Id: <199612190845.JAA17285@kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl>
Subject: Summary: MOPAC 93 on HP or SGI
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:45:50 +0100 (MET)
Cc: ypwitkow@kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl (Lucyna Kunert-Witkowska)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text


Dear all,
Yesterday I posted a question about availibility of MOPAC 93 on HP or
SGI platforms. Thank you VERY MUCH for all answers.
Especially:
 James J. P. Stewart
 Park, TAE-YUN
 George P. Ford
 Dr. Satyam Priyadarshy
 Chris Borrill  (thank you for Makefile!)
 Peter Blandon
 Dr. Jose Santiago Duca
 Rainer Koch
 Georg Ostertag
 
 I can summarize that this version of MOPAC 93 is truly portable and 
is running successfully on HP, SGI ONYX (IRIX 6.1), IBM (AIX 4.1)
and DEC Alpha platforms. The only modification is needed in Makefile
and in date and time functions. Compilation for SGI needs -static 
option.

Thank you again and wish you all VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR!

                 Lucyna Witkowska
-- 
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\  
  Lucyna Witkowska                      Academic Computer Centre
  ypwitkow@cyf-kr.edu.pl                CYFRONET-Krakow,
  http://www.cyf-kr.edu.pl/~ypwitkow/   Nawojki 11,30-950 Krakow,Poland 

From gertvh@sci.kun.nl  Thu Dec 19 06:10:38 1996
Received: from wn1.sci.kun.nl  for gertvh@sci.kun.nl
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id GAA00217; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 06:06:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mlfsilly.sci.kun.nl by wn1.sci.kun.nl
	via mlfsilly.sci.kun.nl [131.174.81.1] with SMTP for <@wn1.sci.kun.nl:CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
	id MAA09129 (8.8.4/3.12); Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:05:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: by mlfsilly.sci.kun.nl (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id MAA17927; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:12:48 +0100
From: "Gert von Helden" <gertvh@sci.kun.nl>
Message-Id: <9612191212.ZM17925@mlfsilly.sci.kun.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:12:46 +0100
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 26oct94 MediaMail)
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Bond length in solid and gas phase
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hi everybody,
I would be interested if there is a 'rule of thumb' about differences
in bond length (and angles) between solid and gase phase organic
molecules. Specifically, we are interested in diphenylamine and would
like to know if one can use the solid state (x-ray) data and somehow
scale it to a gas phase value.

Thanks,   Gert

-- 

Gert von Helden  
Dept. of molecular and Laser Physics, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands
e-mail: gertvh@sci.kun.nl, phone: (+31) 24 3652179, fax: (+31) 24 3653311


From peon@medchem.dfh.dk  Thu Dec 19 08:10:41 1996
Received: from danpost.uni-c.dk  for peon@medchem.dfh.dk
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA01863; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 08:03:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from medchem.dfh.dk (medchem.dfh.dk [130.225.177.15]) by danpost.uni-c.dk (8.7.5/8.6) with SMTP id OAA23626; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 14:03:02 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [130.225.177.59] (compmac2 [130.225.177.59]) by medchem.dfh.dk (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA11025; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 14:26:44 +0100
Message-Id: <v01540b02aedee9822abc@[130.225.177.59]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 14:03:02 +0100
To: "Gert von Helden" <gertvh@sci.kun.nl>
From: peon@medchem.dfh.dk (Per-Ola Norrby)
Subject: Re: CCL:Bond length in solid and gas phase
Cc: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net


        Hi Gert,

>I would be interested if there is a 'rule of thumb' about differences
>in bond length (and angles) between solid and gase phase organic
>molecules.

        We can actually do better than a rule of thumb.  MM3 (that is,
Allingers original MM3, none of the copies, this is the Mac version) can
calculate the difference between bond lengths from different determination
methods, at least the part that is due to centrifugal distortion and
anharmonic vibration.  I guess this is sufficient?  It still gives nuclear
distances, so it's not appropriate for X-ray hydrogens for example, but the
difference between electron density center and nuclear position shouldn't
be significant for heavy atoms in the X-ray (I'm not entirely sure how much
the nitrogen lone pair will affect the position in the X-ray though).

>Specifically, we are interested in diphenylamine and would
>like to know if one can use the solid state (x-ray) data and somehow
>scale it to a gas phase value.

        One problem here, the usual with MM3.  We don't have all
parameters.  However, using an "amide" (sp2) nitrogen and guessing a single
parameter, I calculated the following table for diphenyl amine:

                VIBRATIONAL AMPLITUDE AND CENTRIFUGAL DISTORTION
                   CONTRIBUTION TO THE BOND LENGTH

           BOND             R(g)      R(z)     R(alp)     R(e)      R(a)
       2( C)-  1( C)       1.3966    1.3926    1.3849    1.3888    1.3951
       3( C)-  2( C)       1.3975    1.3936    1.3825    1.3897    1.3960
       4( C)-  3( C)       1.4009    1.3963    1.3786    1.3930    1.3994
       5( C)-  4( C)       1.3966    1.3926    1.3849    1.3888    1.3951
       6( C)-  1( C)       1.3959    1.3909    1.3731    1.3881    1.3944
       6( C)-  5( C)       1.3960    1.3913    1.3781    1.3883    1.3946
       7( H)-  1( C)       1.1032    1.0855    1.0749    1.0805    1.0978
       8( H)-  2( C)       1.1008    1.0837    1.0711    1.0783    1.0954
       9( H)-  4( C)       1.1029    1.0859    1.0753    1.0802    1.0975
      10( H)-  5( C)       1.1033    1.0852    1.0701    1.0805    1.0979
      11( H)-  6( C)       1.1032    1.0857    1.0787    1.0805    1.0978
      12( N)-  3( C)       1.4247    1.4210    1.4156    1.4167    1.4232
      13( H)- 12( N)       1.0274    1.0106    1.0096    1.0078    1.0224
      14( C)- 12( N)       1.4247    1.4210    1.4156    1.4167    1.4232
      15( C)- 14( C)       1.3974    1.3934    1.3823    1.3896    1.3959
      16( C)- 15( C)       1.3967    1.3927    1.3850    1.3889    1.3952
      17( C)- 16( C)       1.3958    1.3908    1.3730    1.3880    1.3943
      18( C)- 17( C)       1.3961    1.3914    1.3782    1.3884    1.3947
      19( C)- 14( C)       1.4010    1.3964    1.3787    1.3932    1.3995
      19( C)- 18( C)       1.3965    1.3925    1.3848    1.3887    1.3950
      20( H)- 15( C)       1.1008    1.0837    1.0711    1.0783    1.0954
      21( H)- 16( C)       1.1032    1.0855    1.0749    1.0805    1.0978
      22( H)- 17( C)       1.1032    1.0857    1.0787    1.0805    1.0978
      23( H)- 18( C)       1.1033    1.0852    1.0701    1.0805    1.0979
      24( H)- 19( C)       1.1029    1.0859    1.0753    1.0802    1.0975

        The two first columns are gas phase values (expected from electron
diffraction and microwave), then comes expected X-ray values (thermal
averages of nuclear positions at 298 K), minimum energy nuclear positions
(appropriate for ab initio), and one more value I don't know exactly, but I
guess it's gas phase also (thermal average of distance with r-1 weighting).
Take your pick.  Even though absolute values may be off (one guessed
parameter, remember), relative ones should be OK.

        Per-Ola Norrby


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 *  Per-Ola Norrby
 *  The Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Dept. of Med. Chem.
 *  Universitetsparken 2, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
 *  tel. +45-35376777-506, +45-35370850    fax +45-35372209
 *  Internet: peon@medchem.dfh.dk, http://compchem.dfh.dk/



From raeker@saturn.kent.edu  Thu Dec 19 11:10:41 1996
Received: from saturn.kent.edu  for raeker@saturn.kent.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA02527; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:17:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by saturn.kent.edu (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA18220; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:04:35 -0500
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:04:35 -0500 (EST)
From: "Todd J. Raeker" <raeker@saturn.kent.edu>
To: CCL <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: CCL:  Need OpenGL code for Molecule Display
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.961219100335.19494A-100000@saturn.kent.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Graphics Programmers,

  Does anyone have sample OpenGL code for 3D display of molecules 
(stick, ball and stick, or CPK) that they would be willing to share.  I 
am working on a GUI for some of my programs and would like to include 
display of molecules and density surfaces.  I can do the coding 
myself but it would take some of my very precious time I have little to 
spare these days.  Thanks for any help.

Regards. 
Todd.


Dr. Todd J. Raeker                    Department of Chemistry
Theoretical Chemistry Group           Kent State University
raeker@saturn.kent.edu                Kent, OH 44242-0001
http://www.saturn.kent.edu/Raeker
Phone (216)-672-2986           



From yun.tang@csb.ki.se  Thu Dec 19 13:10:44 1996
Received: from e45.it.ki.se  for yun.tang@csb.ki.se
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA04440; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:32:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from thon.csb.ki.se (thon.csb.ki.se [130.237.204.199])
	by e45.it.ki.se (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP
	id SAA20762 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>;
	Thu, 19 Dec 1996 18:30:10 +0100 (MET)
Received: from pike.csb.ki.se by thon.csb.ki.se (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA15750; Thu, 19 Dec 96 18:35:25 +0100
Received: from sill.csb.ki.se by pike.csb.ki.se; (5.65/1.1.8.2/03May94-0316PM)
	id AA06991; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 18:32:10 +0100
Message-Id: <32B97BFF.2BB0@csb.ki.se>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 18:31:43 +0100
From: Yun Tang <yun.tang@csb.ki.se>
Reply-To: yun.tang@csb.ki.se
Organization: Karolinska Institute
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: How to perform MD on unstable protein?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear all,

When I performed molecular dynamics on a protein within a water sphere
using CHARMM program, the protein relaxed and became loose after 10ps.
The protein structure was extracted from a complex determined by NMR.
Then I performed MD on the complex, the protein also relaxed. Maybe the
protein is unstable. So my question is how to handle unstable protein in
order to perform MD. Any help that you could give me will be
appreciated!

Thanks in advance!

Season's greetings and best wishes to all!

Dr. Yun Tang
Karolinska Institute
email: yun.tang@csb.ki.se

