From jochen@pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de  Wed Apr 16 07:36:36 1997
Received: from sirene.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de  for jochen@pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA10824; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 07:13:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de by sirene.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de 
          with SMTP (PP) id <03877-0@sirene.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de>;
          Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:13:26 +0000
Received: by bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/06Jan97-0309PM) 
          id AA06900; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:13:16 +0200
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:13:16 +0200
From: Jochen Kuepper <jochen@pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Message-Id: <9704161113.AA06900@bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: spectra of ferrocene
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Md5: 3RmD1XJG5VqFnVVrpNCU/w==


Dear all,

does someone know any work (experiment or theory) concerning the UV/VIS =
spectrum=20
of ferrocene in the gas phase or in a jet ?

Greetings,
Jochen


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jochen Kuepper

  Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf   jochen@uni-duesseldorf.de
  Institut fuer Physikalische Chemie I
  Universitaetsstrasse 1, Geb 26.43.02.19   phone ++49-211-8113681
  40225 Duesseldorf                         fax   ++49-211-8115195
  Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

From dario@rs5.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it  Wed Apr 16 08:36:36 1997
Received: from rs5.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it  for dario@rs5.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA10942; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 08:04:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by rs5.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15375; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:03:58 +0100
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:03:58 +0100
From: dario@rs5.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it (Dario Bressanini)
Message-Id: <9704161303.AA15375@rs5.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Experimental Electron Affinity of Li2



Dear CCLers,

I am looking for the experimental value of the electron affinity
of the Li2 Molecule
any help?
dario bressanini

From hyzhang@scripps.edu  Wed Apr 16 15:36:40 1997
Received: from relay.scripps.edu  for hyzhang@scripps.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA13609; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from groucho.scripps.edu (groucho.scripps.edu [137.131.188.39])
	by relay.scripps.edu (8.8.5/TSRI-1.4) with ESMTP id LAA28682
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (hyzhang@localhost)
	by groucho.scripps.edu (8.8.5/TSRI-1.4) with SMTP id LAA19644
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hongyu Zhang <hyzhang@scripps.edu>
X-Sender: hyzhang@groucho
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: atomic-level knowledge-based potential
In-Reply-To: <199610071258.HAA12091@smb.chem.niu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970416112301.19642B-100000@groucho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear CCL'ers,

I am testing different atomic-level knowledge-based potential or Mean
Force Potential for protein folding. To avoid the reinvent of wheel, I
desire to get your help. If you happen to have the relevant code in hand,
could you please provide it to me ? BTW, a note of the relevant reference
to your code is also helpful to me. 

Thanks in advance !

Sincerely,

Hongyu Zhang

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hongyu Zhang (Henry), Ph.D.           | Tel: (619) 784-8831 (working)
Department of Molecular Biology, TPC5 | Tel: (619) 587-6759 (home)
The Scripps Research Institute        | Fax: (619) 784-8895
10550 North Torrey Pines Road         | Email: hyzhang@scripps.edu
La Jolla, California 92037            | URL:  http://www.scripps.edu/~hyzhang
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



From echamorr@pregrado.ciencias.uchile.cl  Wed Apr 16 16:36:40 1997
Received: from pregrado.ciencias.uchile.cl  for echamorr@pregrado.ciencias.uchile.cl
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id PAA14103; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from echamorr@localhost) by pregrado.ciencias.uchile.cl (8.6.12/8.6.9) id PAA14861; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:54:07 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:54:07 -0400 (CST)
From: "Eduardo Chamorro J." <echamorr@pregrado.ciencias.uchile.cl>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Inorganic Chemistry Software
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970416154844.14838A-100000@pregrado.ciencias.uchile.cl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




   Hello everybody,

I am interested in Software (comercial or free) for academic users 
devoted mainly to Inorganic Chemistry.  Thanks in advance for any 
information about it.

Regards,
		E. E. Chamorro J.

 _____________________________________________________________________
|     Eduardo E. Chamorro J.                                          |
|     Estudiante Programa de Doctorado en Quimica.     		      |
|     Departamento de Quimica, Centro de Mecanica Cuantica Aplicada   |
|     Facultad de Ciencias.  Universidad de Chile                     |
|     Las Palmeras 3425. NuNoa. Santiago de Chile		      |
|								      |
|     e-mail:  echamorr@pregrado.ciencias.uchile.cl		      |
|_____________________________________________________________________|


From lavelle@mbi.ucla.edu  Wed Apr 16 16:43:59 1997
Received: from MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU  for lavelle@mbi.ucla.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id QAA14249; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 16:08:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ewald.mbi.ucla.edu by MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (IBM MVS SMTP V2R2.1)
   with TCP; Wed, 16 Apr 97 13:08:57 PST
Received: from red5.mbi.ucla.edu by ewald.mbi.ucla.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/29Nov95-1114AM)
	id AA29693; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:08:38 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970416131111.006cb1fc@mbi.ucla.edu>
X-Sender: lavelle@mbi.ucla.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:11:11 -0700
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Laurence Lavelle <lavelle@mbi.ucla.edu>
Subject: ZINDO
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Hi,

ZINDO single point calculations give too high a conformational energy
difference (765 kcal/mol) for two conformations of the octahedral
coordination compound  [Ni(NCS)2(Py)4.

If anyone is aware of this "ZINDO problem" I would appreciate your comments.

Are there other packages (semi-empirical) that I can use to calculate the
single point energy of different conformations and compare with ZINDO results?


Thanks
Laurence Lavelle




"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Laurence Lavelle, Ph.D.
University of California Los Angeles
Laboratory of Structural Biology & Molecular Medicine
Molecular Biology Institute
Los Angeles, CA90095-1570, USA

Email:LAVELLE@MBI.UCLA.EDU
Phone:(310)206-8270
Fax:(310)825-0982
http://www.mbi.ucla.edu/people/lavelle/lavelle.html
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

From schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com  Wed Apr  9 04:38:38 1997
Received: from backup.hoechst.com  for schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA16892; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 03:38:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by backup.hoechst.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA18525; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 09:36:07 +0200
Received: from unknown(134.81.79.248) by backup via smap (V1.3)
	id sma018390; Wed Apr  9 09:14:06 1997
Received: from 134.81.76.36 by fra28.hiserv.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63)
	id 2DGSKGBT; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 09:20:42 +0200
Received: from h1tw0024 by h1tw0036 via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	 id JAA08278; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 09:15:21 +0200
Message-ID: <334B4209.3F54@h1tw0036.hoechst.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 09:15:21 +0200
From: "Dr. Heinz Schiffer" <schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com>
Organization: Hoechst Corporate Research & Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: youngd2@mail.auburn.edu,
        Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Chem Topic: Spin Contamination
References: <199704041351.HAA15120@wood.mail.auburn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



youngd2@mail.auburn.edu wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
>         I have written the following short essay for my users and am
> posting it here for your enjoyment and comments.  Please let me know
> if I missed any important points.
> 
>         My compilation of chemical topics can be accessed via the web
> at URL http://www.auburn.edu/~youngd2/topics/contents.html
> 
>                                 Dave Young
>                                 youngd2@mail.auburn.edu
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>                                 Spin Contamination
> 
>                                    David Young
> 
>                         Division of University Computing
>                                  144 Parker Hall
>                                 Auburn University
>                                 Auburn, AL 36849
> 
> WHAT IS SPIN CONTAMINATION
> 
>         Introductory descriptions of Hartree-Fock calculations (usually
> using Rootaan's SCF method) focus on singlet systems for which all
> electron spins are paired.  By assuming that the calculations is restricted
> to having two electrons per occupied orbital, the computation can be
> done relatively easily.  This is often referred to as a restricted
> calculation or RHF.
> 
>         For systems with a multiplicity other than one, it is not
> possible to use the RHF method as is.  Often an unrestricted SCF calculation
> (UHF) is performed.  In an unrestricted calculation, there are two complete
> sets of orbitals, one for the alpha electrons and one for the beta
> electrons.  Usually these two sets of orbitals use the same set of
> basis functions but different molecular orbital coefficients.
> 
>         The advantage of unrestricted calculations is that they can be
> performed very efficiently.  The disadvantage is that the wave function
> is no longer an eigenfunction of the total spin, <S**2>, thus some error
> may be introduced into the calculation.  This error is called spin
> contamination.
> 
> HOW DOES SPIN CONTAMINATION AFFECT RESULTS
> 
>         Spin contamination results in having orbitals which appear to be
> the desired spin state, but have a bit of some other spin state mixed in.
> This results in slightly lowering the computed total energy.  However,
> this lowering is an artifact of an incorrect wave function.  Since this
> is not a systematic error, the difference in energy between states will
> be adversely affected.  A high spin contamination can affect the geometry
> and population analysis and significantly affect the spin density.
> 
>         As a check for the presence of spin contamination, most ab initio
> programs will print out the expectation value of the total spin, <S**2>.
> If there is no spin contamination this should equal s(s+1) where s
> equals 1/2 times the number of unpaired electrons.  One rule of thumb which
> was derived from experience with organic molecule calculations is that
> the spin contamination is negligible if the value of <S**2> differs from
> s(s+1) by less than 10%.  Although this provides a quick test, it is
> always advisable to double check the results against experimental
> evidence or more rigorous calculations.
> 
>         Unrestricted calculations often incorporate a spin annihilation
> step which removes a large percentage of the spin contamination from
> the wave function at some point in the calculation.  This helps minimize
> spin contamination but does not completely prevent it.  The final value
> of <S**2> is always the best check on the amount of spin contamination
> present.  In Gaussian, the option "iop(6/15=2)" tells the program to
> use the annihilated wave function to produce the population analysis.
> I am not aware of any programs that use the annihilated wave function
> to perform the geometry optimization.
> 
> RESTRICTED OPEN SHELL CALCULATIONS
> 
>         It is possible to run spin-restricted open shell calculations
> (ROHF).  The advantage of this is that there is no spin contamination.
> The disadvantage is that there is an additional cost in the form of
> CPU time required in order to correctly handle both singly occupied and
> doubly occupied orbitals and the interaction between them.  As a result
> of the mathematical method used, ROHF calculations give good total
> energies and wave functions but the singly occupied orbital energies
> don't rigorously obey Koopman's theorem.
> 
>         When it has been shown that the errors introduced by spin
> contamination are unacceptable, restricted open shell calculations
> are the best way to get a reliable wave function.
> 
>         Within the Gaussian program, restricted open shell calculations
> can be performed for Hartree-Fock, density functional theory, MP2 and some
> semiempirical wave functions.  The ROMP2 method does not yet support
> analytic gradients, thus the fastest way to run the calculation is as a
> single point energy calculation with a geometry from another method.
> If a geometry optimization must be done at this level of theory, a
> non-gradient based method such as the Fletcher-Powell optimization
> must be used (note that the G94 manual implies that this may not still be
> functional for all cases).
> 
> SPIN PROJECTION METHODS
> 
>         Another approach is to run an unrestricted calculation then
> project out the spin contamination after the wave function has been
> obtained (PUHF, PMP2).  This gives a correction to the energy, but does not
> improve other properties.
> 
>         A spin projected result does not give the energy obtained by
> using a restricted open shell calculation.  This is because the
> unrestricted orbitals were optimized to describe the contaminated state
> rather than being optimized to describe the spin projected state.
> 
> HALF-ELECTRON APPROXIMATION
> 
>         Semiempirical programs often use the half electron approximation
> for radical calculations.  The half electron method is a mathematical
> technique for treating a singly occupied orbital in an RHF calculation.
> This results in a consistent total energy at the expense of having an
> approximate wave function and orbital energies.  Since a single determinant
> calculation is used, there is no spin contamination.
> 
>         The consistent total energy makes it possible to compute
> singlet-triplet gaps using RHF for the singlet and the half electron
> calculation for the triplet.  Koopman's theorem is not obeyed for half
> electron calculations.  Also, no spin densities can be obtained.
> The Mulliken population analysis is usually fairly reasonable.
> 
> FURTHER INFORMATION
> 
> Some discussion and results are in
> W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. v.R. Schleyer, J. A. Pople "Ab Initio Molecular
> Orbital Theory" Wiley (1986)
> 
> An article that compares unrestricted, restricted and projected results is
> M. W. Wong, L. Radom J. Phys. Chem. 99, 8582 (1995)
> 
> Some specific examples and a discussion of the half electron method are
> given in
> T. Clark "A Handbook of Computational Chemistry" Wiley (1985)
> 
> A more mathematical treatment can be found in the paper
> J. S. Andrews, D. Jayatilake, R. G. A. Bone, N. C. Handy, R. D. Amos
> Chem. Phys. Lett. 183, 423 (1991)
> 

Hi David,

What about restricted ( spin-unpolarized in the language of solid state
physicists ) DFT calculations ? As far as I understand, that is
not possible : John A. Pople, Peter M. W. Gill, Nicholas C. Handy,
J. Comput. Chem. 56 (1995) 303-305. But it seams to me that this is not
a problem, because the spin contamination of DFT methods are far less
than UHF and in most cases are virtually spin pure. The only problem
arises for the calculation of the multiplet states corresponding to
degenerate configurations, like p**2 for atoms or pi**2 for diatomic
molecules (e.g. oxygene): Here it is not possible (by definition !) to
calculate the lowest singlet states by UHF or unrestricted DFT methods 
with real orbitals (with complex orbitals it is possible). Another
problem with restricted calculations (ROHF or spin-unpolarized DFT, the
latter sometimes called RKS, restricted Kohn-Sham) is the incorrect
dissociation behaviour : The RHF potential energy curve of H2
dissociates not into 2 H radicals but into a mixture of H radicals
and H+ and H-. The same is true for RKS, but less pronounced. With
UHF or UKS you always get the right dissociation behaviour. For
very (!!!) nice discussions see : I. Mayer, On the behaviour of the
UHF method near the "critical" point", Acta Physica Hungarica
54(3-4) (1983) 249-266, and Michael Cook, Martin Karplus, Electron
Correlation and Density-Functional Methods, J. Phys. Chem. 91
(1987) 31-37. For an instructive application of the UHF method
to the potential energy surface of F2 see : Mark S. Gordon, Donald
G. Truhlar, The Hartree-Fock disoociation of F2, Theor. Chim. Acta
71 (1987) 1-5. And last but not least 2 papers discussing the problems
to compute degenerate ground states with DFT : Isaac B. Bersuker,
Limitations of Density Functional Theory in Application to
Degenerate States, J. Comput. Chem. 18(2) (1997) 260-267 and
E. J. Baerends, V. Branchadell, M. Sodupe, Atomic reference energies
for density functional calculations, Chem. Phys. Lett. 265 (1997) 
481-489.

Ciao
Heinz
-- 
Dr. Heinz Schiffer		Phone   ++49-69-305-2330
Hoechst CR&T			Fax     ++49-69-305-81162
Scientific Computing, G864	Email   schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com
65926 Frankfurt am Main		        schiffer@msmwia.hoechst.com


From eslone@patriot.net  Wed Apr 16 16:53:12 1997
Received: from jefferson.patriot.net  for eslone@patriot.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id PAA14041; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:46:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eric (th-0-45.patriot.net [206.151.9.54]) by jefferson.patriot.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA22250 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:44:33 -0400
Message-ID: <33552CB5.5627@patriot.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:47:01 -0400
From: "J. Eric Slone" <eslone@patriot.net>
Reply-To: eslone@patriot.net
Organization: Scientific Consulting Services
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: MM2 Programming Library
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi:

We are making our MM2 routines available as a Windows DLL for use in
your programs.  This DLL can be readily incorporated into C, C++,
Delphi, Visual Basic, etc. programs.  Both a SINGLE USER and DEVELOPER
license are available at very affordable prices.  

For more information please contact me at the address below.

Thanks,
Eric 
___________________________________________________________________

 J. Eric Slone
 Scientific Consulting Services
 5500 Holmes Run Parkway, Suite 501
 Alexandria, Virginia  22304-2851
            
 Phone:  (703) 461-7078                  mailto:eslone@patriot.net
 Fax:    (703) 751-6639        http://www.patriot.net/users/eslone
___________________________________________________________________
  "Nature uses only the longest threads to weave her patterns, so
   each small piece of her fabric reveals the organization of the
   entire tapestry."  Richard P. Feynman

From slawek@alchmist.scs.uiuc.edu  Wed Apr  9 15:35:13 1997
Received: from labrador.scs.uiuc.edu  for slawek@alchmist.scs.uiuc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA20722; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 14:59:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from piglet.scs.uiuc.edu (piglet.scs.uiuc.edu [130.126.227.130]) by labrador.scs.uiuc.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with SMTP id OAA14098 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 14:01:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by piglet.scs.uiuc.edu with Microsoft Mail
	id <01BC44EE.4B496E20@piglet.scs.uiuc.edu>; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 13:59:51 -0500
Message-ID: <01BC44EE.4B496E20@piglet.scs.uiuc.edu>
From: Slawomir Janicki <slawek@alchmist.scs.uiuc.edu>
To: "'CCL'" <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: drawings
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 13:59:50 -0500
Encoding: 49 TEXT



Take a look at SymApps from SoftShell (www.softshell.com). There should be a new version out really soon.

Slawek Janicki
slawek@alchmist.scs.uiuc.edu

-----Original Message-----
From:	chemistry-request [SMTP:chemistry-request@www.ccl.net]
Sent:	Monday, April 07, 1997 7:30 PM
To:	chemistry
Subject:	CCL:drawings



Dear CCL subscribers,

I am looking for a free, simple, programme which generates 3D ball-and-stick
pictures of small molecules (< 30 atoms), suitable for publication, starting
from, e.g. Gaussian Output files or XMol xyz cartesian coordinate files.
Possible corresponding OSs are Windows NT (much preferred) or XWindows/UNIX.
The ouput should be in bitmap or (even better) vectorized form of some sort.
I know the Raswin/Rasmol program, but somehow it doesn't seem to be possible
to get the sort of picture I want. I also searched the web quite extensively
for something suitable, again without success. In the literature, everyone
seems to have nice pictures so they must come from somewhere !!?!
Many thanks, especially to anyone who can suggest a good solution.

Jeremy


Dr. Jeremy N. Harvey

Technische Universitaet Berlin
Institut fur Organische Chemie Sekretariat C4
Strasse des 17. Juni, 135
D-10623 BERLIN
Tel. (49) 030 314 26546
Fax. (49) 030 314 21102
harvey@www.chem.tu-berlin.de



---
Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
             Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
---




From bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it  Wed Apr  9 07:35:02 1997
Received: from ssmain.uniss.it  for bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA17635; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 07:25:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from antas.agraria.uniss.it by ssmain.uniss.it with SMTP
	(1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA227265069; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 13:24:29 +0200
Sender: bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it
Message-Id: <334B8A81.41C6@antas.agraria.uniss.it>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 13:24:33 +0100
From: bruno <bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it>
Organization: DISAABA University of Sassari
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; AIX 2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Harvey <harvey@www.chem.tu-berlin.de>
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:drawings
References: <1.5.4.32.19970407172934.0090bcb4@www.chem.tu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Jeremy Harvey wrote:
> 
> Dear CCL subscribers,
> 
> I am looking for a free, simple, programme which generates 3D ball-and-stick
> pictures of small molecules (< 30 atoms), suitable for publication, starting
> from, e.g. Gaussian Output files or XMol xyz cartesian coordinate files.
> Possible corresponding OSs are Windows NT (much preferred) or XWindows/UNIX.
> The ouput should be in bitmap or (even better) vectorized form of some sort.
> I know the Raswin/Rasmol program, but somehow it doesn't seem to be possible
> to get the sort of picture I want. I also searched the web quite extensively
> for something suitable, again without success. In the literature, everyone
> seems to have nice pictures so they must come from somewhere !!?!
> Many thanks, especially to anyone who can suggest a good solution.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
Dear Jeremy,
	what you probably need is a rendering program such as Raster3d (home
page at: http://www.bmsc.washington.edu/raster3d/raster3d.html)
The use of this software needs a little work as you need to convert your
input files to pdb and the figures are generated as tiff or other
format, so you need a viewer for them. Anyway the above site has all
infos you need.
	Another opportunity is to use PovChem (at
http://ludwig.scs.uiuc.edu/~paul/PovChem.html) which is a
semi-interactive program. You need to have POV (Persistence of Vision)
installed /see infos at the PovChem site). The PovChem site have also a
few links to similar programs.
	We also hold a list of software useful to the computational chemist on
our site so you may have a look to the software page
(http://antas.agraria.uniss.it), you'll found the above programs plus
some other.
	Most of the nice pictures you see on the web and on journals 
are drawn by commercial packages. If you perform QM computations at both
ab initio and semiempirical level you may found useful to look at
SPARTAN ( http://www.wavefun.com/spartan/spartan.html )

	Hope it helps
	Regards
	Bruno
Dr Bruno Manunza
DISAABA (Dept. of Agricultural Environm. Sci)
University of Sassari
V.le Italia 39
07100 Sassari, ITALY
phone: 39 79 229215
fax:   39 79 229276
e-mail: bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it
e-mail: bruno@tharros.dipchim.uniss.it
e-mail: gx6bot81@cray.cineca.it
web: http://antas.agraria.uniss.it


From gadre@chem.unipune.ernet.in  Wed Apr  9 10:35:07 1997
Received: from sangam.ncst.ernet.in  for gadre@chem.unipune.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA18459; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 10:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from iucaa (iucaa.ernet.in [144.16.31.4]) by sangam.ncst.ernet.in (8.7.5) with SMTP id TAA19126 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 19:33:37 +0530 (GMT+05:30)
Received: from unipune.ernet.in by iucaa (5.65v3.2/SMI-4.1)
	id AA28142; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 19:24:57 +0500
Received: from chem.unipune.ernet.in by unipune.ernet.in (8.8.5/UNIPUNE-HUB-2.4.97)
	id TAA13432; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 19:25:16 -0500 (GMT)
Received: by chem.unipune.ernet.in (8.7.5/SMI-SVR4)
	id TAA09426; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 19:38:12 -0500
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 19:38:12 -0500
From: gadre@chem.unipune.ernet.in (Prof. Shridhar R. Gadre)
Message-Id: <199704100038.TAA09426@chem.unipune.ernet.in>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Propane-ammonia Cyclopropane-Ammonia




Dear Sirs :
We will appreciate receiving latest theoretical and
experimental references on cyclopropane-ammonia
and propane-ammonia complexes. Thanks......Shridhar Gadre


From MAILER-DAEMON@www.ccl.net  Wed Apr  9 11:35:06 1997
Received: from vega  for MAILER-DAEMON@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA18928; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 10:48:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199704091448.KAA18928@www.ccl.net>
Received: by vega
	(1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA158897234; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 16:47:14 +0200
From: laborde@vega
Subject: problems about installing MOPAC7
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 16:47:13 METDST
X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 111.1]



	Hello,
	
we saw that you managed to install MOPAC7 on your HP computer.
we just tried to do the same, but... the compilation failed.
two problems:
	-apparently, the declaration -static is not recognized by our compilator
	-the option -line that we need to use the fonctions etime and fdate 
	does not work.
	
Could you try to help us solving these problems.

Thanks for all.

au revoir


From 94970459@tolka.dcu.ie  Wed Apr 16 17:36:43 1997
Received: from tolka.dcu.ie  for 94970459@tolka.dcu.ie
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id RAA15205; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 17:23:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by tolka.dcu.ie; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Feb96-0535PM)
	id AA29490; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:22:47 +0100
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:22:47 +0100 (BST)
From: patrick kane <94970459@tolka.dcu.ie>
To: HChem User <hyperchem@hyper.com>, HChem Supp <support@hyper.com>,
        CCL Every <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: HyperChem and Conjugate Gradient Search Methods
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970416220940.28875A-100000@tolka.dcu.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



 Hi,

 Page 213 of the HyperChem, version 4 manual states that with conjugate 
gradient search methods, a descent direction (to lower energy) is chosen 
by consdering [among other things - my brackets] the conjugate of the 
gradient which is initially the negative of the current gradient.

 Could someone please tell me what is meant by the CONJUGATE of a gradient.

 THanks in response for your replies.

 Rgds,
 Paddy.


*************************************************************************
*									*
*	Paddy Kane 			email: 94970459@tolka.dcu.ie    * 
* 	School of Chemical Sciences 	  				*
*	Dublin City University 		  Tel: 00-353-1-7045641		*
*	Dublin 9			  				*
*	Ireland.			  Fax: 00-353-1-7045503		*
*									*
*************************************************************************


From rvenable@deimos.cber.nih.gov  Wed Apr 16 18:36:42 1997
Received: from deimos.cber.nih.gov  for rvenable@deimos.cber.nih.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id SAA15458; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 18:18:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by deimos.cber.nih.gov with SMTP
	(1.37.109.14/16.2) id AA174488308; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 18:05:08 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 18:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rick Venable <rvenable@deimos.cber.nih.gov>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:problems about installing MOPAC7
In-Reply-To: <199704091448.KAA18928@www.ccl.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.95.970416175950.17375A-100000@deimos.cber.nih.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Wed, 9 Apr 1997 laborde@vega wrote:
> we saw that you managed to install MOPAC7 on your HP computer.
> we just tried to do the same, but... the compilation failed.
> two problems:
> 	-apparently, the declaration -static is not recognized by our compilator
> 	-the option -line that we need to use the fonctions etime and fdate 
> 	does not work.
> 	
> Could you try to help us solving these problems.

First, you should fix your mail client; laborde@vega is not a valid
Internet e-mail address except in your local domain.

The -static and -line options are not for the HP; they are probably for
the SGI platform (I know -static is).  The corresponding HP-UX f77 options
are -K and +U77, respectively.

--
Rick Venable                  =====\     |=|    "Eschew Obfuscation"
FDA/CBER Biophysics Lab       |____/     |=|
Bethesda, MD  U.S.A.          |   \    / |=|  ( Not an official statement or
rvenable@deimos.cber.nih.gov  |    \  /  |=|    position of the FDA; for that,
http://nmr1.cber.nih.gov/           \/   |=|    see   http://www.fda.gov  )


From webmaster@compuguide.org  Thu Apr 10 20:35:23 1997
Received: from tahiti.choice.net  for webmaster@compuguide.org
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id UAA00970; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 20:18:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from particle (bscholl.choice.net [207.87.82.88])
          by tahiti.choice.net (ChoiceNet 513-688-8600) with ESMTP
	  id AAA28126 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 00:20:58 GMT
Message-ID: <334D831C.BADC9988@compuguide.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 20:17:32 -0400
From: Blake Scholl <webmaster@compuguide.org>
Organization: GlobalWave Internet Technologies
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b3 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Software for PC/Windows NT
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1



Hi!

    I'm currently a student at Sycamore High School in Cincinnati,
Ohio.  I'm preparing for a Westinghouse Science Talent Search project
involving some computer-based molecular research.

    I was searching the web for computational chemistry resources and
came across this mailing list archive.  I'm looking for inexpensive
software or freeware that I can run on my PC to perform molecular
mechanics and ab inito calculations.

    Any suggestions or pointers would be sincerely appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Blake Scholl
webmaster@compuguide.org



From ccl@www.ccl.net  Fri Apr 11 11:52:24 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA05182; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 10:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dns1.uga.edu  for buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA13136; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 10:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: <buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu>
Received: from ibmnla.chem.uga.edu (ibmnla.chem.uga.edu [128.192.5.8]) by dns1.uga.edu (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id KAA08804; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 10:52:24 -0400
Received: from localhost by ibmnla.chem.uga.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15995; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 10:52:16 -0400
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 10:52:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: Joachim Schummer <Joachim.Schummer@geist-soz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Philosophy of Chemistry Journal
In-Reply-To: <334AF8F5.2072@geist-soz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.95.970411105109.11889A-100000@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear Dr. Schummer:
 I am very glad to know this site of dicussion
about philosophy of chemistry. I have a web page of my
dissertation with a chapter of "philosophy of 
computational quantum chemistry. The address is:

http://alphanla.chem.uga.edu/~buyong/philo/philo.html

=================================================================
Dr. Buyong Ma             buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu
Computational Center for Molecular Structure and Design
Department of Chemistry
University of Georgia
Athens, Georgia 30602 USA            Voice (706) 542-2044
=================================================================



On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Joachim Schummer wrote:

> 
> Journal Announcement "Philosophy of Chemistry"!
> 
> The former Bulletin of the German Working Group "Philosophy and
> Chemistry" has been extended to an online journal published at the
> University of Karlsruhe, Germany:
> 
> HYLE. An International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry
>         http://www.uni-karlsruhe.de/~philosophie/hyle.html
> 
> HYLE is dedicated to all philosophical aspects of chemistry. Detailed
> informations concerning scientific concept, subscription, and
> contributing to HYLE are available on the homepage.
> The former issues (1.1995, 2.1996) as well as a preview of 3.1997 are
> available.
> There is also a Collected Bibliography "Philosophy of Chemistry" (more
> than 1500 titles!) including articles on the history of theories, ideas,
> and concepts of chemistry.
> Web sites containing related links, new publications, and current
> activities in the philosophy of chemistry are in progress. (Please mail
> anything of interest to me).
> 
> Regards,
>                 Joachim Schummer
> 
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Joachim Schummer
> Institute of Philosophy, University of Karlsruhe
> Postfach 69 80, D-76128 Karlsruhe, GERMANY
> 
> 
> ---
> Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
> CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
> MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
> Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
>              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
> ---
> 
> 



From jstewart@iti2.net  Fri Apr 11 21:35:35 1997
Received: from cougar.iti2.net  for jstewart@iti2.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id UAA08603; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 20:57:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gj1-15.iti2.net (gj1-15.iti2.net [208.141.145.15]) by cougar.iti2.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA20385 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:59:52 -0600
Message-Id: <3.0.16.19691231170000.2d7fec12@iti2.net>
X-Sender: jstewart@iti2.net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (16)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 17:57:46 -0600
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
From: "James J. P. Stewart" <jstewart@iti2.net>
Subject: Analytical CI gradients in semiempirical programs
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



To reply again re Dr Pachkovsky's observations:

The "stationary point" he reports yields a heat of formation
of 178.33025 kcal/mol and a gradient norm of over 1 kcal/mol/A.
Geometry optimization results in a similar geometry, reported
by me earlier, with a H.o.F. of 178.32945, and a gradient norm
of 0.09 kcal/mol/A.

The geometry at 178.33025 kcal/mol is not a stationary point,
for two reasons.  First, it is 0.0008 kcal/mol above the
nearby "stationary point", and second, as Dr Pachkovsky points
out, the "stationary point" is, in fact, a hilltop.  The difference
in energy of the two geometries is reponsible for the large
GNORM reported by Dr Pachkovsky.

When I attempted to reduce the GNORM below 0.09 kcal/mol/A, the
geometry changed so as to lower the energy by a few tens of kcal/mol.

That the active space is incomplete can readily be shown by
rerunning the job with C.I.=4.  This results in a large decrease
in energy.  Dr Pachkovsky is correct in that the space is "complete"
as far as CI and gradient calculations are concerned, but because
the effect of increasing the size of the active space has a profound
effect on the results, the calculation is as useful as a single
point calculation on an arbitary geometry.

The fact that the gradient could be lowered to less than 0.1, in
accordance with Dr Pachkovsky's criterion, demonstrates the
falsity of the statement "This is not a legitimate reason for a
breakdown of analytical gradients."

Now to the program itself.  Dr Pachkovsky's data set contains the 
keyword PLCRT=0.0000001, which is not a keyword of MOPAC 93 or MOPAC 7.
This suggests that the program being used by Dr Pachkovsky was
modified after it was received from QCPE.  While MOPAC 93, Revision 2
is, as Dr Pachkovsky suggests, the "latest and greatest", it is not
invulnerable to damage caused by changing the source code.  This
might be the reason for the differences in results.

In case there is any doubt about the validity of Liotard's
analytical derivative method, here is a re-calculation of
Dr Pachkovsky's system in which the system is constrained to be
planar.  Users of MOPAC 93, Revision 2, are invited to repeat
this calculation.

And now that I am heading off to San Francisco, I beg leave to
back out of any further discussion on this topic.

Jimmy Stewart



                     SUMMARY OF  MNDO   CALCULATION

                                                            MOPAC  98.00


  C6  H6 
                                                       Fri Apr 11 18:40:14
1997
    1SCF  GRAD C.I.=2 ROOT=3 SINGLET PRECISE &
  T=1000000 MECI
 


     1SCF WAS SPECIFIED, SO BFGS WAS NOT USED                 
     SCF FIELD WAS ACHIEVED                                   


          HEAT OF FORMATION       =       178.329472 KCAL =    746.13051 KJ
          ELECTRONIC ENERGY       =     -3211.052760 EV      STATE: SINGLET
Ag  
          CORE-CORE REPULSION     =      2366.325464 EV
          GRADIENT NORM           =         0.000567
          DIPOLE                  =         0.00000 DEBYE    SYMMETRY:
 D2h 
          NO. OF FILLED LEVELS    =         15
          CONFIGURATION INTERACTION WAS USED
          IONIZATION POTENTIAL    =         8.654580 EV
          MOLECULAR WEIGHT        =        78.113
          SCF CALCULATIONS        =         1
          COMPUTATION TIME =   0.413 SECONDS


          FINAL GEOMETRY OBTAINED                                    CHARGE
    1SCF  GRAD C.I.=2 ROOT=3 SINGLET PRECISE &
  T=1000000 MECI
 
  C    0.00000000  0    0.0000000  0    0.0000000  0    0    0    0
-0.0603
  C    1.38675637  1    0.0000000  0    0.0000000  0    1    0    0
-0.0609
  C    1.54669847  1  119.6677872  1    0.0000000  0    2    1    0
-0.0609
  C    1.38675161  1  119.6677106  1    0.0000000  0    3    2    1
-0.0603
  C    1.38675663  1  120.6645001  1    0.0000000  0    4    3    2
-0.0609
  C    1.38675212  1  120.6645308  1    0.0000000  0    1    2    3
-0.0609
  H    1.09300947  1  119.6675465  1  180.0000000  0    1    2    3
0.0580
  H    1.08399943  1  123.4960132  1  180.0000000  0    2    1    3
0.0621
  H    1.08399997  1  116.8360371  1 -180.0000000  0    3    2    1
0.0621
  H    1.09300943  1  119.6680004  1  180.0000000  0    4    3    2
0.0580
  H    1.08399948  1  123.4959112  1  180.0000000  0    5    4    3
0.0621
  H    1.08399988  1  123.4962036  1  180.0000000  0    6    1    2
0.0621
 



From ccl@www.ccl.net  Sat Apr 12 01:35:38 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id AAA08916; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 00:57:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pasteur.sc.ucl.ac.be  for drossart@cico.ucl.ac.be
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id AAA03021; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 00:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from default (drossart.cico.ucl.ac.be) by pasteur.sc.ucl.ac.be (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA15330; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 06:59:15 +0200
Message-Id: <334F15F1.3487@cico.ucl.ac.be>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 06:56:17 +0200
From: DROSSART Claude <drossart@cico.ucl.ac.be>
Reply-To: drossart@cico.ucl.ac.be
Organization: U.C.L.-CICO/Chop
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: molecular-dynamics-news@mailbase.ac.uk, scheurwe@hq.nato.int,
        webtalk@teachers.net, safety@uvmvm.uvm.edu, chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: 4.24.97  ESOR VI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="esor2cir.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="esor2cir.txt"



Notes:- This message is being sent to multiple lists.
      - We attach the greatest value to Exhibit and Sponsorship opportuni=
ties.
      - Please help us to publicize ESOR VI by forwarding and/or posting =
this announcement on bulletin boards, list-servs, www sites, newsletters,=
 society publication calendars and your own distribution lists.
Thank you for your interest, help and cooperation !

ESOR-VI
-------
6th European Symposium on Organic Reactivity
All details on http://www.chim.ucl.ac.be/CHIM/ESOR.html
 (!case sensitive)

Louvain-la-Neuve      24 - 29 July 1997
_______________________________________

The Catholic University of Louvain, located in the Belgian city of Louvai=
n la Neuve, will host the next conference entitled "European =

Symposium on Organic Reactivity". This will be the sixth edition of a ser=
ies of successful meetings held in Paris (1987), Padova (1989), =

G=F6teborg (1991), Newcastle-upon-Tyne (1993) and  Santiago de Compostela=
  (1995).

Location
________
Louvain-la-Neuve is located about 30 km south of Brussels in the french-s=
peaking part of Belgium. =

The Conference site will be part of the academic facilities of the Cathol=
ic University of Louvain (U.C.L.). =


Scientific Programme
____________________
The meeting will be devoted to all aspects of physical organic chemistry.=

The conference programme will focus on three main topics :
1. 	Mechanisms and reactivity in organic, bioorganic and organometallic c=
hemistry, including theoretical approaches
2.	Photochemical and electron transfer activation processes
3. 	Molecular recognition and enzyme mechanism.

The programme will include 12 plenary lectures, two parallel sessions wit=
h their own invited lectures. A limited number of oral =

presentations will be selected among the submitted contributions. =

Two separate poster sessions are planned on Friday afternoon and Monday a=
fternoon with comfortable discussion times.
The Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry will devote an issue to the pub=
lication of proceedings of the Symposium. Active participants are invited=
 to submit their communications as short papers (4 pages in the Journal) =
to be included in this issue. Manuscripts (~10 pages) should be typed dou=
ble-spaced; an original and three copies, each one accompanied by artwork=
 should be supplied. They will be collected during the symposium and will=
 be evaluated by reviewers.

Plenary lectures
________________
Twelve well-known scientists hace agreed to give Plenary Lectures on the =
following topics :

V. Balzani,University of Bologna, Italy,
	Supramolecular photochemistry.

S.J. Benkovic,The Pennsylvania State University, USA,
	Perspective on biocatalysis.

F. Diederich,Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich,
	From supramolecular chemistry to medicinal chemistry.

J.B. Engberts,University of Groningen, The Netherlands,
	Vesicles formed from synthetic amphiphiles. =

	Fusogenic behavior and applications as drug carrier systems.

J. Fr=E9chet,California University - Berkeley, USA,
	Designing for novel macromolecular architectures:from concept to applica=
tions.

B.Giese,University of Basel, Switzerland,
	Reactivity of DNA radicals.

Y. Kishi,Harvard University, USA,
	Synthetic studies in the field of natural product chemistry.

H. Mayr,Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Germany,
	Linear free enthalpy relationship : a powerful tool for	the design of or=
ganic or organometallic syntheses.

R. Noyori,Nagoya University, Japan,
	Asymmetric hydrogenation : mechanistic aspects.

M. Poliakoff,University of Nottingham, U.K.,
	Intermediates in organometallic chemistry.

P. von Rague Schleyer,University of Erlangen-N=FCrnberg, Germany,
	Organic reactivity and computational chemistry.

I. Willner,The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel,
	Electroenzymes, photoenzymes and command surfaces - Tailored assemblies =
for optobioelectronic =

	devices.

Invited Lectures: two parallel sessions A & B
________________

Session A
C. Amatore (Ecole Normale Sup=E9rieure, France), Homogeneous catalysis by=
 Palladium complexes and electrochemistry.
P. Chen (E.T.H. Zurich, Switzerland), A physical organic journey from car=
benes and biradicals to drug design and catalysis. =

J.P. Guthrie (Western Ontario University, Canada), Predicting the rates o=
f organic reactions: a simple model using multidimensional Marcus theory.=

P.M. Maitlis (Sheffield University, UK), New explorations in metal cataly=
sed reactions.
A.-F. Noels (Universit=E9 de Li=E8ge, Belgium), From olefin cyclopropanat=
ion to olefin metathesis through catalyst engineering. Applications to fi=
ne organic synthesis and to polymer chemistry.
H.-U. Siehl (Ulm Universit=E4t, Germany), New results on quantum chemical=
 and experimental NMR investigations of carbocations. =

S. Steenken (Max Planck Institut M=FClheim, Germany), Generation of carbe=
nium ions by protonation of photochemically produced carbenes and ylides =
- their reactivities with nucleophiles.
O. Wennerstr=F6m (Chalmers Univ.Gothenburg, Sweden), Can one photon rearr=
ange many cis double bonds ?.
M. Yanez (Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain), Some anomalous reactivi=
ties in the gas phase. An MO theory rationalization.

Session B
E. Baciocchi (Univ.Roma la Sapienza, Italy), Mechanistic aspects of oxida=
tion reactions promoted by cytochrome P-450 and peroxydases.
D.R. Boyd (Queens University Belfast, North Ireland), Asymmetric oxidatio=
n: the dioxygenase-catalysed route.
N.E. Geacintov (New-York University, USA), Reactivities of mutagenic meta=
bolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with DNA: structural, photoch=
emical and biological consequences.
J.F. Kirsch (California University - Berkeley, USA), Genetic engineering =
approaches to enzyme design and mechanistic analysis. =

A. Marquet (Universit=E9 Paris 6, France), In vivo formation of C-S bonds=
: radical chemistry under reducing-conditions.
J. P=E9ri=E9 (Universit=E9 de Toulouse, France), Glycolytic enzymes: mech=
anistic studies and posible targets for new leads against parasitic disea=
ses. =

D.N. Reinhoudt (Twente Universiteit, The Netherlands), Aspects of supramo=
lecular chemistry.
J.P. Richard (University at Buffalo, USA), Mechanistic imperatives for en=
zymatic catalysis of aldol condensation and aldose-ketose isomerization r=
eactions.

Social Events
_____________
The social programme for Conference participants includes the following e=
vents :

Thursday :		Welcome drink and get-together sandwich buffet at lunchtime
Thursday evening :	Concert
Friday evening :	Belgian Cheese and Beer party at the end of the	poster s=
ession
Sunday afternoon :	Excursion to Brussels (New Art Horta, exhib.P.Delvaux,=
 brewery)
Monday evening :	Conference Dinner

A Programme for accompanying participant has been arranged for the whole =
conference period. =

Have a trip into Belgium by:
http://belgium.fgov.be
http://W3.win-uk.net/~belganet

Registration fees ( BEF Belgian francs) =

_________________
-before April 15, Normal 10 000, Industry 15 000, Student 5 000, Accompan=
ying partic. 2 000
-after April 15, Normal 12 500, Industry 18 000, Student 6 000, Accompany=
ing partic. 2 000

Acomodations
____________
Hotel reservation will be handled by LD Organisation (Mrs Lydie Differdin=
g)
 route de Blocry 55, 1348-Louvain la Neuve (Belgium), tel & fax: 32-(0)10=
=2E454777,
Email: lydie.differding@skynet.be
Details are on Esor Webpage.

Organizing Committees
_____________________
Local Organizing committee
--------------------------
Chairmen :Prof. J. Fastrez and Prof. L. Ghosez (U.C.L., Louvain la Neuve)=

Conference Secretary :Prof. M. Devillers (U.C.L., Louvain la Neuve)

Administration :Ing. C. Drossart (U.C.L., Louvain la Neuve)
Members : =

Dr.   O. B Nagy (U.C.L., Louvain la Neuve)
Prof. P. De Clercq (R.U.G., Gent)
Prof. F. De Schryver (K.U.L., Leuven)
Prof. L. Hevesi, (F.U.N.D.P., Namur)
Prof. F. Kirsch-Demesmaeker (U.L.B., Brussels)
Prof. A. Laschewsky (U.C.L., Louvain la Neuve)
Prof. J. Marchand-Brynaert (U.C.L., Louvain la Neuve)
Prof. J.-P. Soumillion (U.C.L., Louvain la Neuve)

International Advisory Committee
--------------------------------
Prof. P. Ahlberg (Chairman, G=F6teborg, Sweden)
Dr.   M. Eckert-Maksic (Zagreb, Croatia)
Prof. J. Engberts (Groningen, Netherlands)
Dr.   R. Leis (Santiago de Compostela, Spain)
Dr.   H. Maskill (Newcastle upon Tyne, England)
Prof. R. More O'Ferrall (Dublin, Ireland)
Prof. P. M=FCller (Gen=E8ve, Switzerland)
Prof. M. Page (Huddersfield, England)
Prof. Z. Rappoport (Jerusalem, Israel)
Prof. M.-F. Ruasse (Paris, France)
Prof. G. Scorrano (Padova, Italy)
Prof. U. Siehl (Ulm, Germany)

Sponsorship
-----------
Universit=E9 catholique de Louvain
Beun de Ronde B.V., Benelux
D.S.M. Research, The Netherlands
EG & G Instruments, Benelux (exhibitor)
Eurobug Computers Belgium
Exxon Chemical Europe
FUJI Film Belgium - Cin=E9bel Wavre Belgium
Group Tessenderlo Chemie Belgium
Institut de Recherche P.FABRE, France
Interbrew
Janssen Pharmaceutica Research Foundation, Belgium
Merck-Belgolabo, Belgium
Procter & Gamble
Sigma-Aldrich-Fluka, Belgium (exhibitor)
Thermo Separation Products Belgium (T.S.P.)
Union Chimique Belge
VEL Belgium


For further information, please refer to the Scientific Secretariat of th=
e Conference :

	Prof. M. Devillers,ESOR-VI Conference Secretary
	Catholic University of Louvain
	Laboratory of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
	1 place Louis Pasteur, B-1348 Louvain la Neuve , Belgium

	Tel. : 32-10 47 28 27	Fax :  32-10 47 28 36
	e-mail : devillers@inan.ucl.ac.be
or get a moment to see our page maintained by Claude Drossart at:
    http://www.chim.ucl.ac.be/CHIM/ESOR.html

To receive the Application Form for this Symposium, please print and fill=
 in the following form, send it to =

the Conference Secretary ( or an Email with the same information).
DO NOT SEND YOUR REPLY TO THE LIST !
_______________________________________________________________
Title :  Prof. -  Dr.  -  Mr.  -  Mrs.  (circle when applicable or cross =
out useless mention)
Name : =

____________________________________________________________
First Name : =

____________________________________________________________
Institution : =

____________________________________________________________
Address : =

____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
tel:_________________   fax:_____________________
e-mail:__________________________________________

I intend to present a short contribution
	preferably as oral presentation			 =

	preferably as a poster				 =

I have no preference between oral and poster presentation				 =






From lestaw.k.bieniasz@uni-tuebingen.de  Mon Apr 14 12:36:12 1997
Received: from outmail.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de  for lestaw.k.bieniasz@uni-tuebingen.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA24993; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 12:06:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from  by outmail.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (4.1/ZDV-Uni-Tuebingen-1.0)
	id AB14882; Mon, 14 Apr 97 18:06:12 MES
Received: from textserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de by mailserv.uni-tuebingen.de 
          with SMTP (PP); Mon, 14 Apr 1997 18:05:29 +0200
Received: (from coibi01@localhost) 
          by textserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA42046;
          Mon, 14 Apr 1997 18:05:25 +0200
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 18:05:22 +0200 (MSZ)
From: "Lestaw K. Bieniasz" <lestaw.k.bieniasz@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: computational chemistry
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.970414165617.50195B-100000@textserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




					Tuebingen, 14.04.97

Dear Computational Chemists,

    I am new to this list, so please excuse me if questions similar to 
those asked below have already been discussed. I need very much your help 
and advice.

    Let me first introduce myself. For about 18 years my research has 
been associated with the computer modelling of the transient experiments 
in electrochemical kinetics. Briefly speaking this usually consists in 
solving sets of reaction-diffusion partial differential equations with 
various complications. I think my work has evolved from something one 
might classify as applications of various computational methods to very 
concrete electrochemical problems, to a more general approach, in which I 
am trying to:

(a) Design universal computational strategies aplicable to a large class 
of electrochemical kinetic problems.

(b) Pay more attention to the analysis of the computational methods 
themselves, having in mind particular requirements of the electrochemical 
kinetics.

(c) Better understand various rational procedures and reasoning processes 
that are used in electrochemical kinetics, with the aim to enable automating
these processes as much as possible, and represent them in the form
of computer algorithms.

(d) Elaborate a comprehensive problem-solving environment for 
electrochemical kinetic simulations, which apart from considering many 
example problems, involves also elements of algorithms/software design 
and pure programming. 

    I have to say I have never thought of how to formally classify
the above area of investigations, and I was quite satisfied with the fact 
that the reearch was interesting, seemingly modern and potentially very 
promising for the future, if one takes into account the enormous recent 
progress in computing technology. I also did not have much difficulties with 
publishing the results of my work, which additionally reinforced my good 
feeling that I have chosen the right direction. Unfortunately I am 
beginning to encounter criticism from the side of several chemists in my 
environment, who say that what I am doing is not electrochemistry, 
because there is so much numerical mathematics and computational science 
in my works. It seems that most electrochemists think that one needs to 
solve very specific electrochemical problems (like finding out what 
the mechanism of some reaction is, for example) in order to make progress in 
electrochemistry. They don't notice that one might also make a progress 
by making it possible that many tedious operations that the 
electrochemists had so far to do by hand, can now be done easily and 
rapidly by means of specially designed computer programs. They don't seem 
to notice that certain traditional research paradigms do not longer make 
much sense (for example, publishing long derivations for some kinetic 
models in the situation when a properly designed program might even 
create a whole paper automatically). These problems have drawn my 
attention to the issue of how to classify and better justify my work,
and here go my questions:

(1) My first idea was to say that I am doing computational chemistry.
By analogy with computational physics which practically includes 
everything that has to do with physics and computers simultaneously, I 
would expect that my area of investigations might be called computational
electrochemistry. Logically, if computational chemistry is now a part
of chemistry, then I might keep saying that my area of interest belongs
to electrochemistry. How much I was mistaken, though! Most of the 
computational chemists seem to put an equality sign between
quantum mechanical calculations and computational chemistry, as if there 
existed no other possible uses of computers in chemistry. For example, 
the Journal of Computational Chemistry publishes almost exclusively 
quantum mechanical stuff. This fact was even reflected in one of the 
first definitions of computational chemistry cited in the preface to 
"Reviews of Computational Chemistry", vol. 1: "Use of molecular orbital 
theorems to determine structure and properties of molecules". 
Fortunately, the editors of this series officially accept a more elastic 
definition, and in vol. 2 they write: "The quantitative modelling of 
of chemical phenomena by computer-implemented techniques is how we view 
the scope of the field, so it includes practically all aspects of 
chemical research that are expedited or rendered practical by computers".
However, in the entire set of reviews (7 volumes) I have managed to trace 
down only one article mentioning briefly some chemical kinetic simulation 
program. The entire huge area of kinetic modelling seems therefore not to 
exist in the consciousness of the computational chemists, as a part of 
their area. I would be glad to know what you, the CCL subscribers, think 
about this. 

(2) After thinking for a while about point (1) I have started to have some 
doubts, though. It might be that I do not precisely understand the 
meaning of the word "computational", but for me it seems to mean something 
close to "numerical calculations", whereas computers can do much more. 
For example, they can do logical operations, largely used in AI methods,
e.g. in expert systems. Also, neural networks are becoming 
increasingly popular in solving chemical problems, not necessarily 
computational, but perhaps "intellectual", such as pattern recognition, 
signal processing, machine learning for chemical purposes.
I feel a more general term like "computer-aided chemistry" would be more 
adequate to describe the current developments at the junction 
computers+chemistry. What do you think?

(3) To further extend point (2), I'd like to quote Allen Newell, an AI 
expert [cf. D.G.Bobrow and P.J.Hayes, Artif. Intelligence 25(1985)3.]:
"We should, by the way, be prepared for some radical, and perhaps 
surprising, transformations of the disciplinary structure of science 
(technology included) as information processing pervades it. In 
particular, as we become more aware of the detailed information processes 
that go on in doing science, the sciences will find themselves 
increasingly taking a metaposition, in which doing science (observing, 
experimenting, theorizing, testing, archiving,...) will involve 
understanding these processes, and building systems that do the 
object-level science."
Isn't this what is happening now? Unfortunately, Allen Newell was not a 
chemist, so that I can't use this argument to convince chemists. Does 
anybody of you know about similar opinions being expressed by chemists?
If possible, by prominent chemists? I'd be happy to know (references or 
addresses, please!) Or perhaps I am wrong, and even you, the declared 
computational chemists, do not share the above opinion, and you rather 
prefer to put clear dividing lines between all chemical and 
computational aspects of the computational chemistry, seeing only 
applications of computational science to chemistry, instead of a new 
emerging area that combines both aspects? Do you use to say, "before 
lunch we shall solve some chemical problem, and afternoon we shall work a 
litle on numerical methods" ?

(4) By the way, do you know any papers, materials, internet resources, etc. 
devoted to the predictions of how the use of computers in chemistry (and 
in other natural sciences) may look like in the nearest decades? I'd like 
to find such predictions.

(5) I wonder how those of you, who may possibly develop chemical expert 
systems, classify your research. Do you think that a research on what can 
be regarded as sound reasoning in chemistry is a subject belonging to 
chemistry? Or to computational science? What do the referees of your 
research proposals, and sponsors think about it?

I hope I am not taking too much of your (computational) time.

				Yours sincerely

							L.Bieniasz

*-------------------------------------------------------------------*
|                        Dr. Leslaw Bieniasz                        |
| temporary address: (3rd April 1997 - 31st August 1997)            |
|       Institut fuer Organische Chemie, Universitaet Tuebingen     |
|          Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.       |
|              E-mail: lestaw.k.bieniasz@uni-tuebingen.de           |
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*
| permanent address:                                                |
| Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Polish Academy of Sciences,| 
| Molten Salts Laboratory, ul. Zagrody 13, 30-318 Cracow, Poland.   | 
|                   E-mail:  nbbienia@cyf-kr.edu.pl                 |
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*







From ccl@www.ccl.net  Tue Apr 15 12:36:24 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA02191; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 12:29:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from comsun.rz.uni-regensburg.de  for herbert.homeier@rchs1.chemie.uni-regensburg.de
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA03853; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 12:29:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rchs1.chemie.uni-regensburg.de by comsun.rz.uni-regensburg.de with SMTP id AA14703
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>); Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:29:21 +0200
Received: by rchs1.chemie.uni-regensburg.de (4.1/URRZ-sub (1.5))
	id AA13198; Tue, 15 Apr 97 19:26:57 +0200
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 97 19:26:57 +0200
From: Herbert Homeier t4720 <herbert.homeier@chemie.uni-regensburg.de>
Message-Id: <9704151726.AA13198@rchs1.chemie.uni-regensburg.de>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net, chem-comp@mailbase.ac.uk,
        molecular-dynamics-news@mailbase.ac.uk,
        spectroscopy-group@mailbase.ac.uk, phocet-l@uva.nl
Subject: 1997, 09: (de) Elektronen- und Vibrations"uberg"ange in Metallkomplexen - Theorie und optische Spektren
Reply-To: joachim@theochem.uni-duesseldorf.de




Dear colleague, 

the following announcement might be of interest for you. It is also available online at
URL: http://www.chemie.uni-regensburg.de/pub/elmau3/elmau/elmau.html
I apologize if you receive this message several times, since it has been sent to various
mailing lists.

Yours sincerely

Herbert Homeier
--------------------------------------------------------------
Priv.-Doz. Dr. Herbert H. H. Homeier
Institut fuer Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie
Universitaet Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany
Phone: +49-941-943 4720  FAX: +49-941-943 4719/+49-941-943 2305
email: herbert.homeier@na-net.ornl.gov
WWW: http://www.chemie.uni-regensburg.de/~hoh05008
----------------------------------------------------------------------


           Elektronen- und Vibrations"uberg"ange in Metallkomplexen
                      - Theorie und optische Spektren -
                     Dritter Workshop: 28.9. bis 2.10.97
                          Schlo_ Elmau, Oberbayern

      Prof. Dr. Hartmut Yersin        Priv.-Doz. Dr. Joachim Degen
      Universit"at Regensburg         Heinrich-Heine-
      Institut f"ur Physikalische     Universit"at D"usseldorf
      und Theoretische Chemie         Institut f"ur Theoretische Chemie
      D-93040 Regensburg              D-40225 D"usseldorf
      Telefax: 0941 943 4488          Telefax: 0211 81 13466
      Telefon: 0941 943 4464          Telefon: 0211 81 13208

Metallkomplexe werden zunehmend in Zusammenhang mit photochemischen und
photophysikalischen Anwendungen diskutiert. Als Beispiele seien die
Photoresist-Technologie bei der Chip-Herstellung, optische Schalter und
Speicher, die photochemische Ausnutzung der Sonnenenergie, neue
Photovoltaic-Systeme, die Antitumortherapie, supra-molekulare Systeme, sowie
die heterogene Katalyse und Hochtemperatur-Supraleitung genannt.

Bevor ein breiter technologischer Einsatz mvglich ist, sind allerdings noch
wesentliche Fragen zu kl"aren, die insbesondere die Eigenschaften der
beteiligten elektronischen Zustdnde betreffen, denn diese bestimmen
weitgehend z.B. das photochemische Verhalten. In j"ungster Zeit lassen sich
jedoch durch den Einsatz von Methoden der Spektroskopie, der Quantentheorie
sowie numerischer Verfahren Einblicke gewinnen, aufgrund derer eine gezielte
Pr"aparation von Substanzen mit den gew"unschten Eigenschaften m"oglich wird.
Derartige L"osungsans"atze finden bisher noch nicht die angemessene Resonanz.

Die beiden ersten Workshops 1993 mit 25 und 1994 mit "uber 30 Teilnehmern
unter starker internationaler Beteiligung erwiesen sich als so erfolgreich,
da"s aufgrund neuester Entwicklungen sowohl auf theoretischer als auch
experimenteller Seite f"ur 1997 eine weitere Veranstaltung geplant ist. Diese
hat zum Ziel, ein wissenschaftliches Forum zu schaffen, auf dem die
obengenannten Fragestellungen diskutiert werden. Dieses Forum soll besonders
M"oglichkeiten f"ur individuelle Kontakte zwischen international anerkannten
Wissenschaftlern aus dem In- und Ausland mit Diplomanden und Doktoranden
bieten. Auf gro"sen Konferenzen ist dies kaum erreichbar.

Das Schlo"s Elmau liegt in 1000 m H"ohe sehr ruhig am Fu"se der
Wettersteinspitze, ca. 20 km von Garmisch-Partenkirchen entfernt. Die Wahl
des Tagungsortes wird zweifellos zu einer verbindlichen Atmosph"are
beitragen.

Die Tagungsgeb"uhr betrdgt 80,- DM, f"ur Studenten 40,- DM. Die Kosten f"ur die
Unterbringung mit Vollpension betragen 165,- DM pro Person/Nacht im DZ bzw.
195,- DM im EZ. Diplomanden und Doktoranden erhalten vom Freundeskreis der
Elmau e.V. einen Zuschu"s von 50,- DM/Nacht.

Note: Participants from foreign countries can probably obtain some financial
support.

The number of (active) participants is restricted to 30-40 persons.

                                  Programm

 Sonntag, 28.9.1997:                        Anreise (ab 16 Uhr) 18:30 Abendessen, Begr"u"sungsabend
 Montag, 29.9.1997 bis Mittwoch, 1.10.1997: Vortr"age und Posterpr"asentationen
 Donnerstag, 2.10.1997:                     Vortr"age, Mittagessen, Abreise

Bitte senden Sie die beiliegende Anmeldung m"oglichst umgehend, sp"atestens
bis zum 30. Juni 1997 (Deadline) an eine der angegebenen Adressen:

      Prof. Dr. Hartmut Yersin        Priv.-Doz. Dr. Joachim Degen
      Universit"at Regensburg         Heinrich-Heine-
      Institut f"ur Physikalische     Universit"at D"usseldorf
      und Theoretische Chemie         Institut f"ur Theoretische Chemie
      D-93040 Regensburg              D-40225 D"usseldorf
      Telefax: 0941 943 4488          Telefax: 0211 81 13466
      Telefon: 0941 943 4464          Telefon: 0211 81 13208

Bitte legen Sie der Anmeldung ein Abstract (maximal eine Seite) in
englischer Sprache bei. Bitte achten Sie auf eine gute technische Qualit"at.



Anmeldung

Anmeldung zum dritten Workshop auf Schlo"s Elmau. 28.9. bis 2.10.97

Anmeldetermin - Deadline 30.06.97.

The number of (active) participants is restricted to 30-40 persons.

Vorname, Name

Adresse

Anreise am:

Abreise am:

mit (Bahn/PKW):

EZ/DZ (ggf. mit wem):

Titel:

Poster / Kurzvortrag

Datum, Unterschrift







-------------------------------- end of message ------------------------------------


