From Gerald.Loeffler@univie.ac.at  Thu Jun 12 07:04:38 1997
Received: from mailbox.univie.ac.at  for Gerald.Loeffler@univie.ac.at
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id GAA20171; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 06:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gerilap.imp.univie.ac.at (gerilap.imp.univie.ac.at [131.130.80.125])
          by mailbox.univie.ac.at (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id MAA11650 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 12:36:55 +0200
Message-ID: <339FD0DC.4043@univie.ac.at>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 12:35:08 +0200
From: Gerald Loeffler <Gerald.Loeffler@univie.ac.at>
Reply-To: Gerald.Loeffler@univie.ac.at
Organization: I.M.P.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Removing Translation and Rotation after MD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Greetings!

I would very much appreciate your comments to the following problem:

I need to remove the translational and rotational motion of a protein
after a Molecular Dynamics simulation.

I know, this is a seemingly trivial problem.

A) Up to now I didn't care much about the details and just fitted all
protein structures along the MD trajectory to the start structure such
that the C-alpha atoms are optimally (i.e., minimal root-mean-square
deviation) superimposed (e.g. using the excellent profit program).

B) However, it may be that for my current problem the other alternative
that came to my mind would be better suited, namely
	1) removing translation by superimposing the centers of gravity
	   of all structures
	and subsequently
	2) removing rotation by superimposing the "principal axes of
	   inertia" of all structures.

Firstly, I'm not sure if the terminology of B)2) is correct.

Secondly, I'm missing the formulas to do B)1) and B)2).

Thridly, I'd like to know if there are cases where either method A) or
method B) are definitely prefered.

Fourthly, it may be that there are other methods of removing translation
and rotation?!

Fifthly, which free program implements method B) or other intersting
methods?

As always, I thank you very much in advance for your help, and I will
summarize to the list if there is some interest in that.

	Cheers,
	gerald
-- 

Gerald Loeffler
PostDoc in Theoretical Biochemistry

EMail: Gerald.Loeffler@univie.ac.at
Phone: +43 1 79730 554
Fax:   +43 1 7987153
SMail: I.M.P. - Research Institute of Molecular Pathology
       Dr. Bohr-Gasse 7
       A-1030 Vienna
       AUSTRIA

From ccl@www.ccl.net  Thu Jun 12 10:48:28 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA21524; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:35:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from theory.tc.cornell.edu  for richard@tc.cornell.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA02080; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:35:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ren.tc.cornell.edu (REN.TC.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.244.22]) by theory.tc.cornell.edu (8.8.4/8.8.3/CTC-1.0) with SMTP id KAA38881 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:35:31 -0400
Sender: richard@TC.Cornell.EDU
Message-ID: <33A00933.5E65@tc.cornell.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:35:31 -0400
From: Richard Gillilan <richard@TC.Cornell.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:more on animation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Since there has been recent interest in animation,
I thought I'd throw in my 2c. 

We do quite a lot of general scientific animation
here at the Cornell Theory Center. Our main tool
is IBM Visualization Data Explorer (DX). I've written
a few molecular graphics modules which create most
of the constructs I need for biomolecular systems. 
Because DX is so general, it's not as easy
to work with as a dedicated application program
like VMD. Generality can be an advantage when you 
need to do unusual things like have a point 
moving on a colored potential energy surface while a
corresponding molecular model changes its conformation.
A video Paul Bash and I are about to finish has a ball-and-stick
model, ribbon, electron density surfaces and a point on P.E. 
curve all moving while a photon excites the works to a 
higher state. DX, AVS and similar packages are good for 
this kind of thing. We use RenderMan to do high-quality
rendering and special effects when needed. Anyone who
already has DX can download these modules (no cost). 


http://www.tc.cornell.edu/Visualization/Staff/richard/CM/CM.html

Art Olson's group at Scripps may also have some tools like this
for AVS

http://www.scripps.edu/pub/olson-web/

Also, I should mention VPLA, the Visual Programming Language for 
Animation. This was written by Wayne Lytle, a former staff member
here and is also available at no cost:

http://www.tc.cornell.edu/Visualization/Software/VPLA/

It is a VERY nice alternative to SoftImage, Alias and other
unaffordable professional animation programs. I use it whenever
I need nice choreography and special effects in a scene: like
swimming bacteria with bumps and moving cilia and flagella or 
fly-though scenes with fancy camera angles and special lighting 
(like underwater).


Richard Gillilan
Cornell Theory Center
http://www.tc.cornell.edu/~richard/

From ccl@www.ccl.net  Thu Jun 12 14:48:29 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA23605; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from po6.andrew.cmu.edu  for hpaik+@andrew.cmu.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA09221; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:46:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from postman@localhost) by po6.andrew.cmu.edu (8.8.2/8.8.2) id OAA04441 for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:46:31 -0400
Received: via switchmail; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:46:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pcs35.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail
          ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/q006/QF.cnc4DSO00iWU01GMU0>;
          Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:45:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pcs35.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail
          ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr7/hpaik/.Outgoing/QF.Ync4DRW00iWU058lA0>;
          Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:45:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mms.4.170.Jun.27.1996.16.34.50.sun4.51.MacMail.5.2.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.pcs35.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4m.54
          via MS.5.6.pcs35.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4_51;
          Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:45:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4nc4DRW00iWU058l40@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:45:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Hyun-Jong Paik <hpaik+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Thermal Radical Initiator


Hi, I need your help.  

I need spcecil thermal initiator for my research.  I don't have exact
sturcture in mind.  I'd like to take a look at the catalogues of
companies which provide special initiator.  Could you recommend the
companies?

Thanks in advance.  

From polymer@rmit.EDU.AU  Thu Jun 12 18:48:30 1997
Received: from rmit.EDU.AU  for polymer@rmit.EDU.AU
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id SAA25116; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 18:34:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bunyip.ph.rmit.edu.au (bunyip.ph.rmit.EDU.AU [131.170.94.250]) by rmit.EDU.AU (8.8.5/8.7.3/voga/ram2) with ESMTP id IAA29797 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 08:33:23 +1000 (EST)
Received: from BUNYIP/SpoolDir by bunyip.ph.rmit.edu.au (Mercury 1.21);
    13 Jun 97 08:34:12 +1000
Received: from SpoolDir by BUNYIP (Mercury 1.21); 13 Jun 97 08:33:46 +1000
From: "Prof. Robert Shanks" <polymer@rmit.EDU.AU>
Organization:  RMIT Applied Physics
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date:          Fri, 13 Jun 1997 8:34:01 EST-10ESUT
Subject:       CCL:Molecular modeling software for non-theorists?
Reply-to: ShanksRA@rmit.EDU.AU
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail/Mac (v2.2.0, wide beta 6)
Message-ID: <14F7D709BE@bunyip.ph.rmit.edu.au>


To:  Julius Su
Molecular modeling software for non-theorists?

We use:
Chem3D (Macintosh)
Hyperchem (MS Windows)
CAChe (Macintosh)
MSI Insight II Polymer (Silicon Graphics)
Unichem (Silicon Graphics interface, Cray computations)

I can reiterate your experience with Chem3D, in fact the Chem Office programs are well 
integrated and offer full scripting and web interaction.
Hyperchem is similar, but a stand alone modelling program. It has more display facility than 
Chem3D in that it can display orbitals. It can also compute vibrational modes. It has similar 
ease of use to Chem3D. 
CAChe has more extensive computations than either of the above and it is property based. 
On the Macintosh it has an automatic spreadsheet type entry system (Project Leader) for 
molecules and properties - once this has been setup the program will automatically move 
through all the properties desired for each molecule and place the values in the cells. It has 
some QSPR type computations in addition to the quantum mechanical and molecular 
mechanics methods.
MSI Insight we use onlt for polymers. It is a research tool which is not in the same category 
as the above programs.
Unichem is a quantum mechanics program. It is only difficult to use in that it requires links 
with a Cray Supercomputer.

Sincerely
Robert Shanks


From:          jsu@ugcs.caltech.edu (Julius Su)
Subject:       CCL:Molecular modeling software for non-theorists?
To:            chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date:          Mon, 9 Jun 1997 21:40:42 -0700 (PDT)


Hello,

  I work for a research group that uses laser spectroscopy to investigate
the basic dynamics of chemical systems on a short time scale.  Some 
members of our group have done fairly high level ab initio and molecular
dynamics simulations in the past; however, the main focus of the group
has definitely been experimental.  

  Because of this, there has been no standard way to model chemical
systems in our group.  Individuals in the group have either written
their own molecular dynamics routines or have had access to facilities
where programs like Gaussian 92 could be run, but no convenient in-group
facility to do simple molecular modeling has existed.          

  We are currently seeking to change this.  We would like to have some
standard way of finding the geometries of small to medium molecules
at a reasonable level of theory (semiemperical would be fine) and
for doing molecular dynamics of photoexcited systems.  This system
would have to be accessible and easy enough to use that any experimentalist
that wished to carry out an experiment would be able to quickly
throw together a rough simulation of the system in question.

  Our group plans to purchase two fairly high end PCs to run the
software that would be needed to do this.  I have recently purchased a
copy of Chem3D Pro with MOPAC for my personal use, and have found the
interface for molecule building and geometry optimization to be
intuitive and easy to use.  We also have some simple code that was
written within the group to do molecular dynamics on small clusters
of rigid molecules.  This code can be easily interfaced with Chem3D.

  Alternatively, we have found information on the Web about HyperChem,
which appears to have the ability to do model building, geometry optimization,
and a feature that would be especially useful to us, reactive molecular
dynamics.  It also appears to have facilities built in to visualize
vibrational modes and molecular oribtals (althought the latter feature
would not be nearly as important.)  Since our group already has a copy
of Gaussian 94, the added ab initio capabilities of the program are
nice but not essential.

  The main concern at this point, however, is how easy HyperChem would be 
to use.  Chem3D has impressed us with its intuitive interface and its
tight integration with ChemDraw.  We have not been able to find a 
demo of version of HyperChem with enabled building facilities to 
compare.  Since 90% of the time will probably be spent doing simple
model building and geometry optimization, this is particularly      
important to us.

  So, has anyone on this list had experience with HyperChem and Chem3D?
How easy is it to build molecules in HyperChem?  Does it have a 
reasonably useable interface?  Can it generate publication quality
graphics?  Can experimentalists who don't want to spend too much
time learning the nitty-gritty of semiemperical theory do simple
calculations using it?

  Thank you very much for your help.

Later,

Julius Su
jsu@cco.caltech.edu 


  


---
Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: 
Coordinator
MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 
73
Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
             Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
---


__________________________________
Prof. Robert A. Shanks
Professor of Polymer Science
Department of Applied Chemistry
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Box 2476V GPO
Melbourne Victoria 3001
Australia
Telephone and Fax +61 3 6602122
Mobile Telephone +61 041 935 8001
WWW RMIT Polymer Science Page:
http://www.rmit.edu.au/departments/cm/polymer/index.html
__________________________________

From churca@opium.q1.fcen.uba.ar  Thu Jun 12 19:48:32 1997
Received: from opium.q1.fcen.uba.ar  for churca@opium.q1.fcen.uba.ar
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id TAA25240; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 19:21:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (churca@localhost) by opium.q1.fcen.uba.ar (8.8.0/8.8.0) with SMTP id UAA12102; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 20:10:30 -0300
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 20:10:30 -0300 (ARST)
From: Ojitos <churca@opium.q1.fcen.uba.ar>
To: Andy Holder <aholder@CCTR.UMKC.EDU>
cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Qsar programs
In-Reply-To: <9706111530.AA40193@134.193.11.2>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970612200818.12000B-100000@opium.q1.fcen.uba.ar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




Hi,
     Thanks everybody for the help about QSAR program. It was really
helpful to get all this information, i will try to make a resume and send
it.

             Thanks, again 
                               Adrian



Adrian Turjanski
churca@q1.fcen.uba.ar



