From Jonathan.Connor@mailhost.mcc.ac.uk  Thu Jun 26 09:48:05 1997
Received: from nessie.mcc.ac.uk  for Jonathan.Connor@mailhost.mcc.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA03450; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 08:59:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199706261259.IAA03450@www.ccl.net>
Received: from mailhost.mcc.ac.uk by mailhost.mcc.ac.uk 
          id <20003-0@mailhost.mcc.ac.uk>; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 13:59:11 +0100
Subject: Ph D studentship
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 13:59:05 +0100 (BST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jonathan Connor <Jonathan.Connor@mailhost.mcc.ac.uk>
Sender: Jonathan.Connor@mailhost.mcc.ac.uk


EPSRC Ph D Project Studentship
(suitable for chemistry, physics or mathematics graduates)


New Theories of Chemical Reactions and Molecular Collisions


This project is concerned with understanding the dynamics of chemical 
reactions and molecular collisions important in atmospheric and 
combustion chemistry.  It involves some collaboration with the USA.
We have had considerable success and recognition in this area.

The project provides interesting and varied training in analytical and 
numerical methods using state-of-the-art computational facilities. There is 
a considerable demand from industry for Ph D graduates with this type of 
research training.

Usual EPSRC eligibility rules apply. For further information contact:

Professor J.N.L. Connor			Tel:  0161-275-4693/4686
Department of Chemistry			Fax:  0161-275-4734
University of Manchester
Manchester M13 9PL 		Email: J.N.L.Connor@Manchester.ac.uk
-- 
******************************************************************************
 Professor J.N.L. Connor,     Phone(direct line): 0161-275-4693 (national)
 Department of Chemistry,                     :+44-161-275-4693 (international)
 University of Manchester,
 Manchester M13 9PL,            Phone(secretary): 0161-275-4686 or 4600
 England.                                    Fax: 0161-275-4734 or 4598  
****************************************************************************** 


From toukie@zui.unizh.ch  Sun Jun 22 10:50:38 1997
Received: from zzmkgtw.zzmk.unizh.ch  for toukie@zui.unizh.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA02712; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 10:38:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by zzmkgtw.zzmk.unizh.ch; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA14220; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:38:31 +0200
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970622144043.0066676c@highdent.zzmk.unizh.ch>
X-Sender: toukie@highdent.zzmk.unizh.ch (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:40:43 +0200
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Subject: MOLZYME?
Cc: toukie@zui.unizh.ch




Dear Colleagues;

        Has anyone ever heard of a programme called (someting like) MOLZYME?
I've heard that this is a modified version of MOPAC which is supposed to be
able to handle macromolecules, but I've been unable to find out anything
about it.

        Thanks in advance to all responders.


Sincerely,

S. Shapiro
toukie@zui.unizh.ch



From toukie@zui.unizh.ch  Sun Jun 22 11:50:43 1997
Received: from zzmkgtw.zzmk.unizh.ch  for toukie@zui.unizh.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA02766; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 10:53:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by zzmkgtw.zzmk.unizh.ch; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA19660; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:53:04 +0200
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970622145515.00663d20@highdent.zzmk.unizh.ch>
X-Sender: toukie@highdent.zzmk.unizh.ch (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:55:15 +0200
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Subject: Hydrogen bonding to acetylenes?
Cc: toukie@zui.unizh.ch





Dear Colleagues;

        If anyone is aware of publications discussing acetylenic protons as
hydrogen bond donors (e.g., R-C#C-H --- O=C< or Ar-C#C-H --- :N#), kindly
share your information with me.  A quick manual search through CA didn't
turn up anything useful, but I might have been searching using the wrong key
words.

        Thanks in advance to all responders.

Sincerely,

S. Shapiro
toukie@zui.unizh.ch



From bradley@mail.enterprise.net  Mon Jun 23 03:50:57 1997
Received: from dns0.enterprise.net  for bradley@mail.enterprise.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA07175; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 03:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from default (ppp296.enterprise.net [194.72.196.42]) by dns0.enterprise.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA13652 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 08:31:24 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199706230731.IAA13652@dns0.enterprise.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <bradley@mail.enterprise.net>
From: "David Bradley Science Writer" <Bradley@enterprise.net>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 08:30:18 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Nanomodels
Reply-to: Bradley@enterprise.net
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.53/R1)




Jan suggested I send this query to the list so here it is

I am writing a feature for the IOP mag "Scientific Computing World" 
and am looking for leads to people and research in the area of 
molecular modelling for nanotechnology. I have come across 
Globus/Merkle and the people who wrote AMOEBA, MASS and NanoCAD but 
need to find other scientists who are using such programs (and 
others) to design components and create virtual nanotech ready for 
whenever these things can be synthesised in reality.

Any pointers, clues or assistance esp. from UK/Europe would be 
greatly appreciated.

Regards

Dave Bradley
 -------------------------------------------------------
|             David  Bradley  Science Writer            |
|                 Bradley@enterprise.net                |
|              Tel/Fax     +44 1223 440834              |
|                                                       |
| Elemental Discoveries: chemical happenings on the web |
|   http://homepages.enterprise.net/bradley/elem1.html  |
|                                                       | 
 -------------------------------------------------------


From pyadav@UMDNJ.EDU  Mon Jun 23 12:53:16 1997
Received: from rwja.UMDNJ.EDU  for pyadav@UMDNJ.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA00426; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199706231617.MAA00426@www.ccl.net>
Received: by rwja.UMDNJ.EDU
	(1.37.109.20/16.2) id AA291632645; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:17:25 -0400
From: Prem Yadav <pyadav@UMDNJ.EDU>
Subject: CC semantics/reply to Bieniasz
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




Dear Dr. L.Bieniasz,

	I am sorry if my definition of mol. modeling and comp. chem. 
mislead you. I never said computational chemistry always lead to a 
molecular model. 
For example, molecular dynamics simulation of a structure, charge 
calculation, molecular orbital calculation etc, I mean simulation of few 
components of a system. When you say a model, that is complete in 
itself associated with the particular system. A model is not always a 
molecular model, it may be model of any system coming from a particular  
discipline: physical, chemical, biological, ocean, aerospace etc. 
Molecular figure (in line, stick, ball and stick or space_fill (CPK) is 
not  a molecular model (as some times people  refer in their 
publications), it is just a figure (it may be in 2D or 3D). A molecular 
model must have its functional characteristics in it.
Computation is not always computational chemistry. It (computation) may 
be the computer simulation of any properties such as weather forecast, 
simulation of jet speed etc where a series of mathematical expressions 
are solved by the means of computational approach or computer 
simulation. Computer and computation is nothing but a tool to solve the 
mathematical expressions and mathematical expressions are the 
transformation of physical principles, chemical properties, biological 
phenomenon etc. When the computer simulation is done 
on a chemical system, it comes in computational chemistry discipline.

Four examples you have given "computer modeling of ..........", I would 
prefer and feel appropriate to write as "simulation of .......". Why to 
say "computer modeling", because it is done by computer or something 
else ?. Please take my comments as a positive view. You may be right.

regards

Prem Yadav
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr.  L.Bieniasz wrote:

I wonder how you would classify the following types of evidently
chemical and computational research:

1) computer modelling of combustion phenomena (hundreds of species and
reactions, highly nonlinear systems of ODEs or PDEs, intractable by
analytical approaches),

2) computer modelling of spatio-temporal nonlinear dynamic effects in
chemical reaction-diffusion systems by cellular automata methods,

3) computer modelling of electrochemical microelectrode assemblies in two
or three-dimensional geometry (complex PDE systems with sophisticated 
boundary conditions, over non-trivial space domains.

4) investigations of the chemical inference rules for automating 
analytical chemistry measurement systems, and their practical
implementation in the form of expert systems.

None of these examples is molecular modelling, but I daresay all of them
are computational chemistry.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prem Yadav, Ph.D.  		IST-Academic Computing Center
				University of Medicine & Dentistry of NJ
Voice: 908-235-4172		Room No. SB-11
Fax:   908-235-5252		675 Hoes Lane
Email: pyadav@umdnj.edu     	Piscataway, NJ 08854-5635
	http://www.umdnj.edu/~pyadav/prem.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


From buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu  Mon Jun 23 12:53:25 1997
Received: from dns1.uga.edu  for buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA00267; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: <buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu>
Received: from ibmnla.chem.uga.edu (ibmnla.chem.uga.edu [128.192.5.8]) by dns1.uga.edu (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id LAA25670; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:45:42 -0400
Received: from localhost by ibmnla.chem.uga.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15097; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:45:28 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:45:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Michael D. Bartberger" <bartberg@chem.ufl.edu>
Cc: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:BSSE in cyclophanes?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970620012459.14091A-100000@mailey>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.95.970623113323.17395A-100000@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




	Usually, BSSE correction will be maeningful for weak 
intermolecular interaction at a relative low theoretical level.  
Personally, I think that the BSSE correction should not be 
considered in the isodesmic reaction in your case. For example,
if the BSSE correction count about 1 kcal/mol, it will be 
insignificat for the error bar at the level you used.
	However, if you still are interested in the BSSE correction
for intramolecular interaction, you may see a recent approach
in S. Reiling, J. of Computational Chemistry, v17, 133, 1996.
for BSSE correction of intramolecular hydrogen bonds.

=================================================================
Dr. Buyong Ma             buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu
Computational Center for Molecular Structure and Design
Department of Chemistry
University of Georgia
Athens, Georgia 30602 USA            Voice (706) 542-2044
=================================================================



On Fri, 20 Jun 1997, Michael D. Bartberger wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Greetings:
> 
> I am currently investigating the thermodynamics of formation for a series
> of substituted para-cyclophanes, of the general type
> 
>                          CH2---Ph---CH2
>                          |           |
>                          |           |
>                          CH2---Ph---CH2
> 
>       
>                                                      /CH=CH\ 
> as formed from their xylylene "monomers":   2   CH2=C       C=CH2
>                                                      \CH=CH/
> (pardon the ASCII artwork!)
> 
> Methodology so far has been as follows: geometry optimizations and
> frequencies/ZPE determination at RHF/3-21G (I'd like to go larger but I
> have other substituted systems where the number of heavy atoms gets quite
> large)  with single-point energies at MP2/6-31G* and B3LYP/6-31G* on the
> RHF/3-21G geometries.
> 
> I've been worrying about BSSE.  As far as I've determined from
> following various threads of discussion on this list, BSSE manifests
> itself when determining energetics of interacting vs. isolated "monomers",
> where a superposition of molecule A's basis functions onto molecule B (and
> vice versa) occurs.  I can see the ramifications of this, in, say, a case
> such as the acetic acid dimer, for instance.
> 
> Where I'm unsure is when the "dimer" is formally bound, such as above.
> Should one account for BSSE effects in such a case?  Surely some
> superposition of basis functions onto adjacent/nearby nuclei occurs (?)-
> if so, then it most certainly does so in just about any other organic
> system (again, ??)   :)  Pardon me, I don't mean to get too
> philosophical.......and I hope the question is not ridiculous.
> 
> The burning question is the following: where does one draw the line when
> deciding to incorporate BSSE effects?  Intuitively, I'd imagine one does
> not include them in a case like this, a formally it (the dimer) is
> a single molecule........  otherwise, BSSE would become a factor in, for
> example, [4+2] or other cycloadditions, or for that matter, any other
> reaction where bonds are being formed.
> 
> Am I thinking too hard about this????   :)  Sorry, it's late.....
> 
> I'll certainly summarize responses-  I'd greatly appreciate any insight 
> the community might be able to lend.
> 
> Thanks very much!
> 
> Best Regards,
> -Michael
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> 
>  Michael D. Bartberger         bartberg@chem.ufl.edu        TEL: (352) 392-3580
>  Department of Chemistry       bartberg@qtp.ufl.edu         FAX: (352) 846-0296
>  University of Florida
>  Gainesville, FL  32611
>  USA
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Administrivia: This message is automatically appended by the mail exploder:
> CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
> MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
> Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
>              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
> ---
> 
> 



From buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu  Mon Jun 23 12:53:31 1997
Received: from dns1.uga.edu  for buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA00367; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:08:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: <buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu>
Received: from ibmnla.chem.uga.edu (ibmnla.chem.uga.edu [128.192.5.8]) by dns1.uga.edu (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id MAA14594 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:08:39 -0400
Received: from localhost by ibmnla.chem.uga.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17964; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:08:26 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:08:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: CC semantics
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.95.970623120547.18981B-100000@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




Dear Dr. Bieniasz:
        If I am right, you have post a question a few monthes ago
asking whether the computational modeling of electrochemical
microelectrod system could be classified as computational chemistry.
I certainly agree with you. I admit that molecular modeling is a
term a little too narrowly defined. Your questiones give arise
another question: IS COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY DEFINED NOT BROAD ENOUGH?
We all know that computational chemistry is a young discipline and
still keep growing. However, it seems that it is a general problem
in scientific practice classification. Today's science is multi-
discippline and overlap significantly. In early this centry people
argured if physical chemistry should have its own definition or
it is a subbranch of physics. The boundary is not clearly cut today.
For example, many scientists doing computational chemistry say that  they
are PHYSICAL CHEMISTS rather than COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTS.
        There are other problems in scientific practice classification:
how to dissect our world? is it reductable to elemental physics? Let us
look biological world for example. There are biologists, biochemists,
molecular biologists, molecular biochemists, and CHEMISTS. (One
interesting thing is that so many papers in J. AM. CHEM. SOC. are
biochemistry related.) I do not know whether biology be reducable
to molecular biology. For our chemist, the question is whether
the behaviour of a cup of water be describable by the properties
of H2O molecule or its clusters(both intra- and intermolecular
properties). If you are positive, molecular modeling could be
acceptable. Even though the best decription could be made without
rigour involvement of water molecules, do you think that molecular
modeling could do it? Professor Clementi's global simulation effort
seems to be in this direction.


=================================================================
Dr. Buyong Ma             buyong@ibmnla.chem.uga.edu
Computational Center for Molecular Structure and Design
Department of Chemistry
University of Georgia
Athens, Georgia 30602 USA            Voice (706) 542-2044
=================================================================

On Fri, 20 Jun 1997, Lestaw K. Bieniasz wrote:

>
>
>                               Tuebingen, 20.06.97
>
> Dear Drs. Buyong Ma and Prem Yadav,
>
> I wonder how you would classify the following types of evidently
> chemical and computational research:
>
> 1) computer modelling of combustion phenomena (hundreds of species and
> reactions, highly nonlinear systems of ODEs or PDEs, intractable by
> analytical approaches),
>
> 2) computer modelling of spatio-temporal nonlinear dynamic effects in
> chemical reaction-diffusion systems by cellular automata methods,
>
> 3) computer modelling of electrochemical microelectrode assemblies in
two
> or three-dimensional geometry (complex PDE systems with sophisticated
> boundary conditions, over non-trivial space domains.
>
> 4) investigations of the chemical inference rules for automating
> analytical chemistry measurement systems, and their practical
> implementation in the form of expert systems.
>
> None of these examples is molecular modelling, but I daresay all of them
> are computational chemistry.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>                                       L.Bieniasz
>
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------*
> |                        Dr. Leslaw Bieniasz                        |
> | temporary address: (3rd April 1997 - 31st August 1997)            |
> |       Institut fuer Organische Chemie, Universitaet Tuebingen     |
> |          Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.       |
> |              E-mail: lestaw.k.bieniasz@uni-tuebingen.de           |
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------*
> | permanent address:                                                |
> | Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Polish Academy of Sciences,|
> | Molten Salts Laboratory, ul. Zagrody 13, 30-318 Cracow, Poland.   |
> |                   E-mail:  nbbienia@cyf-kr.edu.pl                 |
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------*
>






From " huixiao"@helix.nih.gov  Mon Jun 23 16:45:00 1997
Received: from helix.nih.gov  for " huixiao"@helix.nih.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id QAA02073; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:05:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hongh ([128.231.219.15])
	by helix.nih.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA16797
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:05:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <2C28D094.25D3@helix.nih.gov>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1993 15:52:20 -0600
From: huixiao hong <" huixiao"@helix.nih.gov>
Organization: NIH
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Problem in GRASP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




I am using GRASP 1.2 to investigate the potential surface, especifally
the interface between protein and ligand. The ligand (ibuprofen) is
beried deeply into the protein (COX1). So I can not just display the
residues around the active site by scribing. Could you recommend me or
teach me how to do it. Thanks

Huixiao Hong

E-mail: huixiao@helix.nih.gov


From vkitzing@sunny.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de  Tue Jun 24 08:54:41 1997
Received: from otto.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de  for vkitzing@sunny.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA07042; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 07:45:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sunny.mpimf-Heidelberg.mpg.de by otto.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA15953; Tue, 24 Jun 97 13:45:44 +0200
Received: from [149.217.50.47] (mac20) by sunny.mpimf-Heidelberg.mpg.de (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA08304; Tue, 24 Jun 97 13:42:25 +0200
X-Sender: vkitzing@sunny.MPImF-Heidelberg.mpg.de (Unverified)
Message-Id: <v01540b02afd562a89bd4@[149.217.50.47]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 12:42:05 +0100
To: Shubin Liu <shubin@email.unc.edu>, chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: vkitzing@sunny.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Eberhard von Kitzing)
Subject: Re: CCL:Global minimization




Dear Shubin Liu,

At 15:41 Uhr 20.06.1997, Shubin Liu wrote:
>As geometrical optimization only gives a local minimal, I hope to find a
>way, if possible, to achieve the global minimal for a molecule. At least,
>I hope that some way to check if the optimized structure is a local or
>global minimal is available somewhere. Any comments are welcome. Thanx.

Try a look at:

H. A. Scheraga (1996). "Recent developments in the theory of
protein-folding - searching for the global energy minimum." Biophysical
Chemistry 59(3) 329-339.

A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, C. G. E. Boender and G. Th. Timmer (1985). A
Stochasitc Approach to Global Optimization. Computational Mathematical
Programming. Berlin, Springer. 282-308.

R. Abagyan and M. Totrov (1994). "Biased probability monte-carlo
conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and
proteins." Journal of Molecular Biology 235(3) 983-1002.

Hans Bremermann (1970). "A Method of Unconstrained Global Optimization."
Mathematical Biosciences 9 1-15.

Eberhard von Kitzing (1992). Modeling DNA Structures: Molecular Mechanics
and Molecular Dynamics. Methods in Enzymology. San Diego, Academic Press.
449-466.

======================================================================

Eberhard von Kitzing

Max-Planck-Institut fuer Medizinische Forschung
Jahnstr. 29
D 69115 Heidelberg
Germanny

email: vkitzing@sunny.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de
WWW: http://sunny.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/people/vkitzing/Eberhard.html




From yubofan@guomai.sh.cn  Tue Jun 24 10:45:11 1997
Received: from gm-email.guomai.sh.cn  for yubofan@guomai.sh.cn
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA08708; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 10:12:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ------ ([210.0.0.14])
	by gm-email.guomai.sh.cn (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA14778
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 23:09:06 +0800
Message-Id: <199706241509.XAA14778@gm-email.guomai.sh.cn>
From: "·ΆΣύ²¨" <yubofan@guomai.sh.cn>
To: <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Want a program ot visualize electronic density contour.
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 22:06:53 +0800
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




Hi, ccl'er,


I do some calculations on my PC by G94W. I want ot visualize the electric
density contour. Which program can this job? A small one is preferred.



Thanks 

Y. FAN




From toukie@zui.unizh.ch  Tue Jun 24 10:45:15 1997
Received: from zzmkgtw.zzmk.unizh.ch  for toukie@zui.unizh.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA08593; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 10:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by zzmkgtw.zzmk.unizh.ch; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA05512; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:59:04 +0200
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970624140118.00668464@highdent.zzmk.unizh.ch>
X-Sender: toukie@highdent.zzmk.unizh.ch (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 16:01:18 +0200
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Subject: van der Waals radii for amino acids
Cc: toukie@zui.unizh.ch




Dear Colleagues;

        For a calculation I wish to perform, I require the van der Waals
radii of each of the atoms (including hydrogen) in the 20 common amino
acids.  If anyone can recommend a published source of this information (or
if anyone should happen to have this information as an e-mailable file),
I would appreciate hearing from you.

        Thanks in advance to all responders.

Sincerely,

S. Shapiro
toukie@zui.unizh.ch



From yubofan@guomai.sh.cn  Tue Jun 24 10:45:20 1997
Received: from gm-email.guomai.sh.cn  for yubofan@guomai.sh.cn
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA08711; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 10:12:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ------ ([210.0.0.14])
	by gm-email.guomai.sh.cn (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA14782
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 23:09:14 +0800
Message-Id: <199706241509.XAA14782@gm-email.guomai.sh.cn>
From: "·ΆΣύ²¨" <yubofan@guomai.sh.cn>
To: <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Why does G94W's SCF option make errors?
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 22:08:30 +0800
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Hi, ccl'ers,


I calculated a molecule with 3 Phenyls. I use BLYP/3-21G**. This time, I
try "restart", a SCF option that I didn't use before. I kill the job after
L502.exe had been running 4 cycles, then I put "restart" after "SCF=". I
ran the calculation again. L502.exe did 2 cycles and the result was gotten.
Again I did the job from the very original start. After 6 cycles had been
done, another result was gotten. I list them below:

:With SCF=(save, restart)
Convergence on energy, delta-E=1.12D-05
 SCF Done:  E(RB-LYP) =  -692.644057005     A.U. after    2 cycles
             Convg  =    0.2054D-03             -V/T =  2.0090
             S**2   =   0.0000
 KE= 6.864357999909D+02 PE=-3.864671343753D+03 EE= 1.355127785196D+03

:With SCF=save
SCF Done:  E(RB-LYP) =  -692.644408415     A.U. after    6 cycles
             Convg  =    0.4070D-05             -V/T =  2.0094
             S**2   =   0.0000
 KE= 6.861718246427D+02 PE=-3.864945652472D+03 EE= 1.355665717853D+03


Why do they have error I think it considerable great?


Thanks a lot

Y. FAN





From support@mathtrek.com  Wed Jun 25 08:45:20 1997
Received: from granite.sentex.net  for support@mathtrek.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA14803; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 08:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from p7a.silicon.sentex.ca (p7a.silicon.sentex.ca [207.245.212.40]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA17078; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 08:16:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.16.19970625080648.2a67a91a@sentex.net>
X-Sender: mathtrek@sentex.net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (16)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 08:06:50 -0400
To: YONG HUANG <Y0H8797@ACS.TAMU.EDU>, CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
From: "William R. Smith" <support@mathtrek.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:Definition of "thermochemical"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"




Hello,

        I can't cite chapter and verse, but "thermochemical" generally
deals with the thermodynamics/kinetics/... of REACTING systems - typically
any properties of such systems depending on temperature (- "thermo") and
reactions (- "chemical").  "Thermodynamic" refers to ALL aspects of
thermodynamics (including thermochemical) - i.e. the study of changes in a
system when internal energy is the prime factor - (and temperature is the
most significant variable affecting a system state).  "Thermodynamics" thus
applies to BOTH reacting and nonreacting systems.

        "Thermophysical" is another term used, which generally refers to
the effects of temperature on NON-REACTING systems - this includes, for
example, phase equilibria.  

        Modifications/sharpening of the above welcomed!


At 09:22 PM 6/24/97 -0500, YONG HUANG wrote:
>Can anybody explain what is "thermochemical"? What is the difference of it
>from
>"thermodynamic"? Anywhere I can find official definitions? What is
>thermochemical kinetics as in Prof. S. Benson's book "Thermochemical
Kinetics:
>Methods for the Estimation of Thermochemical Data and Rate Parameters"?


-- W. R. Smith, PhD, P. Eng., Senior Scientist, Mathtrek Systems --
3-304 Stone Road West, Suite 165, Guelph, Ontario CANADA N1G 4W4
EMail: support@mathtrek.com       Tel:519-763-1356,FAX:519-763-4525
--------------------- http://www.mathtrek.com ---------------------
-Mathtrek Systems - Home of EQS4WIN Chemical Equilibrium Software -



From gadre@unipune.ernet.in  Wed Jun 25 12:45:22 1997
Received: from sangam.ncst.ernet.in  for gadre@unipune.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA16089; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 12:18:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from iucaa (iucaa.ernet.in [144.16.31.4]) by sangam.ncst.ernet.in (8.7.5) with SMTP id SAA26647 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:35:58 +0530 (GMT+05:30)
Received: from unipune.ernet.in by iucaa (5.65v3.2/SMI-4.1)
	id AA29722; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:25:41 +0500
Received: by unipune.ernet.in (8.8.5/UNIPUNE-MAILHUB(02.04.97))
	id SAA26653; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:24:50 -0500 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:24:50 -0500 (GMT)
From: gadre@unipune.ernet.in (Prof.Gadre Faculty-Chemistry)
Message-Id: <199706252324.SAA26653@unipune.ernet.in>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Deadline : Registration : XII ICCCRE




 Deadline :  Registration Fees for ICCCRE 

Dear Sirs : The last date of payment of Registration Fees for the
conference (US$150 for students and $300 for others) is July 31, 1997.
The payment may be made by a Banker's draft drawn on the State Bank of India
(DG, Pune) payable to "The Registrar, University of Pune(ICCCRE)".
The draft should be mailed to Professor S. R. Gadre
                              Department of Chemistry
                              University of Pune
                              Pune-411007. INDIA.
Thanks and looking forward to meet you in Pune in January 1998!
Shridhar Gadre, Convenor, XII ICCCRE.



From chemtw@showme.missouri.edu  Wed Jun 25 17:47:56 1997
Received: from mail.missouri.edu  for chemtw@showme.missouri.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id RAA00461; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 17:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from black.missouri.edu (black.missouri.edu [128.206.2.222])
	by mail.missouri.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA131766
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:09:56 -0500
Received: from localhost (chemtw@localhost)
	by black.missouri.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA47426
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:08:58 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: black.missouri.edu: chemtw owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:08:58 -0500 (CDT)
From: Troy Wymore <chemtw@showme.missouri.edu>
X-Sender: chemtw@black.missouri.edu
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: CHARMM/SGI problem
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.95q.970625160140.99044B-100000@black.missouri.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII





Dear CCl'ers

I am not sure if this is a CHARMM problem or a Silicon Graphics system
problem.  I have a hexadecimal file that I am tryinig to unformat on the
SGI (either a Power Challenge or an Indigo).  the hexadecimal file comes
>from a Cray T3D.  After the command:

dynamics unformat input_unit 1 output_unit 2

I get the following on the screen (not in output file):

sue: unformatted io not allowed
apparent state: unit 2 named mic_subpn2_dyn5c.trj
last format:
lately reading sequential unformatted external IO
*** Execution Terminated (103) ***

Does anyone know what is wrong, either with CHARMM script or with
operating system?

****************************************
Troy Wymore
Department of Chemistry
University of Missouri-Columbia
Columbia, MO 65211

e-mail: chemtw@showme.missouri.edu
http://www.missouri.edu/~chemtw/troy.html
*****************************************



From bear@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu  Thu Jun 26 17:48:12 1997
Received: from ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu  for bear@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id RAA06908; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:22:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from bear@localhost)
	by ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA15368
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:22:49 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:22:49 -0700 (MST)
From: Soaring Bear <bear@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu>
Message-Id: <199706262122.OAA15368@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: FEP binding energy


Greetings:


I have noticed that published studies of FEP energy calculations
of inhibitor binding are largely on a pairwise basis, comparing
small numbers of inhibitors (presumably due to computational cost).
I am interested in locating studies which have compared at least
a dozen.   I would appreciate any references.      Also, any
examples with structure based affinity calculation (especially
linear response approximation)?

thankyou for any help,
Bear


[7m[5mSOARING BEAR[0m   bear@pharmacy.arizona.edu        O-topoisomerase
Computational Medicinal Chemistry            5'*:        :*.*
Cancer Biochemistry & Drug Design              |'*.    .*'| |
Protein & DNA Structural Biology               | | *.,* | | |
Pharmacognosy & Natural Dentistry            3'*.DNA helix| *
http://ellington.pharm.arizona.edu/~bear         '***'  '**'

From bear@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu  Thu Jun 26 18:48:11 1997
Received: from ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu  for bear@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id RAA06899; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from bear@localhost)
	by ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA15363;
	Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:22:04 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:22:04 -0700 (MST)
From: Soaring Bear <bear@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu>
Message-Id: <199706262122.OAA15363@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net, mail@ellington.Pharmacy.arizona.edu
Subject: FEP binding energy


Greetings:


I have noticed that published studies of FEP energy calculations
of inhibitor binding are largely on a pairwise basis, comparing
small numbers of inhibitors (presumably due to computational cost).
I am interested in locating studies which have compared at least
a dozen.   I would appreciate any references.      Also, any
examples with structure based affinity calculation (especially
linear response approximation)?

thankyou for any help,
Bear


[7m[5mSOARING BEAR[0m   bear@pharmacy.arizona.edu        O-topoisomerase
Computational Medicinal Chemistry            5'*:        :*.*
Cancer Biochemistry & Drug Design              |'*.    .*'| |
Protein & DNA Structural Biology               | | *.,* | | |
Pharmacognosy & Natural Dentistry            3'*.DNA helix| *
http://ellington.pharm.arizona.edu/~bear         '***'  '**'

From brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu  Thu Jun 26 19:48:12 1997
Received: from cheetah.it.wsu.edu  for brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id TAA07396; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 19:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bert.chem.wsu.edu (bert.chem.wsu.edu [134.121.43.22])
	by cheetah.it.wsu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA29960;
	Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bert.chem.wsu.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA21990; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:13:48 -0700
From: brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu (Brian W. Beck)
Message-Id: <9706262313.AA21990@bert.chem.wsu.edu>
Subject: Software:Equation Editor for MSWD(Mac)
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net (Computational Chemistry List)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: chemweb@ic.ac.uk (ChemWeb)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



	Can anyone give me names (or testimonials if you have them)
	of equation editors that can be used with MicrosoftWord for Macs?
	
	I know MSWD come with an eqn. editor, but since it's object based,
	it's difficult to globally manipulate equations (change all V's to
	U's, or double the size of all integral symbols).

	I'm looking for something that functionally behaves like Endnote
	does for references. Perhaps an equation file that is searchable
	and manipulatable that can later be "re-plugged" back in to Word.

	The various species of TEX and ROFF were great at this because they
	were essentially a markup language.

	Typing and correcting permutations of my potential functions over
	and over is getting to be a drag.

	-Brian

-- 
=============================================================================
|   .---------.| Brian W. Beck      |    E-mail Addresses:                  |
|/\ |         || Biochem/Biophysics |        brian@bert.chem.wsu.edu        |
|| \\     WSU || Washington St. Univ|   brian_beck@wsu.edu                  |
|\  -        *|| 639 Fulmer         |  URL  http://elmo.chem.wsu.edu/~brian |
| |           || Pullman, WA, USA   |    VOICE    (509) 335-4083            |
| \___________||       99164-4660   |      FAX    (509) 335-9688            |
=============================================================================

