From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Dec 12 11:23:19 1998
Received: from www.ccl.net (www.ccl.net [192.148.249.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA08178
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 11:23:18 -0500
Received: from nic.upatras.gr (nic.upatras.gr [150.140.1.30])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id LAA15457
        Sat, 12 Dec 1998 11:17:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 11989 invoked from network); 12 Dec 1998 16:16:53 -0000
Received: from pythagoras.physics.upatras.gr (150.140.159.71)
  by nic.upatras.gr with SMTP; 12 Dec 1998 16:16:53 -0000
Received: from [150.140.159.92] by pythagoras.physics.upatras.gr with SMTP
	(1.36.108.4/16.2) id AA01985; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 19:15:13 +0200
Message-Id: <36729814.F617C3E@physics.upatras.gr>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 18:21:40 +0200
From: chris <garoufal@physics.upatras.gr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: two el. integrals
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear CClers
when using in gaussian94  the extralink l316 along with the NoRaff and
Symm=NoInt
we get in the log file the two electron integrals.
Firstly, I am not sure about the notation of these integrals. Is the
physicist notation or the chemist notation (according A.Szabo).
Second, I asume that these integrals are over AO's. Is there a way to
make g94 print the inegrals over MO 's ?  (without having to employ
post-scf methods)

thanks in advance





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Dec 12 11:25:40 1998
Received: from www.ccl.net (www.ccl.net [192.148.249.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA08223
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 11:25:40 -0500
Received: from nic.upatras.gr (nic.upatras.gr [150.140.1.30])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id LAA15468
        Sat, 12 Dec 1998 11:19:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 12042 invoked from network); 12 Dec 1998 16:19:14 -0000
Received: from pythagoras.physics.upatras.gr (150.140.159.71)
  by nic.upatras.gr with SMTP; 12 Dec 1998 16:19:14 -0000
Received: from [150.140.159.92] by pythagoras.physics.upatras.gr with SMTP
	(1.36.108.4/16.2) id AA01992; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 19:17:35 +0200
Message-Id: <367298A2.FC59B9E3@physics.upatras.gr>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 18:24:02 +0200
From: chris <garoufal@physics.upatras.gr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: two el. integrals
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear CClers
when using in gaussian94  the extralink l316 along with the NoRaff and
Symm=NoInt
we get in the log file the two electron integrals.
Firstly, I am not sure about the notation of these integrals. Is the
physicist notation or the chemist notation (according A.Szabo).
Second, I asume that these integrals are over AO's. Is there a way to
make g94 print the inegrals over MO 's ?  (without having to employ
post-scf methods)

thanks in advance





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Dec 12 12:32:17 1998
Received: from www.ccl.net (www.ccl.net [192.148.249.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA08271
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 12:32:17 -0500
Received: from mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA (mattacf@mcmail.CIS.McMaster.CA [130.113.20.6])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id MAA15741
        Sat, 12 Dec 1998 12:26:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (mattacf@localhost)
	by mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA10809
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 12:26:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 12:26:05 -0500 (EST)
From: "C.F. Matta" <mattacf@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: G94 under Linux
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.981212115422.7494A-100000@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi everybody,

I am running Gaussian94 and Atoms-In-Molecules (AIM) jobs on a PC and they
all seem to run too slow (both in real time and in CPU time)for the
hardware specs. Where is the bottleneck, and what hardware part(s) can be
changed to speed the calculations? I will summarize.  Thank you in advance.

Cherif Matta
Graduate student, McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4M1

SPECIFICATIONS:
===============
Operating system:		Red Hat Linux 5.1
Processor:			single Intel Pentium II MMX - 300MHz
Mother board:			AX6BC
External bus clock:		66MHz
Cache:				512K
RAM:				320M ( 2x128M + 64M) 10-nanoseconds DIMMs
Swap space:			237M (in two partitions, 117M and 120M)
Hard drive:			6.4G  IDE (Quantum)


