From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Mon Feb  1 18:46:57 1999
Received: from teapot28.domain6.bigpond.com (teapot28.domain6.bigpond.com [139.134.5.197])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id SAA04899
        Mon, 1 Feb 1999 18:46:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by teapot28.domain6.bigpond.com (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id oa884144 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 09:40:30 +1000
Received: from BDIP-T-009-p-236-35.tmns.net.au ([139.134.236.35]) by mail6.bigpond.com (Claudes-Ultra-Violet-MailRouter V2.2a); 02 Feb 1999 09:40:24
Message-ID: <000f01be4e3c$cd535f30$09007a81@hnlsyd8>
Reply-To: "Dr Huang" <showing@bigfoot.com>
To: <Undisclosed.Recipients@www.ccl.net>
From: "Dr Huang" <showing@bigfoot.com>
Subject: Polarography Software available in CCL archives
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 10:44:22 +1100



  Polar 3.2 for Windows: Electrochemical simulation and data analysis

  W.S. Ping Company
124 Eastern Avenue, Kingsford, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia
Phone: 61 2 96620516, 0413 008 019
mailto:polarography@bigfoot.com, showing@bigfoot.com
http://www.bigfoot.com/~polarography/
http://www.bigfoot.com/~showing/
ftp://www.ccl.net/pub/chemistry/software/MS-WIN95-NT/Polarograms

 It analytically and digitally simulates voltammograms (polarograms)
on about 20 mechanisms at 8 electrode geometries (planar, spherical, semi-
spherical, cylindrical, semi-cylindrical, microdisc, thin film, and rotating
electrodes) in over 5 techniques (linear sweep and CV, DC, normal pulse,
differential pulse, and square wave voltammetries), and outputs current,
resitance, conductivity and surface concentration. It also simulates effects
of charge current, resistance, noise, electrolyte, stripping time, stripping
potential, etc.

 It analyses any x-y data for detecting peak location, peak value,
semi-derivative, derivative, intergral, semi-intergral, curve fitting,
and separating overlapped peaks.

 It shows a tip when the user put mouse cursor over a lable. It can
separate overlapped voltammograms into individuals, and extract real peaks
from voltammogram with noise and baseline. Users can compare by the
theoretical peak values, analytically and digitally simulation, and choose
to extract which kinetic pararmeters. Its data can be imported into other
program (e.g. MS Excel).

 It has been successfully applied to fit experimental
polarograms (voltammograms) of In(III), Cd(II), Pb(II), Tl(I), Cr(III).
Zn(II), and binuclear copper complex in aqueous and non-aqueous media
at mercury, solid metal and non-metal electrodes (specifically the
dropping mercury, hanging mercury drop, gold, platinum and glassy
carbon electrodes) by various electrochemical techniques (differential
pulse, sqware wave, and pseudo-derivative normal pulse polargraphies) [1].

 Its 32-bit version Polar32 runs on IBM PC under Windows 3.11/95/98/NT
while its 16-bit version Polar32b runs under Windows 3/3.1/3.11/95/98/NT.
They are available from the author or download from my Web site.

 REFERENCES
[1] W. Huang, T. Henderson, A.M. Bond and K.B. Oldham, Curve fitting
    to resolve overlapping voltammetric peaks: model and examples,
    Anal. Chim. Acta, 1995, 304, 1-15.




From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Feb  2 03:31:32 1999
Received: from ns.dsm.nl (ns.dsm.nl [163.175.153.2])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id DAA06890
        Tue, 2 Feb 1999 03:31:31 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven.Creve@dsm-group.com
Received: from dsm-fw1. (dsm-fw1.dsm.nl [163.175.153.254])
          by ns.dsm.nl (8.8.6/MQT) with SMTP id JAA07282
          for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 09:37:50 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (root@localhost)
	by dsm-om1.dsm.nl (8.8.6/MQT) with SMTP id DAA05695
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net;Tue, 2 Feb 1999 03:29:40 -0500 ("EST)
X-OpenMail-Hops: 5
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 09:31:24 +0100
X-OpenMail-Transport-Id: <0312336B6B7DC044/NL/400net/DSM/36B6B6C2.10DD.1586.000>
Message-Id: <"36B6B6C2.10DD.1586.000*Creve_Steven_SJR//RESEARCH/NL/400net/DSM"@MHS>
Subject: CCL:CoMFA software
MIME-Version: 1.0
TO: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net



Hi All,

can anybody point me to some CoMFA software packages (both commercial and
academic).

Thank you

Steven Creve



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Feb  2 05:39:36 1999
Received: from hermes.bmc.uu.se (hermes.bmc.uu.se [130.238.39.159])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id FAA07326
        Tue, 2 Feb 1999 05:39:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alpha2.bmc.uu.se ([130.238.37.65]) by hermes.bmc.uu.se
          (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-17733) with SMTP id AAA19489
          for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>;
          Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:35:10 +0100
Received: from localhost by alpha2.bmc.uu.se; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/30Jan97-1111AM)
	id AA13684; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:39:34 +0100
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:39:34 +0100 (MET)
From: John Marelius <john@alpha2.bmc.uu.se>
Reply-To: John Marelius <john@alpha2.bmc.uu.se>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: Alpha based computers in computational chemistry
In-Reply-To: <85256708.004BD21D.00@bdc-notes003.na.pg.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.3.95.990202090316.11173A-100000@alpha2.bmc.uu.se>



On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 shelley.jc@pg.com wrote:

> 
> Hello,
>     In the context of individual research laboratories looking for
> workstations or low to mid-range compute servers, are alpha based computers
> used much in computational chemistry laboratories and if so how?  

In the group I work in we use Alpha workstations with WindowsNT for
computational chemistry, mostly running our own molecular dynamics
software. The Alpha + WindowsNT combination has proven to be a powerful
combination of a high-performance number-cruncher and a desktop computer
for word processing (MS Office etc) in one box.
We find systems based on the Alpha processor not only to be the fastest
but also to give the highest performance/price ratio. Systems based on the
new generation of Alpha chips ("21264") are starting to become available,
promising another large jump in performance.

WindowsNT still has some drawbacks as a compute server operating system.
* A third-party batch queue package is needed.
* It's not a (simultaneous) multi-user system although remote login by
telnet is possible (although sometimes problematic) by means of additional
software.

John Marelius

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|          John Marelius                                          |
|          Dept. of Molecular Biology, Uppsala University         |
| E-mail:  john@alpha2.bmc.uu.se                                  |
| address: Box 590, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden                      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+




From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Feb  2 08:35:11 1999
Received: from chris2.u-strasbg.fr (maerker@chris2.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.34.140])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id IAA08205
        Tue, 2 Feb 1999 08:35:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from maerker@localhost)
	by chris2.u-strasbg.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA11165;
	Tue, 2 Feb 1999 14:35:46 +0100
From: Christoph Maerker <maerker@chris2.u-strasbg.fr>
Message-Id: <199902021335.OAA11165@chris2.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: problem with G94 volume runs
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net (ccl)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 14:35:46 +0100 (MET)
Cc: maerker@chris2.u-strasbg.fr (Christoph Maerker)
Organization: Laboratoire de Chimie biophysique, Institut Le Bel,



Universite Louis Pasteur
Postal-Address: 4, rue Blaise Pascal, F- 67000 Strasbourg FRANCE
Phone: +33/3-88-41-53-19
Fax:   +33/3-88-60-63-83
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL37 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 650       

Dear CClers,

I wanted to do some G94 runs with the Volume keyword. In some cases I got
zero volumes computed:

Box volume =13970.821 fraction occupied=0.000 
Molar volume =    0.000 bohr**3/mol (  0.000 cm**3/mol)
Recommended a0 for SCRF calculation =  0.50 angstrom (  0.94 bohr)

In other instances, however, I got non-zero volumes of the correct size; 
but from the few cases I have I cannot see any regular pattern. It seems
to me that the molecule of interest is not positioned in the box at all
(zero occupation fraction ?!).

Has anybody ever hit this problem ? What is the cause, and how to solve the
problem ?

Sincerely yours,
C. Maerker



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Feb  2 13:29:35 1999
Received: from sumter.awod.com (sumter.awod.com [198.81.225.1])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id NAA14431
        Tue, 2 Feb 1999 13:29:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [208.140.97.215] (wa0215.tnt2.awod.com [208.140.97.215])
	by sumter.awod.com (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA08082;
	Tue, 2 Feb 1999 13:29:23 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from netsci@awod.com)
X-Sender: arichon@awod.com
Message-Id: <v01530500b2dc9f9639d5@[208.140.98.138]>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 13:30:39 +0100
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: netsci@awod.com (Network Science)
Subject: The 1999 Charleston Conference



A few spaces are available for The 1999 Charleston Conference.  If you plan
to attend, please check http://www.netsci.org for registration details.




From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  3 03:42:59 1999
Received: from frederik.pml.tno.nl (frederik.pml.tno.nl [134.221.122.10])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id DAA19557
        Wed, 3 Feb 1999 03:42:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: by frederik.pml.tno.nl; id JAA29336; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:42:44 +0100
Received: from postoffice.pml.tno.nl(134.203.134.74) by frederik.pml.tno.nl via smap (4.1)
	id xma029226; Wed, 3 Feb 99 09:42:14 +0100
Received: by postoffice.pml.tno.nl with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
	id <1F751DVT>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:41:31 +0100
Message-ID: <97C27A97BB05D211B37100805FE2A63814A3D8@postoffice.pml.tno.nl>
From: "Gurp, Ron van" <gurp@pml.tno.nl>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Cc: "Zelst, Michel van" <zelst@pml.tno.nl>
Subject: Drawing Lewis structures
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:41:29 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Content-Type: text/plain


Dear netters,

We are looking for software (Linux/Windows95/98 or NT) that can draw Lewis
structures of organic molecules, depicting all electron lone  pairs as well
as bonding pairs. Is there any computer program  available that generates
such structures semi-automatically? 

I appreciate all your answers and I will summarize.

Kind Regards, 

Ron A. Rumley- Van Gurp, M.Sc. 
TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory
Chemical Toxicology
E-mail: gurp@pml.tno.nl


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  3 05:16:12 1999
Received: from uldns2.unil.ch (uldns2.unil.ch [130.223.4.5])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id FAA20135
        Wed, 3 Feb 1999 05:16:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pcbch3207h.unil.ch ([130.223.143.63] ident=aborel)
	by uldns2.unil.ch with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net
	id 107zLj-0000l0-00; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:15:59 +0100
Message-ID: <XFMail.990203121558.Alain.Borel@icma.unil.ch>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on Linux
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 12:15:58 +0100 (MET)
Organization: Universiy of Lausanne
Sender: aborel@pcbch3207h.unil.ch
From: Alain Borel <Alain.Borel@icma.unil.ch>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: CCL:G: gaussian98 for Linux using g77


Dear sirs,

did anybody try and build gaussian98 using g77 on Linux? I do not
have the option of using the officially supported Portland
compiler.
I managed to compile the util library but linking fails with 2
undefined symbols (wait_ and fork_).
In case this plays a role I am using g77 shipping with egcs
release 1.1.1.

Thank you in advance

Alain Borel
Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
University of Lausanne (Switzerland)

----------------------------------
E-Mail: Alain Borel <Alain.Borel@icma.unil.ch>
Date: 03-Feb-99
Time: 12:10:14


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  3 10:29:01 1999
Received: from natick-emh2.army.mil (NATICK-EMH2.ARMY.MIL [153.103.2.15])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id KAA22505
        Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:29:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: by natick-emh2.army.mil with VINES-ISMTP; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:28:44 EST
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:38:59 EST
Message-ID: <vines.sWl8+od4iqA@natick-emh2.army.mil>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
To: <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
From: "Michael Sennett" <msennett@natick-emh2.army.mil>
Reply-To: <msennett@natick-emh2.army.mil>
Errors-to: <msennett@natick-emh2.army.mil>
Subject: CALL FOR PAPERS
X-Incognito-SN: 461
X-Incognito-Version: 4.25.293
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


						American Chemical Society
			Division of Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering

								Call for Papers

			Adhesion: Chemistry, Process and Mechanics

							New Orleans, Louisiana
								August 1999

 The American Chemical Society Division of Polymeric Materials: Science and
Engineering is sponsoring a symposium on chemistry, mechanics, and process
engineering aspects of adhesion, adhesive bonding, paint adhesion, and related
subjects. The symposium will be held in conjunction with the National meeting
of the American Chemical Society in New Orleans, Louisiana, August 22-26, 1999.

 
Original research papers are solicited in the following areas: 

Fundamentals of Surface and Interface Chemistry 

Modeling and Simulation of Interfaces and Adhesion

Surface Chemistry, Cure Chemistry and Adhesion

Process Effects on Chemistry and Adhesion

Surface Chemistry and Mechanics of Durability

Mechanics and Fracture Mechanics of Adhesion

Two copies of 150-word abstract (original on ACS abstract form) and three
copies of PMSE preprint (original on PMSE preprint paper) are due to the
symposium chairs by APRIL 1, 1999. Detailed instructions for authors can be
obtained from the Symposium Chairs or from the PMSE website at:
http://www.umd.umich.edu/~rpotts/acs/; the website can also accessed from the
ACS website, http://www.acs.org.

Symposium Chairs

 Dr. Ray A. Dickie
Ford Research Laboratory
P. O. Box 2053, MD3083SRL
Dearborn, MI 48121-2053, USA

(313)337-4059
(313)621-0646 (fax)
rdickie1@ford.com


Prof. A. J. Kinloch
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Imperial College
Exhibition Road
London SW7 2BX, UK

0171 594 7082
0171 823 8845 (fax)
a.kinloch@ic.ac.uk
 


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  3 10:41:23 1999
Received: from hera.wku.edu (hera.wku.edu [161.6.20.1])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id KAA22639
        Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:41:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from adler@localhost)
	by hera.wku.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id JAA05098;
	Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:41:18 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:41:18 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199902031541.JAA05098@hera.wku.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: hera.wku.edu: adler set sender to adler@hera.wku.edu using -f
From: Allen Adler <adler@hera.wku.edu>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net, adler@hera.wku.edu
Subject: Re: Drawing Lewis structures



Disclaimer: I am a mathematician, not a chemist.

Ron A. Rumley- Van Gurp writes:

>We are looking for software (Linux/Windows95/98 or NT) that can draw Lewis
>structures of organic molecules, depicting all electron lone  pairs as well
>as bonding pairs. Is there any computer program  available that generates
>such structures semi-automatically? 

I asked about this several years ago. At the time, people referred
me to ChemTeX, which draws chemical formulas, but it doesn't seem
to handle Lewis structures. In Latex, one could probably use the
resident graphics capabilities to write macros or enhance the ones
that come with ChemTeX. If I were to do it, I would probably write
some programs directly in PostScript, but that is a matter of taste
and endurance.

Does "semi-automatically" imply that the program will figure out the
Lewis structure as well as draw it? The problem with that, in
my perception, is that, at least as it is described in textbooks,
the procedures for determining Lewis structures are not consistent.
There is an exception in the case of books which dumb down the rules
to apply only to a small class of examples (the "This is a course on
how to pass this course" approach), but let's not even mention that.

People have been complaining about this all the way back to Lewis, who
never intended that his innovation should be used to prop up the same
kind of arbitrary rule-based pedagogy about bonding that he himself had
to go through and which he had hoped to dispel by inventing Lewis structures.
I have a list somewhere, guaranteed not to be complete, which I compiled
when I was thinking of writing an article about how screwed up pedagogy
seems to be on this point. I abandoned the project when I realized that
people have long complained about this in print and it has had no effect
whatsoever on pedagogical practice.

Apart from such inconsistencies, different authors try to do different
things with Lewis structures. For example, Wheland's book on resonance
has much fancier versions of Lewis structures with different kinds of
electrons, and if I remember correctly he refers to other literature
that I was unable to obtain that takes it even further. At any rate,
there seem to be a lot of versions of "Lewis structures" in the literature.

Allan Adler
adler@hera.wku.edu

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  3 15:00:04 1999
Received: from adams.moldyn.com (gateway.photon.com [206.71.176.98])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id PAA03481
        Wed, 3 Feb 1999 15:00:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: by adams.moldyn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
	id <YHVRY9CN>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 14:50:50 -0500
Message-ID: <22E7F3D5131DD2119E3700A0C9D18F6D0706B9@adams.moldyn.com>
From: Hon M Chun <hon@moldyn.com>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Request for comment: interest in various comp chem capabilities
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 14:50:48 -0500 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
Content-Type: text/plain


Dear netters,

	I'd like to get some feedback on the level of interest in the
following topics. The purpose of this request is to gather information that
will allow Moldyn to determine what features to incorporate into potential
future products.

*	Free energy from MD calculations
How practical are these calculations perceived to be, compared to the
alternatives? Is the accuracy mostly limited by the forcefield parameter
set, or by the length of the simulation trajectory?

*	High throughput molecular dynamics
High throughput screening and docking of molecules are commonplace. How
about high throughput molecular dynamics of the docked compounds (ligand and
protein)? How important is it to analyze dynamic motions of the docked
ligand/receptor complexes?

*	Coarse-grained dynamics modeling of large macromolecules, such as
viral capsids
How much interest is there for a coarse-grained modeling approach for the
dynamics of large macromolecules that can be completed in a reasonably short
amount of time? By coarse-grained, I mean grouping together atoms at the
sub-residue level, residue level, or beyond.  We therefore sacrifice many
atomic details for greater speed and access to larger scale properties.
Interaction forces are calculated at corresponding levels, and not at the
atomistic level, resulting in significantly higher computational speed
(approximately 2 orders of magnitude faster) than atomistic models. Such a
dynamics model will not include explicit solvent, but will implicitly
include solvent in the parameter set or via some form of continuum model. I
recognize that there are many groups that are developing this class of
simulation methods. I'd like to hear from potential users of such methods,
to gauge the level of commercial and academic interest.

*	Dynamics of Self-assembly
How much interest is there in studying the assembly or aggregation process?
Would you use it for nanotechnology or molecular biology?



Thank you in advance for your comments.

Hon Chun
hon@moldyn.com


Hon M. Chun, Ph.D.
Vice President & Chief Technical Officer
Moldyn, Inc., 955 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-3180
Phone:(617)354-3124 Voicemail: X16, Fax:(617)491-4522



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  3 20:08:12 1999
Received: from theory.tc.cornell.edu (THEORY.TC.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.30.174])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id UAA07651
        Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:08:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ren.tc.cornell.edu (REN.TC.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.244.22]) by theory.tc.cornell.edu (8.8.4/8.8.3/CTC-1.0) with SMTP id UAA26511 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:08:13 -0500
Sender: richard@tc.cornell.edu
Message-ID: <36B8F2FB.41C6@tc.cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 20:08:11 -0500
From: Richard Gillilan <richard@tc.cornell.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.2 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: uniform random orientations
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Does anyone have a pointer to methods of obtaining
uniformly randomly distributed orientations of
a rigid body?

Richard Gillilan
Cornell Theory Center

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  3 20:18:01 1999
Received: from chu.Chem.nthu.edu.tw (Chu.Chem.nthu.edu.tw [140.114.45.233])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id UAA07806
        Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:17:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by chu.Chem.nthu.edu.tw (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA12635; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 08:54:11 +0800
From: lin@chu.Chem.nthu.edu.tw (Chiu-Ling Lin)
Message-Id: <9902040054.AA12635@chu.Chem.nthu.edu.tw>
Subject: 6-31G* basis set of Sn in Gaussian Type?
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 08:54:10 +0800 (TAIST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-Type: text


Dear Netters,
     Does anyone have the 6-31G* basis set of the element 
Sn in Gaussian type?

Any hits will be appreciated !

Regards,
Chiu-Ling Lin


****************************************
e-mail: lin@chu.chem.nthu.edu.tw
NTHU, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, R. O. C.
****************************************

