From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sun Oct 17 11:47:34 1999
Received: from sunu450.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (sunu450.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.222.33])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA10669
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 11:47:33 -0400
From: Christoph.van.Wuellen@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Received: (qmail 27232 invoked from network); 17 Oct 1999 15:41:06 -0000
Received: from sgi249.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (134.147.64.2)
  by mailhost.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 17 Oct 1999 15:41:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 12214 invoked by uid 10283); 17 Oct 1999 15:40:46 -0000
Message-ID: <19991017154046.12213.qmail@sgi249.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Subject: DFT and dispersion forces
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 17:40:45 +0200 (MSZ)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just to get the discussion on formal grounds again:

imagine two argon atoms at both sides of a "wall" (i.e., an infinite potential
barrier). Since both densities do not overlap, the DFT exchange-correlation
hole at a reference point at one side of the barrier cannot distinguish if
at the other side there are MOVING electrons or a static charge distribution.
Hence, while induction forces etc. are present in the DFT calculation, all
dispersion interactions are necessarily absent (yes there is dispersion
force between the two atoms).

You will find the example esoteric, but two argon atoms at a distance where
their densities practically do not overlap are just the same.

Who can come up with a functional that gives dispersion in these cases:
it is not impossible but necessarily non-local: if the reference point is on
one side, the density at the other side must be taken into account as well.
A gradient expansion ist not sufficient because of the convergence radius!

---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Christoph van Wullen       | Fon (University):  +49 234 32 26485
Theoretical Chemistry      | Fax (University):  +49 234 32 14109
Ruhr-Universitaet          | Fon/Fax (private): +49 234 33 22 75 
D-44780 Bochum, Germany    | eMail: Christoph.van.Wuellen@Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sun Oct 17 17:21:21 1999
Received: from mail.AlAkhawayn.ma (alakhawayn.ma [193.194.63.82])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA11770
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 17:21:15 -0400
Received: from location (fwinternet.alakhawayn.ma [193.194.63.129])
	by mail.AlAkhawayn.ma (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id VAA16132
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 21:17:39 GMT
Message-Id: <199910172117.VAA16132@mail.AlAkhawayn.ma>
X-Sender: J.Conceicao@mail
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.2 
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 21:05:21 +0000
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Jose Conceicao <J.Conceicao@alakhawayn.ma>
Subject: Computational Chemistry in Education
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi everyone

Does anyone have any information/statistics on :

1. The number of universities/colleges currently using some form of
computational modelling program in chemical education.

2. The number of universities/ colleges that teaches computational
chemistry as part of their curriculum.

Thanks in advance.

Jo

Dr. Jose J.B. Conceicao
Assistant Professor
Al Akhawayn University in Ifrane (AUI)
School of Science & Engineering (SSE)
B.P. 1904 Avenue Hassan II
MOROCCO
53 000
Tel #: (212) 586-2143
Email:J.Conceicao@alakhawayn.ma
http://www.alakhawayn.ma/~J.Conceicao/#top

We the unwilling
Led by the unqualified
Have been doing the unbelievable so long with so little
That we now attempt the impossible with nothing
						- Anonymous- 
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sun Oct 17 12:31:57 1999
Received: from rzusuntk.unizh.ch (rzumail2.unizh.ch [130.60.128.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA10871
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 12:31:57 -0400
Received: [from rzusgi.unizh.ch (chburger@rzusgif.unizh.ch [130.60.68.19])
           by rzusuntk.unizh.ch (8.8.5/SMI-5.31) with ESMTP id SAA29504;
           Sun, 17 Oct 1999 18:25:30 +0200 (MET DST)]
From: "Dr. Peter Burger" <chburger@aci.unizh.ch>
Received: [(chburger@localhost)
           by rzusgi.unizh.ch (8.8.8/SMI-IRIX6.2/USAR_MAIL_V2) id SAA29722;
           Sun, 17 Oct 1999 18:25:30 +0200 (MDT)]
Message-Id: <199910171625.SAA29722@rzusgi.unizh.ch>
Subject: CCL: Re Beowulf/Chemistry/Athlon
To: mthompson@seanet.com (Mark A. Thompson)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 18:25:30 +0200 (MDT)
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <008001bf18b7$c8f47910$01808080@biggeek> from "Mark A. Thompson" at Oct 17, 99 08:53:40 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
Content-Type: text

Mark,

for some info on how it's done check:

http://www.cs.utk.edu/~rwhaley/ATL/INDEX.HTM

Source & prebuilt libs are at:

http://www.netlib.org/atlas/

!!! Alot of thanks go to Clint Whaley (the author) !!!!

For the Athlon, you have to build one yourself or I can
send you mine.

Atlas just generates fast Blas-level 3 libs - you still need
level 1 and 2 blas lib from other places.

The Atlas generated dgemm on my PIII-550 runs at ca.
430 Mflops, which is way ahead (ca. 100 MFlop) of G. Henry's 
PentiumPro lib for Linux. 

On the Athlon-500 one can squeeze out approximately 540-550 
MFlops. Assuming linear scaling, one can build for a reasonable
amount of money (the 700 MHz Athlon is still too expensive)
a 700 Mflop machine with the 650 MHZ version and still has the potential
of > 1 GFlop once a dgemm routine is available that makes use of both
FP (add, mul) pipelines.

Peter
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 Peter Burger
 Universitaet Zuerich
 chburger@aci.unizh.ch
