From chemistry-request {*at*} ccl.net Tue Mar 5 22:18:39 1991 Date: Tue, 05 Mar 91 20:43:52 CST From: Jan Jensen Subject: Concepts vs. Accuracy?? To: chemistry -x- at -x- ccl.net Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computer Network Status: R In response to David Bernhold's thoughts, a quote from Levine's 'classical' QUANTUM CHEMISTRY: Approximation of the helium ground-state wave function as a product of hydrogenlike 1s orbitals with effective nuclear charge zeta [...] provides a simple physical picture that is in accord with the usual chemical concepts; however, this function does not give a very accurate value for the energy. When we use a function like [...] with a hundred or so terms, we get an extremely accurate wave function and energy, but we lose the simple physical interpretation. This is a general occurrence in quantum chemistry; "the more accurate the calculations become the more the concepts tend to vanish into thin air."[6] [6] R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys., 43, s2 (1965). Levin, pg. 209 Jan Jensen (NU145752 -A_T- NDSUVM1.EDU) Dept. of Chemistry North Dakota State University Fargo, ND 58105 ---