From chemistry-request %-% at %-% server.ccl.net Thu Oct 18 13:19:53 2001 Received: from physics.lsu.edu ([130.39.182.96]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f9IHJrB30227 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:19:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (vani(+ at +)localhost) by physics.lsu.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA23135 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:17:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:17:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Vemparala Satyavani To: chemistry%!at!%ccl.net Subject: TIP$P water model (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hi, Thanks for all the help regarding my previous query. I incorporated the TIP4P model. I have one question regarding the constraints in this model of water. To avoid the dynamics on the dummy particle ( as suggested in the GROMACS site, thanks to David Va der Spoel and Paul van Maaren), iam redistribuiting the forces on the dummy to the other three atoms. To do this every time step, i compute the positions of the dummy particle before passing all the coordinates to Ewald method. For the constraints part, i still have constraints only on OH, OH and HH bond. Do i need constraints between dummy particle(M) and other three atoms? If i don't want to use the rigid model, can i use a flexible model for TIP4P water? Can anyone give me some information about where i can get the parameters for the flexible model of TIP4P model of water(AMBER has parameters for TIP3P, i coudn't find parameters for TIP4P.) Thanks vani