From chemistry-request %-% at %-% ccl.net Thu Jun 10 13:34:29 2004 Received: from smtp.ucla.edu (smtp.ucla.edu [169.232.47.136]) by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5AIYSUc021392 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:34:28 -0500 Received: from mail.ucla.edu (mail.ucla.edu [169.232.47.135]) by smtp.ucla.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5AIcTiY015673; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:38:29 -0700 Received: from [128.97.82.155] (Yynode01.seas.ucla.edu [128.97.82.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ucla.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5AIcTFM003441; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:38:29 -0700 Message-ID: <40C8AABF.6060305-.at.-ucla.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:38:55 -0700 From: Douglas Sievers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040519) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Noguera Julian CC: chemistry-.at.-ccl.net Subject: Re: CCL:Experiences with 64 bits AMD processors References: <3EE610AC.3030300-.at.-klingon.uab.es> In-Reply-To: <3EE610AC.3030300-.at.-klingon.uab.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Probable-Spam: no X-Spam-Hits: 0 X-Scanned-By: vscan.smtp.ucla.edu X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on servernd.ccl.net Marc, I'll point you to an earlier message about this, which was a summary of my similar question. http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/message.cgi?2004+04+28+013 You should also note that there is a new Gaussian 03 Revision C1, which includes Opteron support. For more info see the Gaussian website at www.gaussian.com I have run a test job or two on my Athlon64 3400+ machine, using Intel/AMD 32-bit G'03 binaries with no problems. Doug Sievers Marc Noguera Julian wrote: > Hello, > we are interested in buying some more computational resources. In our > group we are interested in 64 bit AMD processors, but we do not know > about their compatibility. They are supposed, as AMD says, to be32 > bit compatible and therefore AMD 64 bit processor should be able to > run any 32 bit application. Is that true? Any experience about this > will help us a lot. > By the way, we are running mainly gaussian jobs, and have some other > 32 bit binaries like turbomole and jaguar. We have source code license > for gaussian 03. Has anyone tried to compile Gaussian 03 for a AMD 64 > bit machine? Do 32 bit pentium binaries run correctly on a 64 bit > processor? which is the increase on the performance? Do Turbomole and > Jaguar binaries run on 64 bit AMD processors? anyone tried? > Any information will be helpful. > Thanks a lot > Marc > > --------------------------- > Marc Noguera Julian > Thcnic Especialista de Suport a la Recerca > Qummica Fisica, Universitat Autrnoma de Barcelona. > Tlf: 00-34-935812173 > Fax: 00-34-935812920 > e-mail: marc-.at.-klingon.uab.es > --------------------------------------- > > > -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =- > To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your > Subject: line > and send your message to: CHEMISTRY-.at.-ccl.net > > Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: > CHEMISTRY-REQUEST-.at.-ccl.net HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: > http://www.ccl.net/jobs > If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer: > Jan Labanowski, jlabanow-.at.-nd.edu (read about it on CCL Home Page) > -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > >