From chemistry-request&$at$&ccl.net Mon Nov 22 10:26:26 2004
Received: from mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.96.75])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAMFQPXu002214
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:26:26 -0500
Received: from max0q2aifg2apps ([131.104.156.125])
	by mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAMFeUqA009010
	for <chemistry=at=ccl.net>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:40:39 -0500
Message-Id: <200411221540.iAMFeUqA009010=at=mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca>
From: "Peng Liu" <pliu=at=uoguelph.ca>
To: <chemistry=at=ccl.net>
Subject: CASSCF Calculation
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:40:30 -0500
Organization: University of Guelph
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Thread-Index: AcTQqZiiWu9dvAkhSP2iZ9j4pHa8Mg==
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=7.5 tests=NO_RDNS2 autolearn=no 
	version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Hi, all:

  I am trying to do the UHF-NO-CASSCF calculation using Gaussian 98 on an
excited aromatic structure. But I've got very different results of the
energy in different computers using the same input file. 
  I tried the same version of G98 (Rev. A.11) on two alpha computers and
didn't get the same result either. I think the only difference may be the
compiler and the version of ATLAS library during the installation, but how
can that make so much difference? 
  I've compared the output files. The differences first occur during the
output of the natural orbitals in the UHF calculation. 

  I really appreciate any help.

Best regards,

Peng Liu