From owner-chemistry _-at-_)ccl.net Mon Oct 3 14:17:00 2005 From: "Mariusz Sterzel msterzel(a)buffalo.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: What keeps a molecule adsorbed? Message-Id: <-29478-051003141526-25902-oFUubBI8b8HYIDholY4Ciw#server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Mariusz Sterzel Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:15:18 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Mariusz Sterzel [msterzel^_^buffalo.edu] Dear Noel, Following Ruedenberg, the simple answer is electrons kinetic energy. For more details look at K. Ruedenberg, Reviews of Modern Physics, 34(2):326-376, (1962) and M.S. Gordon, J.H.Jensen, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 103:248-251, (2000) Mariusz -- Mariusz Sterzel Email: msterzel/^at^\buffalo.edu On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Noel O Boyle noel.oboyle2|*|mail.dcu.ie wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Noel O'Boyle" [noel.oboyle2++mail.dcu.ie] > Dear all, > > I have been trying to explain the results of a DFT study (using G03) > where a molecule adsorbs onto a gold cluster through its nitrogen atom. > > I created an isosurface of the change in the electron density associated > with the adsorption (by calculating the electron densities of the > molecule and the gold cluster separately at the geometry of the adsorbed > system). This shows that electron density *decreases* in the area > between the adsorbate and the surface. This is the opposite of what I > expected. > > A paper by Bilic, Reimers, Hush and Hafner (JCP, 2002, 116, 8981) shows > the same effect for ammonia on an infinite surface of gold(111). It > shows the same result, and says that this is evidence that covalent > bonding effects are not so important (they also have other evidence). > > It seems that I do not understand bonding very well - what keeps the > molecule stuck to the surface, if it isn't a shared electron or two? > > Regards, > Noel > -- > Dr. Noel M. O'Boyle, > Group of Dr. John Mitchell (http://www-mitchell.ch.cam.ac.uk), > Unilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics, > Dept. of Chemistry, > University of Cambridge, > U.K.> > > > >