From owner-chemistry.,at,.ccl.net Wed Jun 20 14:08:01 2007 From: "Gustavo Seabra gustavo.seabra^_^gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Fixing distance between point charge and atoms Message-Id: <-34529-070620115902-24961-qA9v7MuNM4xnCzcTXoRekQ[a]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Gustavo Seabra" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:03:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Gustavo Seabra" [gustavo.seabra:-:gmail.com] You can try adding an additional electron-repulsive term to the point charge, as described in the Gaussian webpage: http://gaussian.com/g_ur/k_charge.htm HTH, Gustav Seabra. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry%%ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry%%ccl.net] > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:39 AM > To: Seabra,Gustavo > Subject: CCL:G: Fixing distance between point charge and atoms > > > Sent to CCL by: "Chunyi Sung" [juneyi1(~)yahoo.com.tw] Hi, CCLers > > I am trying to optimize some molecules in the presence > of point charges using the keyword "charge" in Gaussian; > however, in my case, some O atom in the molecule always ended > up colliding with a positive point charge during geometry > optimization. Therefore, I want to somehow set up some > constraints on that O atom so that it will stay, say, 2.7 > Angstrom away > > from the positive point charge, does anyone know how to do that ? > > Originally, I wanted to put a ghost atom right at the > location of the positive point charge, and then use > "modredundant" to fix the bond length between the O atom and > the ghost atom. However, with the "charge" keyword to include > point charges, "Opt" must have "Z-matrix", which does not > work with "modredundant". So I am now running out of ideas. > I'll appreaciate if anybody has any suggestions on this. > > thanks > > chunyi