From owner-chemistry*- at -*ccl.net Sun Jan 16 06:18:00 2011 From: "Jun Zhang coolrainbow:-:yahoo.cn" To: CCL Subject: CCL: CL: koopmans' theorem Message-Id: <-43655-110116061634-32205-qb1yJAWj7Rhgb94hGf3L3w++server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Jun Zhang Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-738748691-1295176576=:97253" Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:16:16 +0800 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Jun Zhang [coolrainbow]-[yahoo.cn] --0-738748691-1295176576=:97253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello: In my opinion, Koopmans' theorem is based on frozen orbital approximation, = therefore it is uneccessary to relax the nuclei configuration. If you inten= d to get a adiabatic ionization, however, delta SCF is more sutible. Cheers! Jun Zhang =0ANankai University =0Acoolrainbow,+,yahoo.cn =A0Shirin Seifert shirin.seifert|-|gmail.com =A0CCL: koopmans' theorem =A0"Zhang, Jun " Hi, On using the koopmans' theorem to estimate the first and second ionization = energy of a cation, should the geometry of the molecule be that of the cati= on (but neutral)? or the considered geometry is from the optimized neutral = molecule? =0A Thanks for your explanation in advance. Regards, S.S =0A=0A=0A=0A --0-738748691-1295176576=:97253 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello:

In my opinion, Koopmans' theore= m is based on frozen orbital approximation, therefore it is uneccessary to = relax the nuclei configuration. If you intend to get a adiabatic ionization= , however, delta SCF is more sutible.


Cheers!

Jun Zhang=0ANankai University
=0Acoolrainbow,+,yahoo.cn


 Shirin Seifert shirin.seifert|-|gmail.com <owner-chemi= stry,+,ccl.net>
 CCL: koopmans' theorem
 "Zhang, Jun -id#3= zy-" <coolrainbow,+,yahoo.cn>


Hi,
On using the koopmans' theorem to estimate the first and second ioniz= ation energy of a cation, should the geometry of the molecule be that of th= e cation (but neutral)? or the considered geometry is from the optimized ne= utral molecule?
=0A
Thanks for your explanation in advance.

Re= gards,
S.S
=0A

=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A=0A   --0-738748691-1295176576=:97253--