From owner-chemistry ":at:" ccl.net Thu Mar 29 16:21:01 2012 From: "Sebastian Kozuch kozuchs,,yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: calcualtion of kinetic isotopic effect values Message-Id: <-46595-120329131744-10398-v7BNGxGL3Ap5YFxaW15iGQ/a\server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Sebastian Kozuch Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="630850330-1120368410-1333041429=:4455" Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:17:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Sebastian Kozuch [kozuchs(0)yahoo.com] --630850330-1120368410-1333041429=:4455 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Although the X-D and X-H bond distances are very slightly different, I don'= t know any program that can calculate that difference. The optimizations ar= e done in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and the mass of the nuclei are= not taken into account, only their charge. As far as I know (and as far as= all QM software know) deuterium and protium have the same charge, so no re= optimization is necessary. Anyway, the error of the theoretical method is w= ay bigger than the difference in the real bond lengths.=0A=0AMaybe this is = a good opportunity to recommend an essay by Simmons and Hartwig that just a= ppeared in ACIE regarding the analysis of the KIE for inter and intramolecu= lar competition, an issue that has been overlooked an has been the root of = more than one error:=0A Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2012, 51, 3= 066=E2=80=933072.=0ABest,=0ASebastian.=0A=0A=0A=0A_________________________= _______=0A From: Jaccob Madhavan chemjaccob(~)yahoo.co.in =0ATo: "Kozuch, Sebastian " =0ASent: Th= ursday, March 29, 2012 5:26 PM=0ASubject: CCL: calcualtion of kinetic isoto= pic effect values=0A =0A=0ASent to CCL by: "Jaccob=C2=A0 Madhavan" [chemjac= cob _ yahoo.co.in]=0ADear Friends,=0A=0AGreetings! For the calculation of k= inetic isotopic effect(KIE) values, optimization with deutrium is needed or= only frequency calcualtion is enough. Any help in this regard will be high= ily appreciated.=0A=0Awith best regards=0AJaccob=0A=0A=0A=0A-=3D This is au= tomatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=0ATo recover t= he email address of the author of the message, please change=0Athe strange = characters on the top line to the ~ sign. You can also=0Alook up the X-Orig= inal-From: line in the mail header.=0A=0AE-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY ~ c= cl.net or use:=0A=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_c= cl_message=0A=0A= =0A=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=0A= =0A=0A=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.ccl.net/chemis= try/sub_unsub.shtml=0A=0ABefore posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl= .net=0A=0A=0AConferences: http://server.ccl.ne= t/chemistry/announcements/conferences/=0A=0ASearch Messages: http://www.ccl= .net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml=0A=0AIf your mail bounces from CCL wit= h 5.7.1 error, check:=0A=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.ccl.net/spammers.tx= t=0A=0A--630850330-1120368410-1333041429=:4455 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Although the <= span>X-D and X-H bond distances are very slightly different, I= don't know any program that can calculate that difference. The optimizatio= ns are done in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and the mass of the nucle= i are not taken into account, only their charge. As far as I know (and as f= ar as all QM software know) deuterium and protium have the same charge, so = no reoptimization is necessary. Anyway, the error of the theoretical method= is way bigger than the difference in the real bond lengths.

Maybe this is a good opportunity to re= commend an essay by Simmons and Hartwig that just appeared in ACIE regardin= g the analysis of the KIE for inter and intramolecular competition, an issu= e that has been overlooked an has been the root of more than one error:
Angewandte Chemie International Edition<= /i> 2012, 51, 3066=E2=80=933072.
=0A
=0A =0A
Best,
Sebastian.


From: Jaccob Madhavan chemjaccob(~)yahoo.co.in <own= er-chemistry ~ ccl.net>
To: "Kozuch, Sebastian " <kozuchs ~ yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:2= 6 PM
Subject: CCL: cal= cualtion of kinetic isotopic effect values

=0A
Se= nt to CCL by: "Jaccob  Madhavan" [chemjaccob _ yahoo.co.in]
Dear Fr= iends,

Greetings! For the calculation of kinetic isotopic effect(KIE= ) values, optimization with deutrium is needed or only frequency calcualtio= n is enough. Any help in this regard will be highily appreciated.

wi= th best regards
Jaccob



-=3D This is automatically added t= o each message by the mailing script =3D-
To recover the email address o= f the author of the message, please change
the strange characters on the= top line to the ~ sign. You can also
look up the X-Original-From: line = in the mail header.

E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY ~ ccl.net or u= se:
     =

E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST ~ ccl.net or= use
      http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_mes= sage
      http://www.= ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at= : http://www.ccl.net
Conferences: h= ttp://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/

Search Mes= sages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml

If your ma= il bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error, check:
      http:/= /www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutcc= l/instructions/




--630850330-1120368410-1333041429=:4455--