From steve@carbo.cc.binghamton.edu  Wed Nov 30 18:16:12 1994
Received: from carbo.cc.binghamton.edu  for steve@carbo.cc.binghamton.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id RAA05985; Wed, 30 Nov 1994 17:18:46 -0500
Received: by carbo.cc.binghamton.edu (931110.SGI/931108.SGI.ANONFTP)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA17657; Wed, 30 Nov 94 16:59:40 -0500
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 16:49:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Schafer <steve@carbo.cc.binghamton.edu>
Subject: Q:GAMESS MOs
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-Id: <Pine.3.85.9411301659.A17633-0100000@carbo.cc.binghamton.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




	I have been doing some geometry optimizations on transistion metal 
carbonyl complexes.  When the MOs are printed out, the energies do not 
always increase with each MO.  This is the case however for my other work 
on di-Methyl-ether.  One of these systems is Mn(CO)5 using ROHF and C4v 
symmetry.  Are these valid MOs that are just not outputted in order, or 
is there another problem?

	Thanks in advance,

	Steven Schafer
	S.U.N.Y. Binghamton Chemistry Department