From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Thu Jul 20 12:26:18 1995
Received: from BIOMED.MED.YALE.EDU  for RABLEN%KBWGPX@BIOMED.MED.YALE.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id MAA04413; Thu, 20 Jul 1995 12:13:28 -0400
From: <RABLEN%KBWGPX@BIOMED.MED.YALE.EDU>
Received: from DECNET-MAIL (RABLEN@KBWGPX)
 by BIOMED.MED.YALE.EDU (PMDF V4.3-7 #6235)
 id <01HT3CGTNH9C008UX6@BIOMED.MED.YALE.EDU>; Thu, 20 Jul 1995 12:12:44 EDT
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 1995 12:12:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: CCL: Benchmarks for Gaussian 92 or Gaussian 94
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HT3CGTPW2A008UX6@BIOMED.MED.YALE.EDU>
X-VMS-To: BIOMED::IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hi,
     Does anyone have reliable benchmark figures comparing the performance
of different workstations running typical, fairly large Gaussian 92 or
Gaussian 94 jobs?  I am interested in comparing the SGI Power Indigo2
(R8000/75 MHz) and the DEC AlphaStation 600 5/266 in particular.  Please
respond to paul@k9.chem.yale.edu if you have such information.  Many
thanks!
                                                         -- Paul Rablen

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Paul R. Rablen                                   paul@k9.chem.yale.edu
Department of Chemistry
Yale University
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++