Summary for NMR isotropy and anitrosopy



 Dear netters,
 In the meanwhile, as for the concept of anitrosopy and isotropy, thank
 you
 for sending me many replies. I WILL study these concepts and theory.
  Thank you very much for your help.
   Sincerely yours,
   Seiji Mori
 ---my original questions about isotropy and anisotropy---
   Dear Sirs,
  I posted to CCL about the methods of NMR calculation a fey days ago ,
 and had an other question.
 In G94, I tried to calculate the chemical shifts , there are magnetic
 shieldings
 in the output, however, no chemical shift but isotropic  and anitrosopy.
 I examine meaning of these terms in the user's manual of Gaussian 94
 and  several original papers,for example,
 M. Schindler, et al. JCP, 1982, 76, 1919
 and Pulay et al. JACS, 1990, 112, 8251, and so on which there is
 replies of my previous questions
 , but I only know that isotropic terms is "likely" to be
 corresponding to the chemical shifts which was experimentally
 observed.
 I had had experiments in organic chemistry, and I am now carrying out
  the
 ab initio calculations but I amn't much familiar to know the theory
 of NMR spectroscopy.
 Would you please tell me the physical meaning of isotropic  and
 anitrosopy,
 and which is an equivalent of the experimental chemical shift? It is
 better that  you show the references.
     Sincerely yours,
     Seiji Mori
 ---- replies----
 ---1---
 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:10:24 +0100 (MEZ)
 From: Alexander Christian Backes <alexander.backes[ AT ]uni-tuebingen.de>
 Konichiwa Mori-san, (S. Mori wrote: In correct in Japanese,
 Kon-nichiwa.^^:))
 the chemical shift is always a tensor (a symmetric 3 x 3 matrix).
 So, this
 tensor describes the interchange between several NMR-active nuclei.
  The
 outerdiagonal elements are only important in spectra of the solid phase
 because there the position of the molecules and therefore the observed
 nuclei
 are defined and the shift is therefor anisotropic (CSA = Chemnical shift
 anisotropy). In solution the motion of the molecules is randomized,
  so the
 NMR-spectrometer observes the middled shift. This means, the trace
  of the
 matrix is relevant (the trace is the sum of the diagonal elemnts of the
 matrix, divided by three, in case of the 3 x 3 matrix). So, in G94 the
 calculated isotropic shift is the relevant one for solution.
 Of course you need a standard for the chemical shift; G94 doesn't know to
 which reference substance the shifts are related to. So you have to
 calculate
 TMS at exactly the same level as the calculated molecule, and then
  you have
 to subtract the isotropic data of your molecule from the isotropic data of
 TMS. (This you have to do each time you use another method and
 basis set for
 geometry optimization and NMR-calculations).  But be careful -
 the input
 geometry of TMS must have Td-symmetry. And therefore you have to
 precalculate
 TMS at MP2-level to make sure it gets Td-Symmetry. This geometry
 you can use
 as standard input for any of the following calculations of geometry and
 NMR-parameters.
 References to the first point you can find in any book dealing with
 the theory of NMR-spectroscopy.
 The second point has references first our own experience and second
 papers which will be published soon.
 Greetings from Germany,
 Alexander.
 ---2---
 From: lohrenz[ AT ]oci.unizh.ch
 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 13:41:54 +0100 (MET)
 Hi Seiji,
 your are probably interested in the isotropic shielding. To convert
 from shielding to chemical shift (in delta scale) you have to
 calculate the shielding of a reference compound, say for example
 TMS for 1H-, 13C- or Si NMR and substract the calculated shielding
 values of your compound. In principle it is also possible to use
 smaller references like CH4. In this case you have to take care
 of the delta-value of this compound (eg. -2.3 ppm for 13C in CH4).
 Just make sure that you use identical basissets for the calculations.
 The anisotropic values can sometimes be measured in CPMAS
  (solid state
 nmr). They give the shielding along the princible axis of your system.
 For spherical homogeneous compounds like CH4 you will notice that
 the
 anisotropic shieldings are the same as the isotropic. Since solution
 nmr gives an average of all possible orientations you alway get the
 isotropic shieldings. Only in cases where the molecule can be
 oriented (no rotation) like in the solid state, it is possible to
 measure the three anisotropic values independently.
 John
 ---3---
 Date: 28 Nov 1995 14:31:34 +0000
 From: "E.A.Moore (Elaine Moore)" <E.A.Moore[ AT ]open.ac.uk>
 G94 and all other ab initio programs used for calculating chemical shifts
  calulate chemical shielding. Experiment measures the chemical
 shift which
  is the chemical shielding relative to that of a reference molecule such as
 TMS (tetramethylsilane). The relative isotropic shielding is the quantity
 normally observed, for example in liquid samples. The anisotropy can be
 obtained from solid state measu
 rements and can be important in relaxation. Chemical shielding is a
 tensor quantity and G94 gives you all 9 components in the frame you have
 chosen.
 The isotropic shielding is (sigma xx + sigma yy + sigma zz)/3. The
 anisotropy
  is sigma 33 - (sigma 11 + sigma 22)/2 where 1,2,3 refer to the
 principal
 axis frame  and sigma 33> sigma 22 >sigma 11. The chemical shift is
 sigma (reference)- sigma (compound) where sigma is the isotropic
 shielding.
  Hope this is some help
 Elaine A. Moore Chemistry Dept. The Open University UK
  ---4---
 From: evaldera[ AT ]inti.ivic.ve (Elmer Valderrama)
 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:28:48 +0000 (GMT)
   Hi,
   Anisotropy only shows up in ordered media (crystalls, liquid-crystals).
   Organic compounds may be in solid state. As such, -e.g. not disolved in
   any solvent-, they may be "measured" in a RMN experiment. If,
 to this end,
   a direction of the crystal have been chosen, it may happen that the shift
   measured in the perpendicular to this chosen direction shows different.
  Then
   you'll have a diference which is called anisotropy. Moreover, -and for
  this
   it's better to read the reference below-, since the chem. shift actually is a
   tensor you'd have to compute three components (the diagonal) relative to
   the chosen direction in the crystal.
   In isotropic media (a mix of crystalls, no direction can be especified,
   or in liquid/solved sample) the shift is just the common measured
 quantity
   which physically is equal to one third of the trace of the above mencioned
   tensor.
   ..my two cents, hope it helps.
   Elmer Valderrama
   [1]  K. Eichele, et al. "Phosphorus-31 Chemical Shift of Phosphinidene
        Ligands in Ruthenium Carbonyl Cluster Compounds: A 31-P Single
        Crystal and CP/MAS-NMR Study"
        J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1995,117,6961-6969   [and ref there in]
        (This work includes an orbital study using CACAO and a qualitative
         application of Ramsey's theory)
 ---5---
 From: willsd[ AT ]APPSTATE.BITNET
 To: Mori Seiji <smori[ AT ]chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:51:13 -0400 (EDT)
 Seiji:
 I ran into this proble recently and have a suggestion:
 1) You need the isotropic part of the shielding tensor.
 2) Chemical shifts can be calculated from this isotropic part using some
 simple theory:  I recommend the information in chapter 2 of :
 Multinuclear NMR, J. Mason Ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1987.
 You will also need the isotropic shielding for the chemical shift
 standard for your nucleus. (In my case it was (EtO)2.BF3 for 11B NMR).
 Steve Williams
 Chemistry
 Appalachian State University
 Boone, NC 28608
 willsd[ AT ]appstate.edu
 ---6---
 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 12:08:48 +1000
 To: smori[ AT ]chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Mori Seiji)
 From: hughc[ AT ]extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Hugh Capper)
 Dear Mori,
  isotropic =  having the same physical arrangement of moieties around
  the
 atom of interest which in this case is the proton  ( if you are doing proton
 specroscopy)
  anitrosopy = is the reverse ie having different moities which cause
 diffences around the proton of interest.  anitrosopy is reflected in the
 chemical shift.
 As for a reference a good basic text is Fundamentals of NMR Spectroscopy
 by Derome.
 best wishes,
 Hugh Capper
 Institute for Magnetic Resonance Research
 University of Sydney
 NSW 2006
 Australia
 ---7---
 From: mjf[ AT ]biosym.com (Mark J Forster )
 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:03:11 -0800
 ( You can see in CCL archive list.)
 --- end---
 ####################################################
   Seiji Mori
   Graduate student in Nakamura Laboratory
   Department of Chemistry
   The University of Tokyo
   Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyou-ku, Tokyo 113, JAPAN.
   email:smori[ AT ]chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
 ####################################################