From serge@org.chem.msu.su  Mon Jul  7 07:50:26 1997
Received: from org.chem.msu.su  for serge@org.chem.msu.su
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA08150; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 07:45:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from org-qsar7.chem.msu.su (org-qsar7.chem.msu.su [158.250.48.104])
	by org.chem.msu.su (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA07805
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 15:45:30 +0400 (MSD)
Message-Id: <199707071145.PAA07805@org.chem.msu.su>
From: "Serge A. Pisarev" <serge@qsar.chem.msu.su>
To: <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Object-oriented means for computational chemistry programming
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 15:47:09 +0400
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1160
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BC8AED.079DDE00"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01BC8AED.079DDE00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear CCL'ers!
FORTRAN still remains the main programming language of computational
chemistry. But 
I wonder if anybody knew about the programs where methods computational
chemistry and, in particular quantum mechanical (ab initio or
semiempirical), MM or QM/MM force field methods are developed by means of
object-oriented languages (C++ preferably). I know Hyperchem is announced
to be of that kind. What else?
Is there any benchmarks where their characteristics are presented as
compared to FORTRAN programs? Is there any sufficient difference in the
speed of computation?
I will summarize the answers if it would be of interest.
Thanks in advance and best regards to all
Serge
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 Serge A. Pisarev, PhD student, Department of Organic Chemistry,
 Moscow State University: Vorobievy Hills, Zip 119899, Moscow, Russia
 email : serge@org.chem.msu.su
 URL : http://org.chem.msu.su/~serge/
_______________________________________,,,_(@)_(@)_,,,_____________________

------=_NextPart_000_01BC8AED.079DDE00
Content-Type: text/html; charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head></head><BODY bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><p><font size=3D2 =
color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Courier New">Dear CCL'ers!<br>FORTRAN still =
remains the main programming language of computational chemistry. But =
<br>I wonder if anybody knew about the programs where methods =
computational chemistry and, in particular quantum mechanical (ab initio =
or semiempirical), MM or QM/MM force field methods are developed by =
means of object-oriented languages (C++ preferably). I know Hyperchem is =
announced to be of that kind. What else?<br>Is there any benchmarks =
where their characteristics are presented as compared to FORTRAN =
programs? Is there any sufficient difference in the speed of =
computation?<br>I will summarize the answers if it would be of =
interest.<br>Thanks in advance and best regards to =
all<br>Serge<br>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^=
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br> Serge A. Pisarev, PhD student, Department of =
Organic Chemistry,<br> Moscow State University: Vorobievy Hills, Zip =
119899, Moscow, Russia<br> email : serge@org.chem.msu.su<br> URL : =
http://org.chem.msu.su/~serge/<br>_______________________________________=
,,,_(@)_(@)_,,,_____________________<br><font size=3D2><br></p>
</font></font></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_01BC8AED.079DDE00--



