From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul 20 04:52:27 2000
Received: from smtprelay.ruc.dk (smtprelay.ruc.dk [130.225.220.22])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA05250
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:52:26 -0400
Received: from virgil.ruc.dk (virgil.ruc.dk [130.225.220.110])
	by smtprelay.ruc.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24738
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 10:44:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from VIRGIL/SpoolDir by virgil.ruc.dk (Mercury 1.44);
    20 Jul 00 10:43:18 +0100
Received: from SpoolDir by VIRGIL (Mercury 1.44); 20 Jul 00 10:43:12 +0100
From: "Jens Spanget-Larsen" <jsl@virgil.ruc.dk>
Organization: Roskilde Universitetscenter
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 10:43:01 +0100
Subject: CCL: Seeing molecular orbitals?
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)
Message-ID: <92CE6BB1672@virgil.ruc.dk>

Dear CCL:

In a recent, most interesting publication ('Seeing molecular orbitals', 
Chem.Phys.Letters 321, 78-82 [2000]) scanning tunneling microscopy is used to 
observe the shapes of single molecular orbitals of the fullerene C60: 

  "..the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) is probing a single molecular 
  orbital (MO)."  

However, this reminds me of previous statements in the literature some time 
ago, associated with the advent of molecular photoelectron spectroscopy, f.i. 

  "Chemists can see the orbital structure of even fairly large molecules and no 
  longer have to rely on the predictions of theoreticians"

  "Photoelectron spectroscopy has demonstrated experimentally to chemists,
  physicists and other sceptics that molecular orbitals really do exist"

I wonder whether this is acceptable terminology, considering the fact 
that molecular orbitals are model constructs; they are not physical 
observables. By using approximations, such as Koopmans' approximation, many 
experimental observations can be conveniently interpreted in terms of 
theoretical MO data. But strictly speaking, this does not turn MOs into 
observable quantities; MOs have no physical existence.

Any comments?

Yours, Jens >--<
                             
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JENS SPANGET-LARSEN         Phone:  +45 4674 2000  (RUC)
Department of Chemistry             +45 4674 2710  (direct)
Roskilde University (RUC)   Fax:    +45 4674 3011 
P.O.Box 260                 E-Mail: JSL@virgil.ruc.dk
DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark   http://www.rub.ruc.dk/dis/chem/psos/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


