Re: CCL:Seeing molecular orbitals?
- From: "Jens Spanget-Larsen" <jsl "-at-"
virgil.ruc.dk>
- Organization: Roskilde Universitetscenter
- Subject: Re: CCL:Seeing molecular orbitals?
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:06:37 +0100
Henry Pang:
> I am new to computational chemistry. My background is medicine and human
> ecology in Australia. Your post is the first indicator I have seen over a
wide
> range of CCL and books which signals caution. I am overwhelmed by the
volume
> and intensity of work on the methodology and mensuration of molecules, as
if
> that were the end in itself. No where do I see any concern for a Philosophy
of
> Computational Chemistry, which addresses just what is computational
chemistry
> and what its purpose might be in our Universe. I cannot believe the
objective
> is merely to measure everything and simply document these data?
>
> Even at my early stage, I am seriously pondering writing material jointly
with
> my academic supervisor who is a computational chemist, which sets out the
link
> (as I see it) between cosmology, quantum theory, relativity and higher
> dimensions theory on the one hand and computational chemistry on the other.
I
> think molecules are the beautiful building blocks of our Universe and
created
> for a purpose. I decline the view molecules are just chance particles. I
> suspect from my reading of CCL, my intention may be seen as revolutionary
if
> not outrageous and could well cause an uproar?
Dear Henry,
thank you for your comments. However, my little message "Seeing molecular
orbitals?" was not intended to be highly philosophical. - The
"molecular
orbital" is a model concept, a one-electron wavefunction which serves as a
convenient building block in the description of molecular many-electron states,
but it is not an "observable" in the physical, quantum mechanical
sense. In
the molecular orbital approximation, the instantaneous correlation of the
movements of the individual electrons is neglected; the electrons are allowed
to "feel" each other only in an average manner. Hence, per
definition, the
molecular orbital has no "physical existence", no matter what you
imply by the
word 'existence'.
Yours, Jens >--<
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JENS SPANGET-LARSEN Phone: +45 4674 2000 (RUC)
Department of Chemistry +45 4674 2710 (direct)
Roskilde University (RUC) Fax: +45 4674 3011
P.O.Box 260 E-Mail: JSL "-at-" virgil.ruc.dk
DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark http://www.rub.ruc.dk/dis/chem/psos/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=