Re: CCL:Crystal structure vs geometry optimised structure
- From: John Bushnell <bushnell/at/chem.ucsb.edu>
- Subject: Re: CCL:Crystal structure vs geometry optimised
structure
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
For doing frequency calculations, you will want to use the DFT
optimized structures, as the calculation won't be very meaningful
otherwise. You should only be calculating frequencies at a minimum.
If your DFT structures are in excellent agreement with your crystal
structures, you are probably better off using the DFT optimized
structures for energy comparisons as well. Of course, if in certain
cases your DFT optimized structures were fundamentally different from
the crystal structures, the DFT energy comparison might not make much
sense if you are trying to examine the energetic differences between
your (crystal) samples.
Hope that helps - John
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 noel.oboyle2/at/mail.dcu.ie wrote:
> Hello CCLers,
> I intend to carry out DFT calculations on inorganic complexes. In some
cases
> I have crystal structures available.
>
> Is it better to use crystal structures as a starting point for energy
> and frequency calculations, or to use DFT-optimised structures? (where
> the DFT-optimised structure is in excellent agreement with the crystal
> structure)
>
> Thanks,
> Noel O'Boyle
> Han Vos Research Group,
> Dublin City University.
>
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject:
line
> and send your message to: CHEMISTRY/at/ccl.net
>
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to:
CHEMISTRY-REQUEST/at/ccl.net
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>
> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
> Jan Labanowski, jkl/at/ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>
>
>