From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Nov 9 12:37:00 2005 From: "Elaine Meng meng|,|cgl.ucsf.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Active site volume and surface exposure Message-Id: <-29911-051109123443-28595-1lXP93zWATjWcqWbiIZ5WA(!)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Elaine Meng Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:57:12 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Sent to CCL by: Elaine Meng [meng ~ cgl.ucsf.edu] Hi Kim, The following papers used an RMS distance of interface atoms to a least-squares plane (there are many more papers, but these will get you started): Jones and Thornton. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J Mol Biol. 1997 Sep 12;272(1):133-43. Chakrabarti and Janin. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins. 2002 May 15;47(3):334-43. Another measure I've seen is length to width to depth: Preissner, Goede, and Frommel. Dictionary of interfaces in proteins (DIP). Data bank of complementary molecular surface patches. J Mol Biol. 1998 Jul 17;280(3):535-50. Hope this helps, Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. meng{=}cgl.ucsf.edu UCSF Computer Graphics Lab and Babbitt Lab Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/meng/index.html > Sent to CCL by: Kim Branson [kim.branson(~)gmail.com] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi all, > > I'm currently looking for a method that can determine the volume of an > active site and its surface exposure. I'm conducting a validation > study > on protein-protein interaction inhibitors and i would like to quantify > the oft heard expression "protein-protein interfaces are often flat > featureless surfaces". I'd like to compare the binding sites to > that of > other systems, and hopefully examine the relationship between scoring > function performance and active site volume/surface exposure. > > I have a crude metric using the ratio of the volume of the active site > to the total solvent accessible surface of my defined binding > region. I > feel there might be a better way to do this. > > cheers > > Kim