From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sun Nov 20 13:42:00 2005 From: "errol lewars elewars%x%trentu.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Is CASSCF appropriate for study of PES? Message-Id: <-30012-051120131117-25829-kc3HqW59mMwSJpvAgqos6Q^-^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: errol lewars Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:11:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: errol lewars [elewars(!)trentu.ca] 2005 Nov 20 If your reaction is A--> B size-consistency (SC) should not be a problem. If it is A--> B + C, e.g. the energy of a dimer compared to the separated monomers, you have to worry about SC. "No good way... virtual orbitals". CASSCF is not a model chemistry (see e.g. Foresman and Frisch, "Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structutre Methods", so there in no _automatic_ way to choose the MOs of the active space. But people still use CASSCF and get useful results. E. Lewars === Yingbin Ge yingbin.ge^gmail.com wrote: >Sent to CCL by: Yingbin Ge [yingbin.ge]![gmail.com] >------=_Part_4657_175608.1132432456569 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >Content-Disposition: inline > >Hi CCLers, > I am studying the PES of a small molecule and wondering >whether CASSCF or CASPT2//CASSCF is an appropriate >method for the PES study since these methods are not >size consistent. Another downside of using CAS is that there >is no good way of choosing virtual orbitals into the active space. > Any comments? > Thanks a lot! >Yingbin > >------=_Part_4657_175608.1132432456569 >Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >Content-Disposition: inline > >
Hi CCLers,
>
 
>
I am studying the PES of a small molecule and wondering
>
whether CASSCF or CASPT2//CASSCF is an appropriate
>
method for the PES study since these methods are not
>
size consistent. Another downside of using CAS is that there > >
is no good way of choosing virtual orbitals into the active space.v> >
 
>
Any comments?
>
 
>
Thanks a lot!
>
Yingbin
> >------=_Part_4657_175608.1132432456569--> > > > >