CCL: [Bad Mail]RE: OPT on large molecules
- From: "Abrash, Samuel" <sabrash a
richmond.edu>
- Subject: CCL: [Bad Mail]RE: OPT on large molecules
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:04:03 -0500
Sent to CCL by: "Abrash, Samuel" [sabrash!=!richmond.edu]
Could you use quantum monte carlo to do the optimization?
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Shobe, David dshobe[#]sud-chemieinc.com [mailto:owner-chemistry.:.ccl.net]
Sent: Mon 1/30/2006 12:14 PM
To: Abrash, Samuel
Cc:
Subject: CCL: OPT on large molecules
Sent to CCL by: "Shobe, David" [dshobe..:..sud-chemieinc.com]
We still haven't answered the main question: will the lack of
optimization
significantly effect the intramolecular charge transfer? I'll assume here that
the
effect in question does not involve vibrational frequencies.
Even if the use of an arbitrary geometry doesn't materially change the
results of
the calculation, I would imagine you'd have some trouble convincing peer
reviewers
of that. But there are some options (besides just being patient :-).
1. You could use molecualr mechanics to do the optimization
2. You could use an X-ray diffraction or other published structure, if
one exists.
3. You could repeat the calculation at several geometries to demonstrate
that,
indeed, the calculated results do not have a significant dependence on molecular
geometry.
The idea of checking whether the effect occurs at all, using an
arbitrary but
reasonable geometry, might not be a bad one. After this investigational
calculation, you could then decide whetehr it's worthwhile to redo the
calculation
with a proper geometry (and with all the other i's dotted and t's crossed, as it
were).
--David Shobe, Ph.D., M.L.S.
Süd-Chemie, Inc.
phone (502) 634-7409
fax (502) 634-7724
Don't bother flaming me: I'm behind a firewall.
-----Original Message-----
> From: owner-chemistry%a%ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry%a%ccl.net]
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 3:48 PM
To: Shobe, David
Subject: CCL: OPT on large molecules
Sent to CCL by: "David M. Close" [closed(_)etsu.edu]
CCLers:
I have a question about the necessity of optimizations. I have
uncovered an
effect experimentally that involves changes in large molecules. By large I mean
that even partial optimizations with modest basis sets take several days. The
effect involves charge migration from one region of the molecule to another
region. I would like to examine this effect with computations. After a weeks
work I still don't have an answer because of the times taken to determine the
optimized structures.
I realize that the correct approach is to do calculations on the
optimized
structures. For example, it is necessary to do frequency calculations on the
optimized structures using the same basis sets in both calculations. But what
if
one didn't use the optimized structures? Suppose one only used a good guess at
the optimized structure? Would this cause the later calculations to be invalid?
Or might they be good enough to at least decide if the effect of interest is
present and that actual optimizations are worthwhile?
Regards, Dave Close.
[Edited by jkl.:.ccl.net to removed winmail.dat attachment]