CCL:G: Where might be my mistake in calculation by Turbomole using TDDFT?



 Sent to CCL by: Uwe Huniar [uwe.huniar/a\cosmologic.de]
 Dear Arvydas,
 
Turbomole support requests can be addressed to turbomole_a_cosmologic_de or support_a_turbomole_com, questions to the Turbomole user community can be posted to the Turbomole user forum www.turbo-forum.com
 
As Mariusz already wrote, Turbomole does ask for epsilon - this is the very first entry that is asked for in cosmoprep.
 
COSMO is not fully implemented in the TDDFT part of Turbomole in the official release. The so called 'fast term' in the CPKS equations is missing. The developers version of Turbomole has a full implementation which will be included in the next version - but as far as I know, this term has only small contributions to the excited state energies.
 
LanL2DZ: The basis set that is closest to LanL2DZ is def-SVP, but def-SVP is larger and has different ECPs. You can also download LanL2DZ from the EMSL site in Turbomole format. However, for TDDFT and hybrid functionals, a larger basis set should be more accurate, I would recommend to use def2-TZVP (def2-* are the latest, revised, triple-zeta basis sets from Karlsruhe, def-* are the older ones) for all elements up to Lr.
 
We have done solely specification of solvent but received very bad Turbomole TDDFT B3LYP/LanL2DZ spectrum of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in comparison with right spectrum obtained by Gaussian03:
 Did you also compare to experiment?
 
  Excited State   5:   Singlet-E      2.7424 eV  452.09 nm  f=0.0077
  Excited State   6:   Singlet-E      2.7424 eV  452.09 nm  f=0.0077
  Excited state symmetry could not be determined.
  Excited State   7:   Singlet-?Sym    2.8873 eV  429.41 nm  f=0.1097
  Excited state symmetry could not be determined.
  Excited State   8:   Singlet-?Sym    2.8873 eV  429.41 nm  f=0.1097
 (f - are bad in G03 for [Ru(bpy)3]2+)
 
 >
 
Where might be my mistake in calculation by Turbomole using TDDFT B3LYP spectrum of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ using COSMO ?
 
If you did switch on symmetry, please make sure to calculate the excited states of all irreps ($soes all <N>).
 Regards,
 Uwe