CCL: Protein-Ligand CONSTRAINED Docking
- From: <Vidana.Epa^^csiro.au>
- Subject: CCL: Protein-Ligand CONSTRAINED Docking
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:23:51 +1000
Sent to CCL by: [Vidana.Epa^csiro.au]
Hi Richard,
Doesn't the "-fmatch" option of Surflex-Dock (constraining the
docking to a pre-placed fragment) do what you need to achieve?
I am also curious as to why you came to the conclusion that
Glide is not up to your standards.
Cheers,
Vidana.
Vidana C. Epa
CSIRO,
Division of Molecular Health & Technologies,
343 Royal Parade,
Parkville, Victoria 3052,
AUSTRALIA.
tel: (61) - 3 - 9662 - 7345
fax:(61) - 3 - 9662 - 7347
email: Vidana.Epa++csiro.au
-----Original Message-----
> From: owner-chemistry++ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry++ccl.net]
Sent: Friday, 11 July 2008 8:07 AM
To: Epa, Vidana (CMHT, Parkville)
Subject: CCL: Protein-Ligand CONSTRAINED Docking
Sent to CCL by: "Richard Wood" [rwoodphd##msn.com]
Hi all,
I have a series of ligands which I've docked to a protein using
Surflex-Dock as implemented in Sybyl.
Unfortunately, my results don't explain some experimental observations
so I would like to do some contrained docking.
I've been looking into FlexX-Pharm, but it seems to only allow one to
constrain an ELEMENT of the ligand to be a certain radius from a
certain atom (which one can choose) in the protein target. For
example, one can pick a nitrogen in a ligand to be within a 3.0
Angstrom radius of a given protein atom, say.
This is problematic if your ligand has several nitrogens or carbons in
them, as one cannot pick atom types or atom numbers. I'm wondering if
there is a workaround to this; I'd like to stay with Sybyl as my boss
wants me to use it, and we've decided Glide is not up to our standards.
To conclude, I would like to be able to pick a particular ligand atom
and
constrain it to be a certain distance from a protein atom, that I again
pick, and then dock it. As it stands now, I can only constrain a (any)
nitrogen in my ligand (I think the fact that my ligand is not
introduced at any point, prior to docking, into this process is what is
problematic) to be within a radius of a protein atom, and not a fixed
distance.
Basically, I want to constrain an imidazole nitrogen
(say) to be 2.4 Angstroms away from an iron atom in a heme group, or a
methyl group to be 3.0 Angstroms from the same atom, and not WITHIN a
radius of this distance, since it can be anywhere from 0 to the
distance I want, and lead to situations I'm seeing now, where the
molecule I'm docking is on top of the heme.
TIA,
Richard
-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messageSubscribe/Unsubscribe:
Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt