The idea of a specific computational chemistry wiki is
not to undermine
or compete with Wikipedia. The idea is to complement Wikipedia, blogs,
books and papers. Wikipedia is extremely helpful, and if I had the
knowledge I would have loved to contribute there. More than that, as
far
as I’m concerned if you look for something basic like DFT in the
new
wiki there should be only a reference to the entry in Wikipedia.
But I cannot expect Wikipedia to have a specific entry on,
let’s say,
BP86 or UFF. Neither I suppose we can add there a table with the mean
error of the different post-HF geometry bond lengths, or a list of the
programs that can run M06. But most of all, I’d like an up to
date
encyclopedia where if I search for “MP4” it won’t
appear with a
multimedia player.
And, as Brian says, Wikipedia is not for self-publicity, and most of
the
new methods that appear in computational chemistry cannot enter there
unless they are really fundamental methods. This takes years, and leave
most methods outside.
Again, for those that are real specialists on traditional methods, I
encourage them to write in Wikipedia. But all the information that can
be useful only for computational chemists, I encourage to put it in
this
specific wiki.
Take into account that the same people of Wikipedia support the
creation
of specific encyclopedias for specific communities.
Again, if you like the idea and want to contribute, the page is
http://computationalchemistry.wikia.com
<http://computationalchemistry.wikia.com/>;
Maybe it will work, maybe not. But for sure it's worth to try it.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
..........Sebastian Kozuch...........
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...The Lise Meitner-Minerva Center...
.for Computational Quantum Chemistry.
...Hebrew University of Jerusalem....
.....kozuchs]*[yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il.....
http://yfaat.ch.huji.ac.il/kozuch.htm
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Brian Salter-Duke brian.james.duke---gmail.com
<owner-chemistry]*[ccl.net>
*To:* "Kozuch, Sebastian " <kozuchs]*[yahoo.com>
*Sent:* Friday, April 24, 2009 2:02:53 AM
*Subject:* CCL: Computational Chemistry Wiki
Sent to CCL by: Brian Salter-Duke [brian.james.duke:-:gmail.com
<http://gmail.com/>;]
Lukasz Cwiklik cwiklik]^[gmail.com wrote:
> Sent to CCL by: Lukasz Cwiklik [cwiklik..gmail.com]
> Dear Sebastian,
> I do not want to undermine your idea of a new wiki, however, this kind
> of wiki exist, it is simply in Wikipedia (see 'Computational
> Chemistry' article which covers a similar range of topics:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_chemistry). So
maybe it
> would be better and easier to encourage CCL-ers to extend the existing
> Wikipedia articles in this topic. Also, the resulting information
> would be much more accessible for the general audience.
> Anyway, your idea to convince people to write something in the wiki
> system is very good.
> Best,
> Lukasz
>
I word of caution about using wikipedia for the purposes proposed by
the
original poster of this thread, from one of the people Henry referred
to
who tries to upgrade, improve and protect the wikipedia articles on
computational chemistry. Wipedia has its own policies and guidelines.
We
are writing an encyclopis based on what others have said. Everything
should be referenced. Original research is not allowed. So "new
ones,
which implies that the authors of those methods are welcomed to make
self-publicity" is an absolute no-no. Anyone trying to do that,
would
experience serious grief, with the material being promptly removed by
someone, possibly me.
There is also the science wiki, which was the original a computational
chemistry wiki, as you can see from the URL it still has. Here is the
main QC entry point:-
http://www.compchemwiki.org/index.php?title=Quantum_chemistry
The original purpose was rather different from what is suggested here,
as it was to collect together QC results. It also not very active.
I would encourage readers of CCL to help maintain and develop the
wikipedia pages, but I suggest you move in slowly and learn how the
place works. One problem with the CC and QC articles is that are often
dominated by physicists and become almost unintelligible to chemists.
They need to cover both physics and chemistry viewpoints. I sometimes
give up on these articles and edit something completely different as a
break from CC. I am happy to assist anyone. I am User:Bduke on
wikipedia.
Brian.> the strange characters on the top line to the ]*[ sign. You
can also>
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY]*[ccl.net <mailto:CHEMISTRY]*[ccl.net>
or use:
E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST]*[ccl.net
<mailto:CHEMISTRY-REQUEST]*[ccl.net> or usehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml>;