From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 30 07:57:00 2009
From: "Vincent.Leroux[A]loria.fr" <owner-chemistry]^[server.ccl.net>
To: CCL
Subject: CCL: Docking Problem
Message-Id: <-39211-090430075524-10751-taquGaRCuZgQZdOp2wtNPA]^[server.ccl.net>
X-Original-From: Vincent.Leroux : loria.fr
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8;
 DelSp="Yes";
 format="flowed"
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:55:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0


Sent to CCL by: Vincent.Leroux(0)loria.fr
Probably that you ended up with the same docked conformation in both cases.


"Kshatresh Dutta Dubey kshatresh . gmail.com" =20
<owner-chemistry-.-ccl.net> a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:

> Dear subscribers ,
>  i have docked a ligand into a protein by both virtual docking as well as
> induced fit and  got same docking score. What does this result signifiy???=
??
>
>  thanks in advance
> Kshatresh dutta dubey
>