CCL:G: sulfur with 6-31G** and lanl2dz
- From: Jamin Krinsky <jamink^^^berkeley.edu>
- Subject: CCL:G: sulfur with 6-31G** and lanl2dz
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:55:33 -0700
Sent to CCL by: Jamin Krinsky [jamink]^[berkeley.edu]
Zineb,
For clarification, LANL2DZ uses D95V for Z<11, which is ALMOST
comparable to 6-31G(d,p), so it does have polarization. That being
said (and I don't think you were suggesting this but just in case),
you don't want to compare the energies using the two basis sets
anyway. Using an ECP basis for S is not generally ideal (partially
because LANL2DZ does NOT put polarization on P, S, etc.), you may want
to use 6-31G(d,p) for everything up to Ar and LANL2DZ for the
remainder. I assume you're using Gaussian, so you might want to check
out a tutorial for setting up custom basis sets here:
http://glab.cchem.berkeley.edu/glab/faqs/gauss_custombasis.html
Jamin
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Eric B. Isaacs ebisaacs-.-gmail.com
<owner-chemistry|-|ccl.net> wrote:
>
> Sent to CCL by: "Eric B. Isaacs" [ebisaacs.|-|.gmail.com]
> Hi Zineb,
>
> As far as I know the LANL2DZ basis set is actually 6-31G for atoms with
> Z<11, so if all the atoms i quinoxaline n your other derivatives meet
this
> criterion then you should expect the total energies to be pretty close to
> 6-31G(d,p) -- there should just be some small change
>>
>> from the addition of polarization functions. In contrast, when you're
>
> using the pseudopotential/effective core potential with the
> sulfur-containing molecule some of the sulfur electrons are not being
> treated explicitly, so the total energy should change significantly.
>
> Eric
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 7:15 PM, zouzou adnani zinebeladnani-*-hotmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Sent to CCL by: "zouzou adnani"
[zinebeladnani#,#hotmail.com]
>> hi
>> I'm working on the geometry optimisation of the some quinoxaline
>> derivatives using different basis set , in most of my systems I have
almost
>> the same energies with both 6-31G(d,p) and lanl2dz basis sets, except
in
>> those containing sulfur atoms, can anyone tell me why?
>> Thanks for taking the time to read this!
>> Regards,
>> Zineb el adnani> > >
> Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobsConferences:
> http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/>
>
>
>
--
Jamin L Krinsky, Ph.D.
Molecular Graphics and Computation Facility
175 Tan Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
jamink|-|berkeley.edu, 510-643-0616
http://glab.cchem.berkeley.edu