From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Mon Jan 17 08:23:00 2011 From: "Andreas Klamt klamt ~~ cosmologic.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Pioglitazone Tautomers Message-Id: <-43660-110117012358-751-bGPL7hcygXq72fXhx+mVww() server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Andreas Klamt Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:23:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Andreas Klamt [klamt+*+cosmologic.de] Yes that is what we would conclude from a 12 kcal/mol taumtomer energy difference predicted by DFT/COSMO-RS in water.
If there should be any exp. insight contradicting this conclusion I would be happy to learn about it. (Also if there should be soem supporting our conclusion?)

Andreas

Am 16.01.2011 19:29, schrieb Nancy nancy5villa**gmail.com:
Using quantum chemical calculations, you found that the diketone form is dominant; does this mean that the enol form predicted by MarvinSketch v3.5.4 in the published article is wrong?

"Structure-based design of a thiazolidinedione which targets the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET" Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010 Feb 1;20(3):819-23

Thanks,
Nancy


On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Andreas Klamt klamt(a)cosmologic.de <owner-chemistry(~)ccl.net> wrote:
Sent to CCL by: Andreas Klamt [klamt,cosmologic.de]
Hi Nancy,

as I wrote in the previous message, we find by quantum chemical calculations within the COSMO-RS solvation that the diketone form is more stable by abot 12 kcal/mol, that means it absolutely dominates!

Andreas

Am 13.01.2011 22:25, schrieb Nancy nancy5villa~!~gmail.com:
Hi All,

I happened to find a published article where molecular docking simulations of TZDs against a novel protein is detailed:

"Structure-based design of a thiazolidinedione which targets the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET" Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010 Feb 1;20(3):819-23

In this paper, the authors, using MarvinSketch v3.5.4, determined that the TZDs would exist predominantly in the enol form at pH 7.4, as opposed to the diketone form (see attached figure).  It appears that the article's tautomer prediction was based only on the pH prior to docking, and had nothing to do with ligand-protein interactions.

Does anyone know if the diketone or enol, or perhaps a different tautomer, would be predominant at pH 7.4?

Thanks in advance.
Nancy



On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andreas Klamt klamt-*-cosmologic.de <owner-chemistry(_)ccl.net> wrote:

Sent to CCL by: Andreas Klamt [klamt[*]cosmologic.de]
Hi All,

let me put my 5 cents into the game:
We have done quantum calculations for the heterocyclic ring, with just a methyl group, since electronically the remainder of the compound should have almost no influence on the heterocycle.
DFT/COSMO-RS calculations prove the neutral species
SMILES:CC1C(=O)[NH]C(=O)S1 of the Pioglitazone heterocycle to be favored by 11.3 kcal/mol compared to all other neutral species of the heterocycle, which means that there is no other relvant neutral form.

We find with COSMOtherm that the pka of the heterocycle is 6.55, i.e. at pH=7 it should be deprotonated with about 25%.
Since the pka of the conj. acid of the pyridine ring according to COSMOtherm (we calculated diethylpyridine) is ~5.6 there should be ~10% in the zwitterionic form.

It will be hard to decide this finally, unless someone measures it, but we are quite confident to be qualitatively right here, because the energy differences for the tautomers should not have more than 5 kcal/mol erro, as we learned in in the SAMPL2 tautomer contest:
see Andreas Klamt and Michael Diedenhofen, Some conclusions regarding the predictions of tautomeric equilibria in solution based on the SAMPL2 challenge, http://www.springerlink.com/content/l577667th758n6h1/

Andreas







Hi All,

Using MarvinSketch v5.3.3 (ChemAxon software), the predicted pKa value
of the acidic hydrogen on the thiazolidinedione ring of pioglitazone is
4.57 (see attached "Figure_1.gif"). Therefore, the predominant species
at pH 7.0 predicted by MarvinSketch is the one depicted in
"Figure_2.gif". The different tautomeric forms predicted by MarvinSketch
are shown in "Figure_3.gif".

Can anyone explain where these predictions come from, and if they are
correct?

Thanks,
Nancy


On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Gabriele Cruciani
gabri(0)chemiome.chm.unipg.it <http://chemiome.chm.unipg.it>

<owner-chemistry[a]ccl.net <mailto:owner-chemistry[a]ccl.net>> wrote:


   Sent to CCL by: Gabriele Cruciani [gabri##chemiome.chm.unipg.it
   <http://chemiome.chm.unipg.it>]

   Nancy,
   the first form you reported is the most stable in water at pH 7.0.
   However, the fact that one form is more stable than another in water
   does not help you to understand which form will be more 'relevant'
   for docking. In protein the tautomeric equilibria may produce and
   stabilize different forms according to the complementary site. There
   are examples of tautomeric form in protein not stable in water,
   where the energy difference is more than 5 Kcal/mol.

   MoKa software (www.moldiscovery.com <http://www.moldiscovery.com>)

   is fast and accurate to produce tautomer stable in water, but it can
   produce also all the (plausible) tautomeric forms.

   Then, a possibility is to dock them into your protein, to see if
   docking methods may differentiate their binding.

   Gabriele Cruciani




       Hi All,

       I am performing molecular docking and molecular dynamics
       simulations of the
       thiazolidinedione pioglitazone binding to the PPAR-gamma
       receptor protein
       (PDB ID: 1ZGY). The thiazolidinedione ring can exist in numerous
       different
       tautomeric states; I have attached a figure depicting several of
       them.
       Which tautomer would be dominant at the physiological pH of ~7.0?

       Also, are there any software programs that can predict which
       tautomer would
       be correct?

       Thanks in advance,
       Nancy>


   E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY[a]ccl.net
   <mailto:CHEMISTRY[a]ccl.net> or use:>
   E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST[a]ccl.net
   <mailto:CHEMISTRY-REQUEST[a]ccl.net> or useConferences:

--
Dr. Jens Reinisch
Chemist / Customer Support
COSMOlogic GmbH & Co. KG
Burscheider Strasse 515
D-51381 Leverkusen, Germany

phone   +49-2171-363664
mobile  +49-163-7337310
fax     +49-2171-731689
e-mail  reinisch[*]cosmologic.de
web     www.cosmologic.de

HRA 20653 Amtsgericht Koeln, GF: Dr. Andreas Klamt
Komplementaer: COSMOlogic Verwaltungs GmbH
HRB 49501 Amtsgericht Koeln, GF: Dr. Andreas Klamt



-- 
PD. Dr. Andreas Klamt
CEO / Geschäftsführer
COSMOlogic GmbH & Co. KG
Burscheider Strasse 515
D-51381 Leverkusen, Germany

phone  	+49-2171-731681
fax    	+49-2171-731689
e-mail 	klamt(_)cosmologic.de
web www.cosmologic.de HRA 20653 Amtsgericht Koeln, GF: Dr. Andreas Klamt Komplementaer: COSMOlogic Verwaltungs GmbH HRB 49501 Amtsgericht Koeln, GF: Dr. Andreas Klamt
CHEMISTRY(~)ccl.net or use: http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST(~)ccl.net or use http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/ Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/



-- 
PD. Dr. Andreas Klamt
CEO / Geschäftsführer
COSMOlogic GmbH & Co. KG
Burscheider Strasse 515
D-51381 Leverkusen, Germany

phone  	+49-2171-731681
fax    	+49-2171-731689
e-mail 	klamt]~[cosmologic.de
web    	www.cosmologic.de

HRA 20653 Amtsgericht Koeln, GF: Dr. Andreas Klamt
Komplementaer: COSMOlogic Verwaltungs GmbH
HRB 49501 Amtsgericht Koeln, GF: Dr. Andreas Klamt