CCL: Correctly drawing aromatic compounds
- From: <david.anick[A]rcn.com>
- Subject: CCL: Correctly drawing aromatic compounds
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
Dear Aaron,
If I am understanding you correctly, you have a
connectivity pattern or graph (in the mathematical sense) representing which
atoms are bonded to which in an organic molecule, and you want to know how many
of the bonds are double bonds?
It's easy. I will
assume your molecule consists of C, N, O, H only. You have two equations.
Let E be the number of valence electrons that are involved in bonding.
Then:
E = 4C + 3N + 2O + H + (net charge).
Because
every single bond uses two valence electrons and every double bond uses
four,
E = 2 * (single bonds) + 4 * (double bonds).
Put these
together and divide by 2 to get Equation (1):
Eq. (1)
(single bonds) + 2 * (double bonds) = [4C + 3N + 2O + H + (net charge) ] /
2.
Next, just count the total number of bonds in your
drawing. Obviously,
Eq. (2) (single bonds)
+ (double bonds) = (total # of bonds).
Your unknowns
here are (single bonds) and (double bonds). Everything else is known from
the drawing.
You have two equations in two unknowns.
Subtract Eq. (2) from Eq. (1) to get the # of double bonds. I think
the derivation and the two equations is clearest, but if you want me to do it
for you, your final answer is:
(double bonds)
= [4C + 3N + 2O + H + (net charge) ] / 2 - (total # of
bonds).
Example: Anthracene is C14H10 and has 16 CC
bonds and 10 CH bonds, giving
(total bonds) = 26. The formula
gives
(double bonds) = [4*14 + 10]/2 - (26) = 33 - 26 =
7.
There are several possible "resonance structures" for anthracene
but all of them use exactly 7 C=C double
bonds.
Obviously the formula will break down if there
are unfilled shells, and it would have to be modified if there are triple bonds
or 3rd row atoms. I suppose if you have halogen atoms they are the same as
"H" for the purposes of this calculation.
I hope this
is helpful!
David Anick PhD MD
Harvard
Medical School
---- Original message ----
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:57:36 -0400
From:
"Deskins, N Aaron nadeskins]-[WPI.EDU" <owner-chemistry |-at-|
ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: Correctly drawing aromatic
compounds
To: "Anick, David -id#3te-" <david.anick |-at-|
rcn.com>
>
>Sent to CCL by: "Deskins, N Aaron"
[nadeskins---WPI.EDU]
>Thank you all for your suggestions. Iâm
looking into other software (ChemDraw) that may do a better job drawing some of
these aromatics.
>
>But a more fundamental question is how do you
predict the number of double bonds? I donât want to have to assume that a
particular program is drawing the structure right, unless absolutely necessary.
Much better is to determine the number of C=C bonds myself (as mentioned in my
first email, I want to run some isodesmic reactions on these). Coronene and
other small aromatics are easy because there are plenty of references on these
structures. But Iâd like to look at other large compounds for which there
is likely little data available. Someone must have some theory/method to
determining the ideal number of double bonds in an aromatic structure.
>
>Any more ideas?
>
>N. Aaron Deskins
>Assistant
Professor
>Chemical Engineering Department
>Worcester Polytechnic
Institute
>http://users.wpi.edu/~nadeskins
>
>
>
>-=
This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
>To
recover the email address of the author of the message, please change
>the
strange characters on the top line to the |-at-| sign. You can
also
>look up the X-Original-From: line in the mail
header.
>
>E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY |-at-| ccl.net or
use:
>
http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
>
>E-mail to
administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST |-at-| ccl.net or use
>
http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml
>
>Before
posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net
>
>Job:
http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>Conferences:
http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/
>
>Search
Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
>
>If
your mail bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error, check:
>
http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt
>
>RTFI:
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/
>
>