CCL: Manifesto and scientific development

Any manifesto works more like an inhibitor of productivity and creativity, exactly because it, with this manifesto in particular, imposes a force factor on the premises of computational scientific creativity. Open source philopsophy is an enormous value to scientific creativity and allows all groups to contribute to the scientific arena. This philosophy is not in tune with such this  manifesto, it seems rather that the manifesto is correlated with a need to rigidify processes which have to be based on openess and sincerity among scientists and by the scrutinizing potential of reviewers. If a manifesto should replace that very profound criteria, we can as well pack our stuff and start working with something else. The nature of the manifesto is more inquisitory which is itself an original enemy of science. So why adopt such measures?
If a scientific work was falsified and presented incredible findings it would be naturally exposed and investigated by the scientific arena it self, because science is itself selv-investigating.


Sergio