CCL: Re: CCL: “Best” atomic charge model
- From: Christopher Cramer <cramer^^umn.edu>
- Subject: CCL: Re: CCL: “Best” atomic charge
model
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:54:06 -0500
Sent to CCL by: Christopher Cramer [cramer:+:umn.edu]
Sebastian,
I might say that the question, "What is the best partial atomic charge
model?" is in some sense incomplete -- or at least open to faith-based
responses, as there is no universally accepted measure of "best".
A more complete formulation would be, "What is the best partial atomic
charge model to [do something that can be quantitatively asessed]?" (much
as the paper you cite below emphasized through its title).
In our own work, we've taken [do something that can be quantitatively
asessed] to be "reproduce the correct molecular electric dipole moment
through distributed monopoles" and that has led to the CMx series of charge
models, the most recent one of which was published as Marenich, A. V.; Jerome,
S. V.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. "Charge Model 5: An Extension of
Hirshfeld Population Analysis for the Accurate Description of Molecular
Interactions in Gaseous and Condensed Phases" J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 2012,
8, 527 (doi:10.1021/ct200866d).
But, in spite of conventional partisanship, I would certainly accept that
other charge models might have greater utility for other purposes to which they
are planned to be put.
Best regards,
Chris
On Mar 31, 2012, at 3:00 AM, Sebastian Kozuch kozuchs-*-yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Sent to CCL by: Sebastian Kozuch [kozuchs^yahoo.com]
> Dear all,
> I've just read the article "What is the “best” atomic
charge model to describe through-space charge-transfer excitations?" (Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 5383)
> My question is quite traditional: Is there any atomic charge model
(Mulliken, Lowdin, Bader, NPA, etc) that can give reliable results on a wide
variety of properties? It is known that absolute charge values are useless, but
at least a method that provides consistent relative would be nice. I had too
many bad experiences trying to understand the charges on complexes with several
partition schemes.
>
> I know that several books already discussed this, and I'm sure this is not
the first time this is asked in CCL, but I would like to know the "state of
the art" opinion from the people that deal with this professionally.
>
> Best,
> Sebastian>
>
--
Christopher J. Cramer
Elmore H. Northey Professor
University of Minnesota
Department of Chemistry
207 Pleasant St. SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455-0431
--------------------------
Phone: (612) 624-0859 || FAX: (612) 626-7541
Mobile: (952) 297-2575
email: cramer..umn.edu
twitter: ..ChemProfCramer
http://pollux.chem.umn.edu
(website includes information about the textbook "Essentials
of Computational Chemistry: Theories and Models, 2nd Edition")