CCL: ICQC shame

["Clark, Aurora" <auclark++wsu.edu>]

Dear Sergio -

Of course it is true that in a highly specialized arena there will be a non-even distribution of gender amongst highly qualified experts, ICQC is not one of those conferences.  Further, in this particular instance, it is not even that there are no female speakers, there are no female Chairs or honorary Chairs either (see the original email posting).

 You may view a conference as being solely a scientific platform – but the reality of all conferences is that they are just as much about networking as they are about science. It is where undergraduates see potential graduate schools, it is where graduate students learn about people they may want to work for for post-docs, it is where assistant professors meet future program officers and collaborators, etc.  Thus there are political consequences in terms of people's career decisions and the opportunities made available to them. 

Working on the premise that there are qualified women scientists in the area of theoretical chemistry (which there are, well beyond the ability to give a good "teaching" talk) – it should be self-evident that including them makes your conference makes it a better and stronger conference on many levels. It is the responsibility of conference organizers to be aware enough about the impact that their decisions make upon others in the discipline. We do not exist in a vacuum. 

A

Aurora Clark

Associate Professor

Department of Chemistry

Washington State University

Pullman, Wa 99164

Ph: 509-335-3362

Fax: 509-335-8867

From: "Sergio Manzetti sergio.manzetti..outlook.com" <owner-chemistry!=!ccl.net>
Reply-To: CCL Subscribers <chemistry!=!ccl.net>
Date: Sunday, February 16, 2014 3:25 AM
To: Aurora Clark <auclark!=!wsu.edu>
Subject: CCL: ICQC shame

Dear Aurora,

 I am not sure that the number of women or the number of men defines the quality of a conference. It is the topics, the level of experience built in each topic, and naturally the experience of the presenters, whether they are men or women. I have seen both good men and good women in QM, the latter particularly in teaching. Conferences should be organized according to topics of research, independently of gender. Maybe this conference has topics that are mostly covered by one gender. That does however, not stop anyone from organizing another conference, where, occasionally, another gender is more overrepresented.

Again, the outfall of this is in the topic, scientific advance and expertise, not gender.

If one starts finding missing aspects in terms of WHO is behind the research, the research will disappear and be replaced by persons.

The person behind the research is not really of outomst relevant, it is the research, where I guess all researchers would agree one (men or women).

Cheers

> From: owner-chemistry|ccl.net
> To: sergio.manzetti|gmx.com
> Subject: CCL: ICQC shame
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:12:00 +0000
>
>
> Sent to CCL by: "Clark, Aurora" [auclark#,#wsu.edu]
> It is important to point out that this issue is much broader than
> merely including women in major theoretical conferences, it is about the
> repercussions of not including them and the implications to our field by
> maintaining a status quo that is closed minded. It is multifaceted, but
> inherently about the growth and development of theoretical chemistry as a
> discipline and not really about gender at all.
>
> Omitting women from major conferences affects a very large swath of
> scientist's careers, not only politically, but also in terms of the
> recognition and distribution of the new work they produce and in the
> recruitment and education of talented young people that are badly needed
> in any discipline in order for it to keep its relevance to the
> ever-changing tides of federal funding and an evolving scientific
> state-of-the-art.
>
> It is harder for scientists to get promoted if they are not invited to
> conferences where they are unable to network with potential collaborators,
> program officers, and reviewers of their dossiers. Networking works both
> ways, in that not only does it help the female scientist, but also the
> collaborator...what if you miss out on the next best algorithm for solving
> some complicated numerical problem because you had no opportunity to see a
> poster or talk from said female scientist? What if you pay for a grad
> student to work on this complicated numerical problem and end up paying
> valuable research dollars for this student to solve a problem that has
> already been addressed? What if the next Einstein is an undergrad working
> in your group and she decides she wants to go into Biology because she
> doesn't see anyone that respects her ideas or believes in her potential?
>
> One of the beautiful things about conferences is that they provide a
> platform for showcasing a large group of people working on a problem. If
> you omit an entire population, then you not only hurt those you omit, but
> also yourself and your own opportunities to learn and develop
> a research program, not to mention recruiting new talent to our programs.
> Without these things we degrade our field and eventually, it might not
> matter anymore because no one will see the value in pure, non-applied,
> theoretical chemistry anymore anyways.
>
> So - I view this string not merely about echoing the chorus of how
> terrible it is that there may be discrimination in our discipline, but
> also in the health and development of theoretical chemistry and what our
> field will look like 20 or 50 years from now.
>
>
> Cheers;
> Aurora
>
>
>
>
> Aurora Clark
> Associate Professor
> Department of Chemistry
> Washington State University
> Pullman, Wa 99164
> Ph: 509-335-3362
> Fax: 509-335-8867
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/15/14 2:57 PM, "Kadir Diri dirikadir[a]gmail.com"
> <owner-chemistry{=}ccl.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Sent to CCL by: Kadir Diri [dirikadir ~ gmail.com]
> >Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >I am posting this message on behalf of professor Anna Krylov -one of the
> >many outstanding women in theoretical chemistry- regarding the choice of
> >speakers for the upcoming ICQC conference.
> >
> >I would always like to think of us, scientists, as some of the leading
> >figures in the fight for gender equality. I wish the choice of speakers
> >for this conference was just a statistical abnormality. Even that would
> >be unacceptable...
> >
> >Professor Krylov's message follows below.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Kadir
> >---
> >
> >
> >Dear Colleague:
> >
> >It happened again --- another major theoretical chemistry conference
> >features an all-male program. One of us began boycotting such
> >conferences 14 years ago and can't believe that 14 years later we are
> >still seeing such overt discrimination. This time it is the 15th
> >International Congress of Quantum Chemistry (ICQC,
> >http://www.icqc2015.org) conducted under the auspices of International
> >Academy of Quantum Molecular Science (http://www.iaqms.org), which will
> >be held in Beijing, China. As of 02/15/2014, the program features 24
> >invited speakers and 5 chairs and honorary chairs and does not include a
> >single woman.
> >
> >Are there no women in theoretical chemistry? Hardly. The Women in
> >Theoretical Chemistry web-directory (http://iopenshell.usc.edu/wtc)
> >lists more than 300 female scientists holding tenured and tenure track
> >academic positions or equivalent positions in industry and other
> >research establishments pursuing research in theoretical and
> >computational chemistry, biochemistry, material science, as well as
> >theoretical molecular/atomic physics and biophysics. Many of these women
> >are far more distinguished than many of the men being invited to speak
> >at these conferences.
> >
> >Feeling as fed up and frustrated as we do? Add your voice to ours by
> >signing this open letter (http://chn.ge/NQGKUc) denouncing this biased
> >practice, which we had hoped would be obsolete long ago (it will take
> >less than a minute).
> >
> >Thank you for your for your support.
> >
> >Prof. Emily Carter, Princeton University
> >Prof. Laura Gagliardi, University of Minnesota
> >Prof. Anna Krylov, University of Southern California>
> >
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
> To recover the email address of the author of the message, please change
> the strange characters on the top line to the | sign. You can also
>
>
> E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY|ccl.net or use:
> http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
>
> E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST|ccl.net or use
> http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
>
>
>
>
> Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net
>
>
> Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/
>
> Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
>
>
> =r>>
> RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/
>
>