From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Apr 16 16:43:00 2014
From: "Jinsong Zhao jszhao]![yeah.net" <owner-chemistry^-^server.ccl.net>
To: CCL
Subject: CCL: Mopac6 and Mopac7 code
Message-Id: <-49928-140416162409-895-xBz9zx2R/HDps/BgEiTFuQ^-^server.ccl.net>
X-Original-From: Jinsong Zhao <jszhao^^yeah.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:23:49 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0


Sent to CCL by: Jinsong Zhao [jszhao]*[yeah.net]
Hello,

I just hope to get a credible code, and then read it. So I don't care 
about the binary release with plenty of new features.

Regards,
Jinsong

On 2014/4/16 0:35, Daniel Jana dfjana,,gmail.com wrote:
>
> Sent to CCL by: Daniel Jana [dfjana**gmail.com]
> Hello,
>
> The author of Mopac does not make immediately clear on the website
> which subversion you are downloading. The file is updated when a new
> version comes out, but the name stays the same. As such, downloads
> done in different moments may end up being different patch levels of
> Mopac.
>
> But I agree with Mark, why not do things properly and download it from
> the website? It's free and you are sure you download the latest
> version of the program (and with no malware attached).
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> On 16 April 2014 01:38, Jinsong Zhao jszhao/ayeah.net
> <owner-chemistry+*+ccl.net> wrote:
>>
>> Sent to CCL by: Jinsong Zhao [jszhao++yeah.net]
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I have googled and found that there are various copy of Mopac6 and Mopac7
>> code with different patch level. However, the reliability can not be
>> justified. Thus, I am wondering whether there is a copy of Mopac6 and/or
>> Mopac7 that are considered as credible by you, the computational chemist.
>> Thank you very much for any hints.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Jinsong
>