Sent to CCL by: Jinsong Zhao [jszhao]*[yeah.net]
Hello,
I just hope to get a credible code, and then read it. So I don't care about
the binary release with plenty of new features.
Regards,
Jinsong
On 2014/4/16 0:35, Daniel Jana dfjana,,gmail.com wrote:
Sent to CCL by: Daniel Jana [dfjana**gmail.com]
Hello,
The author of Mopac does not make immediately clear on the website
which subversion you are downloading. The file is updated when a new
version comes out, but the name stays the same. As such, downloads
done in different moments may end up being different patch levels of
Mopac.
But I agree with Mark, why not do things properly and download it from
the website? It's free and you are sure you download the latest
version of the program (and with no malware attached).
Best,
Daniel
On 16 April 2014 01:38, Jinsong Zhao jszhao/ayeah.net
<owner-chemistry+*+ccl.net> wrote:
Sent to CCL by: Jinsong Zhao [jszhao++yeah.net]
Hi there,
I have googled and found that there are various copy of Mopac6 and Mopac7
code with different patch level. However, the reliability can not be
justified. Thus, I am wondering whether there is a copy of Mopac6 and/or
Mopac7 that are considered as credible by you, the computational chemist.
Thank you very much for any hints.