From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Sep 22 07:01:00 2015
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?V=EDctor_Lua=F1a?= Cabal victor.||.fluor.quimica.uniovi.es" <owner-chemistry||server.ccl.net>
To: CCL
Subject: CCL:G: Case Studies of QM Computational Chemistry in Reactivity
Message-Id: <-51764-150922065827-18560-CJriOI/0y9H1Or7KgpcW1g||server.ccl.net>
X-Original-From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=EDctor_Lua=F1a?= Cabal <victor a fluor.quimica.uniovi.es>
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:40:40 +0200
MIME-version: 1.0


Sent to CCL by: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=EDctor_Lua=F1a?= Cabal [victor[-]fluor.quimica.uniovi.es]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:29:03AM +0200, Peter Jarowski peterjarowski[-]gmail.com wrote:
> Dear All:
> 
> The results of last week's survey can be found following the link below:
> 
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-ZZHHTKW2/
> 
> Some preliminary comments:
> 
> (1) 95% of respondents are computational chemists. So a clear community is
> being surveyed.
> (2) ca. 60% are Gaussian users. I note that I didn't include Turbomole in
> the list, but that this was often filled in in the other category.
> (3) We have a mixed community in Industry and Academia.
> (4) There are many resonances to the last question, you can scroll the last
> section to see all of them, its not obvious.

Pter,

I answered your survey and it was not clear for me if the system was accepting
more than one answer to the questions. This is relevant because I'm sure most
people in this field have used gaussian ... and many other electronic codes too.
So a 60% gaussian users may not be 60% users prefering gaussian over other
alternatives.

Regards,
        Victor Lua~na