CCL:G: Low-progression Franck-Condon transitions



 Sent to CCL by: tianxiaohui..zju.edu.cn
 dear Dr Julien,
 Thank you. Your explanations are very helpful. 
 I am confused by the TI results showed in GaussView. I can find two spectra
 there,one is directly broadened from the sticks (legend: Spectrum from
 reported transitions). But the second one (legend: The final spectrum), also the
 one printed in Gaussian output file, usually has higher 0-1 0-2 peaks than the
 other. I 'd like to know the difference and which should I use?
 By the way, the convergence of my TI result is 86.7%, is this value acceptable?
 Thanks a lot.
 Best regards.
 > from Tian.
 > -----原始邮件-----
 > 发件人: "Julien Bloino
 julien.bloino~!~gmail.com" <owner-chemistry]^[ccl.net>
 > 发送时间: 2018-11-02 05:08:07
 (星期五)
 > 收件人: "Tian, Xiaohui "
 <tianxiaohui]^[zju.edu.cn>
 > 抄送:
 > 主题: CCL:G: Low-progression Franck-Condon transitions
 >
 >
 > Sent to CCL by: "Julien Bloino" [julien.bloino:_:gmail.com]
 > Dear Dr. Krämer,
 >
 > As commented by Dr. Götze, the likely reason for the small progression
 > is a significant shift of one or more modes.
 > The keywords are for G16 and should be inserted in the `ReadFCHT`
 > section (Freq=ReadFCHT).
 > You can see the shift vector with
 > `Print=Matrix=K`
 > Depending on the symmetry and the structural changes, you may improve
 > the convergence by increasing the maximum number of quanta for the
 > overtones (MaxC1) and 2-modes combinations (MaxC2):
 > `Prescreening=(MaxC1=20,MaxC2=13)` (those are the default values.)
 > This is rarely sufficient to fix the convergence issue and you may want
 > to check the presence of low-frequency large amplitude modes (large
 > shift of low-energy modes) and potentially exclude them as they are
 > poorly treated with this model.
 > You can do them with:
 > `RedDim=Block`
 > followed by the list of modes to exclude (the reference state is the
 > lower state, so you will have to list the modes to exclude from the
 > initial state, compatible with the definition of the shift vector K).
 > Note that Gaussian will try to build a consistent set of modes (same
 > number in each state) to exclude from the vibronic treatment. It has a
 > safety check to stop if too many modes are selected this way compared to
 > the initial list. You can force it by changing the value of
 > `RedDim=BlockTol`
 > The definition of the set of modes to exclude is based on the Duschinsky
 > matrix, which can be printed with,
 > `Print=Matrix=J` (we generally always print both J and K with
 > `Print=Matrix=JK`)
 > Be careful in the truncation as the model system obtained this way may
 > not be representative of the full system anymore.
 >
 > To obtain a fully converged spectrum, you can use the time-dependent
 > formalism instead of the sum-over-states one (the default in this case)
 > with the option
 > `TimeDependent`
 > I would recommend to use first TI to setup your protocol (trying the
 > options described above) and once a sufficient convergence is reached,
 > use TD to obtain the full band-shape. Indeed, the breakdown of the
 > Franck-Condon approximation has a direct impact on a TI calculations
 > (low and slow convergence) but is difficult to detect within the TD
 > framework (the spectrum is always fully converged by definition).
 >
 > Regarding ForcePrtSpectrum, the option (and all "advanced"
 options) is
 > still there but I chose not to document it as it is a double-edged sword
 > and could be misinterpreted. There are technically 2 separate checks but
 > the one you mention will not be helpful in your case (at least in a
 > first time).
 > - the first test is on the overall convergence after 2-modes
 > combinations. If it is below 20% (which is the case here), Gaussian will
 > stop. You can override this with
 > `Advanced=ForceFCCalc`
 > - the second test is at the end of the calculations, before printing the
 > spectrum. If the progression is below 50%, the spectrum is not printed.
 > You can override this with
 > `Advanced=ForcePrtSpectrum`
 >
 > Regarding the description of the potential energy surfaces, Gaussian
 > supports AdiabaticHessian (AH, the default), AdiabaticShift (AS),
 > VerticalHessian (VH, also noted VFC) and VerticalGradient (VG, aka LCM
 > or IMDHO). From my understanding, a behavior similar to IMDHO-FA would
 > be obtained in Gaussian with
 > `VerticalHessian DataMod=Duschinsky=Identity`
 > Simplified models (like VG) should be used with care. While it is easier
 > to reach convergence with them, they can also misrepresent the actual
 > system, leading to incorrect spectra. The validity of such approximation
 > will depend on your system.
 >
 > I hope this will answer your questions regarding the progression and
 > keywords.
 >
 > Best regards,
 >
 > Julien Bloino
 >
 > ------ Original Message ------
 > > From: "Tobias Kraemer Tobias.Kraemer!A!mu.ie"
 <owner-chemistry],[ccl.net>
 > To: "Bloino, Julien " <julien.bloino],[gmail.com>
 > Sent: 2018-10-30 03:36:55
 > Subject: CCL:G: Low-progression Franck-Condon transitions
 >
 > >Dear Jan,
 > >
 > >
 > >thanks for your reply. Sorry for being so unspecific in my post, I
 > >thought this was a more generic error that could be solved more easily.
 > >You are right about the fact that the geometries of the ground and
 > >excited state of this ZnPc complex differ (not too a large extend, but
 > >obviously enough). The ground state is planar with D4h symmetry, while
 > >the structure of the (1st) excited state converges to a C2v-symmetric
 > >geometry (consistent with literature J. Chem. Phys., 2015, 142,
 > >094310). In fact the white paper by Barone "Vibrationally-excited
 > >states in Gaussian09" mentions the distortion of the excited state
 > >geometry away from a planar geometry in the ground state can cause
 > >problems (and FC does not apply). However, since the aforementioned
 > >paper in J. Chem. Phys. presents a FC spectrum, I believe that it must
 > >still be possible to generate the spectrum, and find a way around this
 > >issue. I should also mention that by visual inspection the excited
 > >state geometry is not hugely different from the ground state (but
 > >obviously large enough to cause a problem). It seems in G09 one could
 > >force the plot of a spectrum nonetheless, via FORCEPRTSPECTRUM. My
 > >question was also regarding a range of other keywords that might be
 > >useful here (MAXBANDS/MAXC1/MAXOVR..). So the question still stands,
 > >since I think it must be possible to solve this issue.
 > >
 > >
 > >Nonetheless, I might try one of your suggestions as well, thanks for
 > >pointing me in this direction.
 > >
 > >
 > >Best,
 > >
 > >
 > >Tobias
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >Dr Tobias Krämer
 > >
 > >Lecturer in Inorganic Chemistry
 > >
 > >Department of Chemistry
 > >
 > >Maynooth University
 > >
 > >[Maynooth University PNG Trans]
 > >
 > >Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
 > >
 > >E: tobias.kraemer|-|mu.ie T: +353 (0)1 474 7517
 > >
 > >________________________________
 > >>From: owner-chemistry+tobias.kraemer==mu.ie|-|ccl.net
 > >><owner-chemistry+tobias.kraemer==mu.ie|-|ccl.net> on behalf
 of Jan
 > >>Götze jgoetze[]zedat.fu-berlin.de
 <owner-chemistry|-|ccl.net>
 > >Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 4:25:23 PM
 > >To: Tobias Kraemer
 > >Subject: CCL:G: Low-progression Franck-Condon transitions
 > >
 > >
 > >Sent to CCL by: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_G=c3=b6tze?=
 > >[jgoetze##zedat.fu-berlin.de]
 > >Dear Tobias,
 > >
 > >the data you provided only allow for limited analysis why your proble
 > >occurs. In case you did not do any errors in preparation of your two
 > >excited states, it appears that the minima of ground and excited state
 > >are very distant from each other (such as groups rotating, and/or
 > >normal
 > >modes differing strongly between ground and excited state). For a
 > >large,
 > >planar, aromatic system like pc this is rather unusual. As such,
 > >without
 > >further details on the molecular structure, any additional help can
 > >only
 > >be guesswork.
 > >
 > >To obtain a preliminary spectrum quickly and often without problems, I
 > >personally would suggest using a vertical TD approach, which might be
 > >available in Gaussian16, or an IMDHO-FA as in ORCA. See for example
 > >doi:10.1021/ct500830a
 > >
 > >Cheers,
 > >Jan
 > >
 > >Am 26.10.2018 um 12:57 schrieb Tobias Kraemer tobias.kraemer[a]mu.ie:
 > >>Sent to CCL by: "Tobias  Kraemer"
 [tobias.kraemer_._mu.ie]
 > >>Hello everyone,
 > >>
 > >>I am interested in calculating vibrationally-resolved spectra in
 G16.
 > >>The
 > >>molecule in question is a phthalocyanine (pc) complex. I've
 followed
 > >>the
 > >>protocol detailed in the whitepaper by Barone et al., however in
 the
 > >>final step (generating the spectrum) an error occurs:
 > >>
 > >>
 > >>       ==================================================
 > >>                Calculations of Band Intensities
 > >>       ==================================================
 > >>
 > >>   -- To: vibronic fundamental state --
 > >>      Spectrum progression:    0.06%
 > >>
 > >>   -- To: single overtones --
 > >>      Spectrum progression:    0.71%
 > >>
 > >>   -- To: combinations of  2 simultaneously excited modes --
 > >>      Spectrum progression:    4.14%
 > >>
 > >>   ERROR: Low progression after class 2. Total convergence =  4.1%.
 > >>          The vibronic spectrum will likely be unreliable.
 Stopping.
 > >>
 > >>The whitepaper provides some possible causes, but I'd like to ask
 for
 > >>some expert opinions here on CCL nonetheless. In the excited state
 > >>optimisation I have included 6 states, of which the gradients for
 the
 > >>first one are to be followed [TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1)].
 > >>There are a good number of keywords listed on the Gaussian16
 webpage
 > >>that
 > >>relate to this type of calculation, and I'd appreciate some
 guidance
 > >>on
 > >>the above issue and possible ways around it.
 > >>
 > >>Thanks for your help, as always much appreciated.
 > >>
 > >>Kind regards,
 > >>
 > >>Tobias
 > >
 > >
 > >-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script
 > >=-http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp-:-//www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp-:-//www.ccl.net/spammers.txt--_000_DB7PR02MB40905EFC8A6B3A0AA05CCEBE8BCC0DB7PR02MB4090eurp_
 > >Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
 > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 > >
 > ><html>
 > ><head>
 > ><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
 > >charset=iso-8859-1">
 > ><style type="text/css"
 style="display:none;"><!-- P
 > >{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
 > ></head>
 > ><body dir="ltr">
 > ><div id="divtagdefaultwrapper"
 >
 >style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;"
 > >dir="ltr">
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Dear
 Jan,</p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
 > ></p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">thanks for your
 reply. Sorry
 > >for being so unspecific in my post, I thought this was a more generic
 > >error that could be solved more easily. You are right about the fact
 > >that the geometries of the ground and excited&nbsp;state
 > >of this ZnPc complex&nbsp;differ (not too a large extend, but
 obviously
 > >enough). The ground state is planar with D4h symmetry, while the
 > >structure of the&nbsp;(1st)&nbsp;excited state converges to a
 > >C2v-symmetric geometry (consistent with literature J. Chem. Phys.,
 > >2015,
 > >142, 094310). In fact the white paper by Barone
 > >&quot;Vibrationally-excited states in Gaussian09&quot; mentions
 the
 > >distortion of the excited state geometry away from a planar geometry in
 > >the ground state can cause problems (and FC does not apply). However,
 > >since the
 > >aforementioned paper in J. Chem. Phys. presents a FC spectrum, I
 > >believe that it must still be possible to generate the spectrum, and
 > >find a way around this issue. I should also mention that by visual
 > >inspection&nbsp;the excited state geometry is not hugely different
 > >from the ground state (but obviously large enough to cause a problem).
 > >It seems in G09 one could force the plot of a spectrum nonetheless, via
 > >FORCEPRTSPECTRUM. My question was also regarding a range of other
 > >keywords that might be useful here (MAXBANDS/MAXC1/MAXOVR..).
 > >So the question still stands, since I think it must be possible to
 > >solve this issue.</p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
 > ></p>
 > ><p
 style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Nonetheless,&nbsp;I might
 try
 > >one of your suggestions as well, thanks for pointing me in this
 > >direction.</p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
 > ></p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Best,</p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
 > ></p>
 > ><p
 style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Tobias</p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">&nbsp;
 &nbsp;</p>
 > ><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
 > ></p>
 > ><div id="Signature">
 > ><div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr"
 style="font-size: 12pt; color:
 > >rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif, Helvetica,
 > >EmojiFont, &quot;Apple Color Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI
 Emoji&quot;,
 > >NotoColorEmoji, &quot;Segoe UI Symbol&quot;, &quot;Android
 Emoji&quot;,
 > >EmojiSymbols;">
 > ><p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
 0.0001pt; font-size:12pt;
 > >font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif;
 color:rgb(33,33,33)">
 > ><span style="font-size:9pt;
 > >font-family:Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont;
 > >color:rgb(35,31,32)"><b>Dr Tobias
 Krämer</b></span></p>
 > ><p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
 0.0001pt; font-size:12pt;
 > >font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif;
 color:rgb(33,33,33)">
 > ><span style="color:rgb(35,31,32);
 > >font-family:Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont;
 font-size:9pt">Lecturer
 > >in Inorganic Chemistry</span><br>
 > ></p>
 > ><p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
 0.0001pt; font-size:12pt;
 > >font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif;
 color:rgb(33,33,33)">
 > ><span style="color:rgb(35,31,32);
 > >font-family:Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont;
 font-size:9pt">Department
 > >of Chemistry</span></p>
 > ><p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
 0.0001pt; font-size:12pt;
 > >font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif;
 color:rgb(33,33,33)">
 > ><span style="font-size:9pt;
 > >font-family:Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont;
 > >color:rgb(35,31,32)">Maynooth
 University&nbsp;</span></p>
 > ><p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
 0.0001pt; font-size:12pt;
 > >font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif;
 color:rgb(33,33,33)">
 > ><b style="font-size:12pt"><span
 > >style="font-family:Arial-BoldMT,serif,EmojiFont;
 > >color:rgb(35,31,32)"><img class="EmojiInsert"
 width="145" height="89"
 > >id="x_Picture_x0020_1" alt="Maynooth University PNG
 Trans"
 > >style="width:1.5104in; height:0.927in"
 data-outlook-trace="F:0|T:1"
 >
 >src="cid:image004.png|-|01D35E2B.48797380"></span></b><br>
 > ></p>
 > ><p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
 0.0001pt; font-size:12pt;
 > >font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif;
 color:rgb(33,33,33)">
 > ><span style="font-size:9pt;
 > >font-family:Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont;
 > >color:rgb(35,31,32)">Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co.
 Kildare,
 > >Ireland.</span></p>
 > ><p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
 0.0001pt; font-size:12pt;
 > >font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif;
 color:rgb(33,33,33)">
 > ><b style="font-size:12pt"><span
 style="font-size:9pt;
 > >font-family:Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont;
 >
 >color:rgb(35,31,32)">E:&nbsp;</span></b><span
 style="font-size:9pt;
 > >font-family:Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont;
 >
 >color:rgb(35,31,32)">tobias.kraemer|-|mu.ie&nbsp;<b>T</b><b>:</b>&nbsp;&#43;353
 > >(0)1 474 7517</span></p>
 > ><p
 style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif,&quot;Apple
 > >Color Emoji&quot;,&quot;Segoe UI
 Emoji&quot;,NotoColorEmoji,&quot;Segoe
 > >UI Symbol&quot;,&quot;Android
 Emoji&quot;,EmojiSymbols">
 > ><i><span style="font-size:10pt;
 >
 >font-family:Cambria,serif,serif,EmojiFont"></span></i></p>
 > ></div>
 > ></div>
 > ></div>
 > ><hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%"
 tabindex="-1">
 > ><div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font
 face="Calibri, sans-serif"
 > >style="font-size:11pt"
 color="#000000"><b>From:</b>
 > >owner-chemistry&#43;tobias.kraemer==mu.ie|-|ccl.net
 > >&lt;owner-chemistry&#43;tobias.kraemer==mu.ie|-|ccl.net&gt;
 on behalf
 > >of Jan Götze jgoetze[]zedat.fu-berlin.de
 > >&lt;owner-chemistry|-|ccl.net&gt;<br>
 > ><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 27, 2018 4:25:23
 PM<br>
 > ><b>To:</b> Tobias Kraemer<br>
 > ><b>Subject:</b> CCL:G: Low-progression Franck-Condon
 transitions</font>
 > ><div>&nbsp;</div>
 > ></div>
 > ><div class="BodyFragment"><font
 size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
 > ><div class="PlainText"><br>
 > >Sent to CCL by: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_G=c3=b6tze?=
 > >[jgoetze##zedat.fu-berlin.de]<br>
 > >Dear Tobias,<br>
 > ><br>
 > >the data you provided only allow for limited analysis why your proble
 > ><br>
 > >occurs. In case you did not do any errors in preparation of your two
 > ><br>
 > >excited states, it appears that the minima of ground and excited state
 > ><br>
 > >are very distant from each other (such as groups rotating, and/or
 > >normal <br>
 > >modes differing strongly between ground and excited state). For a
 > >large, <br>
 > >planar, aromatic system like pc this is rather unusual. As such,
 > >without <br>
 > >further details on the molecular structure, any additional help can
 > >only <br>
 > >be guesswork.<br>
 > ><br>
 > >To obtain a preliminary spectrum quickly and often without problems, I
 > ><br>
 > >personally would suggest using a vertical TD approach, which might be
 > ><br>
 > >available in Gaussian16, or an IMDHO-FA as in ORCA. See for example
 > ><br>
 > >doi:10.1021/ct500830a<br>
 > ><br>
 > >Cheers,<br>
 > >Jan<br>
 > ><br>
 > >Am 26.10.2018 um 12:57 schrieb Tobias Kraemer
 > >tobias.kraemer[a]mu.ie:<br>
 > >&gt; Sent to CCL by: &quot;Tobias&nbsp; Kraemer&quot;
 > >[tobias.kraemer_._mu.ie]<br>
 > >&gt; Hello everyone,<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt; I am interested in calculating vibrationally-resolved spectra
 in
 > >G16. The<br>
 > >&gt; molecule in question is a phthalocyanine (pc) complex. I've
 > >followed the<br>
 > >&gt; protocol detailed in the whitepaper by Barone et al., however
 in
 > >the<br>
 > >&gt; final step (generating the spectrum) an error
 occurs:<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 > >==================================================<br>
 >
 >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 > >Calculations of Band Intensities<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 > >==================================================<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- To: vibronic fundamental state
 --<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Spectrum
 > >progression:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.06%<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- To: single overtones --<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Spectrum
 > >progression:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.71%<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- To: combinations of&nbsp; 2
 simultaneously excited
 > >modes --<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Spectrum
 > >progression:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 4.14%<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; ERROR: Low progression after class 2.
 Total
 > >convergence =&nbsp; 4.1%.<br>
 >
 >&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 The vibronic
 > >spectrum will likely be unreliable. Stopping.<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt; The whitepaper provides some possible causes, but I'd like to
 ask
 > >for<br>
 > >&gt; some expert opinions here on CCL nonetheless. In the excited
 > >state<br>
 > >&gt; optimisation I have included 6 states, of which the gradients
 for
 > >the<br>
 > >&gt; first one are to be followed
 [TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1)].<br>
 > >&gt; There are a good number of keywords listed on the Gaussian16
 > >webpage that<br>
 > >&gt; relate to this type of calculation, and I'd appreciate some
 > >guidance on<br>
 > >&gt; the above issue and possible ways around it.<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt; Thanks for your help, as always much appreciated.<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt; Kind regards,<br>
 > >&gt;<br>
 > >&gt; Tobias<br>
 > ><br>
 > ><br>
 > >-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script
 > >=-<br<br=<br<br>
 > ><br<br>
 > >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a
 > >href="http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message">http-:-//www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message</a><br>;
 > ><br<br>
 > >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a
 > >href="http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message">http-:-//www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message</a><br>;
 > ><br<br>
 > >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a
 > >href="http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml">http-:-//www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml</a><br>;
 > ><br>
 > >Before posting, check wait time at: <a
 > >href="http://www.ccl.net">http-:-//www.ccl.net</a><br>;
 > ><br>
 > >Job: <a href="http://www.ccl.net/jobs";>http://www.ccl.net/jobs</a> <br>
 > >Conferences: <a
 > >href="http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/">;
 > >http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/</a><br>;
 > ><br>
 > >Search Messages: <a
 > >href="http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml">http-:-//www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml</a><br>;
 > ><br<br>
 > >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a
 > >href="http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt">=</a><br>;
 > ><br>
 > >RTFI: <a
 > >href="http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/">http-:-//www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/</a><br>;
 > ><br>
 > ><br>
 > ></div>
 > ></span></font></div>
 > ></body>
 > ></html>