Hi,Imaginary modes under '-10 cm-1' if not many can be safely ignored. You could try to get ridof the imaginary mode by distorting the structure along the bond, angle or dihedral which iscausing the imaginary mode.I should add that imaginary modes are tricky to get rid of when the solvent correction is used.The optimization could be done using solvent correction and frequency can be computed in gas phase.'TightSCF TightOpt Grid7 Gridx9' seems to work for all of our systems upto 200 atoms, producingaccurate results in good agreement with experimental observations.Hope this helpswith best- SachinOn Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 7:32 PM Grigoriy Zhurko reg_zhurko.:.chemcraftprog.com <owner-chemistry**ccl.net> wrote:
Sent to CCL by: "Grigoriy Zhurko" [reg_zhurko()chemcraftprog.com]
Hello,
I compute some molecules with Orca 5.0.3, and the computation sometimes
produces small negative frequencies, despite the symmetry of the molecules is
C1. If I repeat the computation with another starting point, with some
probability all frequencies are positive.
I found that this problem arises when two additions to the model are added:
the solvent model (!CPCM(Water)) and additions of some explicit water
molecules to the whole model. I understand that these water molecules produce
very small frequencies along the h-bonds, and these frequencies can become
negative because of some problems with numerical integration. I tried the
combination of options !DefGrid3, !TightOpt, !VeryTightSCF, and still
sometimes the negative frequencies are produced. Maybe I need to further
increase the computational accuracy with options like "!VeryTightOpt",
"!DefGrid9", UltraTightSCF? I suppose you understand what I mean; currently
I didn't find the information in the manual, how to further decrease the
optimization convergence threshold or increase the accuracy of DFT grid.
Please suggest how to do that.
In my work I can avoid using the frequencies since I need mainly the
energies; however I need to explain this somehow in the paper. I suppose, it
is not good to compute the entropy of molecules with my keywords, because
small frequencies produce big errors with vibrational entropy. So, please
suggest me, what should I write in my papers, to explain that it is not good
to compute the Gibbs energy of my molecules, but it is correct to compute and
use the common energy.
Grigoriy Zhurko
https://chemcraftprog.com
-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY**ccl.net or use:
http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST**ccl.net or use
http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml
Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net
Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/
Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt
RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/