I was getting
Negative frequencies whenever I used more than one node in the
calculations. One of the ORCA users told me that the issue with the appearance of the Negative
frequencies came from using more than one node. Of course, those
frequencies disappeared right after I used one node... hope that's your
problem.
If that is true, it must have been a temporary bug that has
long been fixed. It is definitely not accurate information on the
parallelization of ORCA.
Everybody is encouraged to update
to ORCA 5.0.3. which is the by far most powerful of the program yet.
Le dimanche 10 juillet 2022 à 09:44:36 UTC+1, Neese,
Frank neese]![ kofo.mpg.de <owner-chemistry|*| ccl.net> a écrit :
Just to briefly clarify
TightSCF TightOpt Grid7 Gridx9'
Is ORCA pre 5.0. with 5.0 these old grids are gone and the new grids are much
more accurate and don‘t need bumping up.
The OP has tried these things and the negative frequencies
remained, meaning that they are not numerical noise. The OP was advised to
displace the molecule along the respective real modes. It was also pointed out
to him that there is a compound script
that comes with ORCA 5.0 and later that automatically displaces the molecule
along any negative frequency mode until all negative frequencies are
gone.
That is the best advise I am able to give.
Sent from my iPad
On 10. Jul 2022, at 07:56, Sachin Ramesh
sachinadityaramesh() gmail.com <owner-chemistry|*|ccl.net> wrote:
Hi,
Imaginary modes under '-10 cm-1' if not many can be
safely ignored. You could try to get rid
of the imaginary mode by distorting the structure along the bond,
angle or dihedral which is
causing the imaginary mode.
I should add that imaginary modes are tricky to get
rid of when the solvent correction is used.
The optimization could be done using solvent correction and
frequency can be computed in gas phase.
'TightSCF TightOpt Grid7 Gridx9' seems to work for all of
our systems upto 200 atoms, producing
accurate results in good agreement with experimental observations.
Hope this helps
with best
- Sachin
Sent to CCL by: "Grigoriy Zhurko" [reg_zhurko()chemcraftprog.com]
Hello,
I compute some molecules with Orca 5.0.3, and the computation sometimes
produces small negative frequencies, despite the symmetry of the molecules is
C1. If I repeat the computation with another starting point, with some
probability all frequencies are positive.
I found that this problem arises when two additions to the model are added:
the solvent model (!CPCM(Water)) and additions of some explicit water
molecules to the whole model. I understand that these water molecules produce
very small frequencies along the h-bonds, and these frequencies can become
negative because of some problems with numerical integration. I tried the
combination of options !DefGrid3, !TightOpt, !VeryTightSCF, and still
sometimes the negative frequencies are produced. Maybe I need to further
increase the computational accuracy with options like "!VeryTightOpt",
"!DefGrid9", UltraTightSCF? I suppose you understand what I mean; currently
I didn't find the information in the manual, how to further decrease the
optimization convergence threshold or increase the accuracy of DFT grid.
Please suggest how to do that.
In my work I can avoid using the frequencies since I need mainly the
energies; however I need to explain this somehow in the paper. I suppose, it
is not good to compute the entropy of molecules with my keywords, because
small frequencies produce big errors with vibrational entropy. So, please
suggest me, what should I write in my papers, to explain that it is not good
to compute the Gibbs energy of my molecules, but it is correct to compute and
use the common energy.
Grigoriy Zhurko
https://chemcraftprog.com
-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY**ccl.net or use:
<="" a="">
E-mail to administrators:
CHEMISTRY-REQUEST**ccl.net or use
<="" a="">
<="" a="">
Before posting, check wait time at:
http://www.ccl.net
Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
Conferences:
http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/
Search Messages:
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
<="" a="">
RTFI:
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Frank Neese
Department of Molecular Theory and Spectroscopy
Max-Planck Institut für
Kohlenforschung
Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1
D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr
Germany
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|