CCL: chemical literature searching for poor, unaffiliated
- From: Laurence Cuffe <cuffe:_:mac.com>
- Subject: CCL: chemical literature searching for poor,
unaffiliated
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 07:44:18 +0100
I’d second Michel’s suggestion of using just plain Google,
but add that adding the restriction filetype:pdf can provide a site effective
primary filter.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=metol+ <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=metol+> Pudbmed can
sometimes turn up interesting results without a specifically medical focus as
well. The link I’ve placed here is for a search for Metol.
A each for “Density functional calculations” returns 80,000
results.
My other go-to data base site is
https://eric.ed.gov/ <https://eric.ed.gov/>
however that is primarily education related sources, so things like the journal
of Chemical education might show up, but little else. As my primary research
interest now is education, I use it a lot.
Best
Lawrence Cuffe
> On 29 Apr 2024, at 15:22, Michel Petitjean petitjean.chiral]=[gmail.com
<http://gmail.com/>
<owner-chemistry,,ccl.net <mailto:owner-chemistry,,ccl.net>> wrote:
>
>
> Sent to CCL by: Michel Petitjean [petitjean.chiral-x-gmail.com <http://petitjean.chiral-x-gmail.com/>]
> Dear David,
> You may have a look at semantic scholar
> https://www.semanticscholar.org <https://www.semanticscholar.org/>
> But please do not ignore just Google (not the scholar one), which
> points to a number of free resources ignored by Scholar Google, which
> in turn may point to pertinent resouces.
> Best regards,
> Michel.
> Michel Petitjean, retired scsientist
> http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html
>
> Le lun. 29 avr. 2024 à 04:14, David Shobe shobedavid]=[gmail.com
> <owner-chemistry ~ ccl.net> a écrit :
>>
>> Apparently I was wrong: Google Scholar does have Boolean searching, but
Google doesn't want you to know about it! In fact, searching with Chrome led to
a crash. (Coincidence? Who knows?) But I found information on a different
browser.
>>
>> For the record, use & for and and | for or.
>>
>> I'd still like to know about alternatives though.
>>
>> --David Shobe
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024, 5:05 PM David Shobe shobedavid/agmail.com
<owner-chemistry,,ccl.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> As I mentioned on a different thread, I have, as far as I know,
only Google Scholar for literature searching. I do not have an affiliation with
an organization (such as a university) that would have an institutional
subscription to something like STN or Reaxys. I don't have a lot of money
either. Do I have any other options besides Google Scholar?
>>>
>>> --David Shobe
>>>
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
> To recover the email address of the author of the message, please
change> > >
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > >
> Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
> Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/
> > > >
>