On 29 Apr 2024, at 15:22, Michel Petitjean
petitjean.chiral]=[gmail.com <http://gmail.com/>
<owner-chemistry^^^ccl.net> wrote:
Sent to CCL by: Michel Petitjean [petitjean.chiral-x-gmail.com
<http://petitjean.chiral-x-gmail.com/>]
Dear David,
You may have a look at semantic scholar
https://www.semanticscholar.org
But please do not ignore just Google (not the scholar one), which
points to a number of free resources ignored by Scholar Google, which
in turn may point to pertinent resouces.
Best regards,
Michel.
Michel Petitjean, retired scsientist
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html
Le lun. 29 avr. 2024 à 04:14, David Shobe shobedavid]=[gmail.com
<owner-chemistry ~ ccl.net> a écrit :
Apparently I was wrong: Google Scholar does have Boolean searching,
but Google doesn't want you to know about it! In fact, searching
with Chrome led to a crash. (Coincidence? Who knows?) But I found
information on a different browser.
For the record, use & for and and | for or.
I'd still like to know about alternatives though.
--David Shobe
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024, 5:05 PM David Shobe shobedavid/agmail.com
<owner-chemistry,,ccl.net> wrote:
As I mentioned on a different thread, I have, as far as I know,
only Google Scholar for literature searching. I do not have an
affiliation with an organization (such as a university) that would
have an institutional subscription to something like STN or Reaxys.
I don't have a lot of money either. Do I have any
other options
besides Google Scholar?
--David Shobe>> the strange characters on the top line to the ^^^ sign.
You can also>>
E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST^^^ccl.net or use>>