From:	VSCHELDE%STEEVAST.RUG.AC.BE -8 at 8- OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 11:56 N
Subject:	solvation energy

From:	"DR. DOUGLAS A. SMITH, UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO" <DSMITH &$at$& uoft02.utoledo.edu>
Date:	03 Nov 1992 08:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	"DR. DOUGLAS A. SMITH, UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO" <DSMITH : at : uoft02.utoledo.edu>
Date:	03 Nov 1992 08:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:	Re: ECPs, transition metals, and parallel computing

From:	CUNDARIT%MEMSTVX1.BITNET $#at#$ OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 08:19 CDT
Subject:	TMs, parallel computing and ECPs

From:	djh (- at -) ccl.net (David Heisterberg)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 09:17:59 -0500
Subject:	MPP vs. workstations?

From:	rs0thp()at()RohmHaas.Com (Dr. Tom Pierce)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 10:05:28 +22305823 (EST)
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	Pedro A.M. Vazquez <vazquez { *at * } iqm.unicamp.br>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 15:08:06 GMT-3:00
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	theresa-0at0-si.fi.ameslab.gov (Theresa Windus)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 12:18:59 CST
Subject:	parallel MOPAC

From:	jas -x- at -x- medinah.atc.ucarb.com
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 13:16:40 -0500
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	kpc20 : at : cas.org (Kevin P. Cross Ext. 3192 Room 2209B)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 14:33:23 EST
Subject:	Re(2): ECPs, transition metals, and parallel computing

From:	berkley -8 at 8- wubs.wustl.edu (Berkley Shands)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 15:07:08 -0600
Subject:	MPP vs workstations

From:	jas #*at*# medinah.atc.ucarb.com
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 17:00:55 -0500
Subject:	Re: ...parallel computing

From:	Andy Holder <AHOLDER { *at * } VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
Date:	03 Nov 1992 16:47:01 -0600 (CST)
Subject:	Conformational energies by Semiempirical methods.

From:	JWTESCH "at@at" DFWVM04.VNET.IBM.COM
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 17:32:15 CST
Subject:	Parallel Clusters

From:	mckelvey %! at !% Kodak.COM
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 22:21:48 -0500
Subject:	IBM/RS6000 compilers