From:	xiang (+ at +) auriga.rose.brandeis.edu (Xiaoou Xiang)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 00:09:10 -0500
Subject:	periodic BC in AMBER4.0

From:	Galen Gawboy <gawboy' at 'sodium.mps.ohio-state.edu>
Date:	Wed, 9 Feb 1994 23:53:18 -0500 (EST)
Subject:	CCL:OOP in comp. chem

From:	seibel "at@at" phmms0.mms.smithkline.com (George Seibel)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 00:21:53 -0500
Subject:	Re: OOP

From:	"Gerald Loeffler" <gl' at 'coil.mdy.univie.ac.at>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 08:40:44 +0100
Subject:	OOP in Comp. Chemistry

From:	Leif.Laaksonen -x- at -x- csc.fi
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 10:56:43 +0200
Subject:	Re: CCL:OOP in Comp. Chemistry

From:	"Anatoly Krasavin" <kras()at()ncc.free.net>
Date:	Sun, 9 Jan 94 12:40:08 +0300
Subject:	Re: OOP All languages are practically equal!

From:	Kenneth Geisshirt <kneth { *at * } kiku.dk>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 10:57:29 MET
Subject:	Chemical Compilers

From:	Kenneth Geisshirt <kneth ( ( at ) ) kiku.dk>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 11:57:06 MET
Subject:	Chemical Compiler

From:	h.rzepa[ AT ]ic.ac.uk (Henry Rzepa) (Henry Rzepa)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 10:53:45 GMT
Subject:	Re: CCL:Re: CCL:OOP in Comp. Chemistry

From:	"Moshe Olshansky" <moshe_o # - at - # vnet.IBM.COM>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 16:34:26 IDT
Subject:	FORTRAN versus C

From:	<FS300627 ^at^ Sol.YorkU.CA>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 10:06 EDT
Subject:	MDL problems?

From:	figuei-0at0-lutece.rutgers.edu (Francisco Figueirido)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 11:05:52 -0500
Subject:	Re: CCL:Re: CCL:CCL:OOP

From:	ryszard (+ at +) MSI.COM (Ryszard Czerminski X 285)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 11:22:58 -0500
Subject:	FORTRAN versus C

From:	srp()at()ZGI.COM (Scott Presnell)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 08:56:58 -0800
Subject:	Re: CCL:FORTRAN versus C

From:	mam -AatT- xenon.chem.ucla.edu (McAllister Michael)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 09:30:55 PST
Subject:	thermochem in gaussian

From:	shepard.,at,.dirac.tcg.anl.gov (Ron Shepard)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 12:28:18 CST
Subject:	Re: CCL:FORTRAN versus C

From:	rs0thp \\at// RohmHaas.Com (Dr. Tom Pierce)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 13:37:33 +22305350 (EST)
Subject:	Re: CCL:FORTRAN versus C

From:	"G. Ravishanker" <ravishan \\at// swan.wcc.wesleyan.edu>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 13:55:51 -0500
Subject:	Re: CCL:Re: CCL:FORTRAN versus C

From:	cmao771 $#at#$ charon.chpc.utexas.edu (Bersuker)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 12:27:16 CST
Subject:	MM with transition metal cpds

From:	burkhart #*at*# goodyear.com (Craig W. Burkhart)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 14:57:45 -0500
Subject:	Re: CCL:thermochem in gaussian

From:	<sheridan \\at// merck.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 15:26:18 -0500 (EST)
Subject:	ACS symposium -- similarity

From:	Heather Carlson <heather' at 'rassilon.chem.yale.edu>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 16:25:50 EST
Subject:	religious debate

From:	noy - at - tci002.uibk.ac.at (Teerakiat Kerdcharoen)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 22:28:00 +0100 (NFT)
Subject:	Re: FORTRAN versus C

From:	<sheridan &$at$& merck.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 17:54:39 -0500 (EST)
Subject:	ACS meeting in San Diego

From:	K Bryson <kb7 ( ( at ) ) unix.york.ac.uk>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 1994 22:37:58 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:	psi88 running from g92 checkpoint files.

From:	Dan Severance <dan -8 at 8- omega.chem.yale.edu>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 19:16:44 EST
Subject:	CCL:psi88 running from g92 checkpoint files. (fwd)

From:	wolpert -AatT- neon.chem.utk.edu (Edward Wolpert)
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 21:09:17 EST
Subject:	Re: CCL:religious debate

From:	<cuf %! at !% aol.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 94 22:16:30 EST
Subject:	Computer & health